Cursor vs Kilo Code: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Cursor and Kilo Code side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Cursor leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Cursor
AI code editor with advanced models and flexible pricing
Best for you if:
- • Developers who want an AI IDE with an official picker that already lists Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, and Grok 4.6
Kilo Code
Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.
Best for you if:
- • You want a tool that integrates deeply with popular developer tools (VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, Slack)
| At a Glance | Cursor | Kilo Code |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $8/mo, billed monthly Plus plan | Free plan, paid from $15/user/mo, billed monthly Teams plan |
Category | IDE & Code Editors AI Coding | AI Coding Developer Tools |
Rating | 3.3/5 Trustpilot 1.8 · G2 4.8 634 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Teams requires per-user billing with no monthly minimum | Overage fees beyond included credits |
Choose Cursor or Kilo Code?
Choose Cursor if
- Developers who want an AI IDE with an official picker that already lists Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, and Grok 4.6
- Budget matters ($8/mo, billed monthly vs $15/user/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Kilo Code if
- You want a tool that integrates deeply with popular developer tools (VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, Slack)
- You want a tool that offers a wide selection of AI models (500+) for diverse tasks
In-Depth Analysis
Cursor
AI code editor with advanced models and flexible pricing
Best for solo developers and small teams who want AI-assisted coding without overpaying.
Watch out
Teams requires per-user billing with no monthly minimum
Strengths
- Pro: Powerful AI features
- Pro: VS Code based
- Pro: Fast iterations
Weaknesses
- Con: Subscription needed for full AI
- Con: Resource intensive
Key features
Kilo Code
Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.
Kilo Code's pricing structure is quite generous, especially with the 'Individual' tier being free and offering extensive features like access to 500+ AI models and autocomplete.
Watch out
Overage fees beyond included credits
Strengths
- Pro: Integrates deeply with popular developer tools (VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, Slack).
- Pro: Offers a wide selection of AI models (500+) for diverse tasks.
- Pro: Provides robust features for both individual developers and teams, including AI management and collaboration tools.
- Pro: Open-source nature allows for inspection, customization, and integration.
- Pro: Cloud Agents free up local resources and enable long-running tasks.
Weaknesses
- Con: Advanced team and enterprise features require paid subscriptions.
- Con: Reliance on AI models means performance can vary based on model capabilities.
- Con: Requires integration and setup across multiple platforms for full benefit.
Key features
Plans and prices: Cursor vs Kilo Code
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cursor |
| cursor.com/pricing read Oct 30, 2026 |
| Kilo Code |
| kilocode.ai/pricing read Nov 4, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Cursor pricing and Kilo Code pricing.
Key Takeaways
Cursor
- Lower entry price: $8/mo, billed monthly vs $15/user/mo, billed monthly
Kilo Code
- Choose Kilo Code if you want to build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent
What the data shows
On the data below, Cursor leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Cursor has a published user rating (3.3/5 from 634 reviews); Kilo Code has none we can show.
- Cursor has the lower entry price: $8/mo, billed monthly (Plus) against $15/user/mo, billed monthly (Teams) for Kilo Code.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Cursor and Kilo Code compare in 2026?
On the data below, Cursor leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Cursor has a published user rating (3.3/5 from 634 reviews); Kilo Code has none we can show. Cursor has the lower entry price: $8/mo, billed monthly (Plus) against $15/user/mo, billed monthly (Teams) for Kilo Code. Both have a free plan.
What are Cursor and Kilo Code used for?
Cursor: AI code editor with advanced models and flexible pricing. Kilo Code: Build, ship, and iterate faster with the most popular open source coding agent.
What does Cursor cost vs Kilo Code?
Cursor's cheapest paid plan is Plus at $8/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Kilo Code's cheapest paid plan is Teams at $15/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 4, 2026.
What's the main difference between Cursor and Kilo Code?
Cursor's main strength: powerful AI features. Kilo Code's main strength: integrates deeply with popular developer tools (VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, Slack).
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.