Skip to content
Toolradar
Cursor logo

Cursor

Claim this toolEditor reviewed

AI code editor with cutting-edge models and advanced features

IDE & Code EditorsAI CodingAI Assistants
Visit Website
Reviews onG2Capterra
319 reviews tracked·1 press mention

The Bottom Line

Best for

Developers who want an AI IDE with an official picker that already lists Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, and Grok 4.6.

Entry price

Free plan available, paid tiers above

Biggest pro

Powerful AI features

Biggest con

Subscription needed for full AI

TL;DR - Cursor

  • Current models in the official picker include Claude Fable, Opus, Sonnet, GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Composer 2.5, and Grok 4.5 / 4.6.
  • Hobby is free. Individual starts at a paid tier (Pro). Pro+ is 3x Pro Agent limits. Ultra is 20x. Teams starts at a paid tier per user.
  • Tab, Agent, cloud agents, MCPs, skills, and hooks. Extra model use can bill on-demand after the included pool.
Pricing: Free plan available
Best for: Developers who want an AI IDE with an official picker that already lists Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, and Grok 4.6.
4.7/5 across review platforms

Top Pros

  • Official picker includes Fable 5 and Opus 5, not Opus 4.6
  • GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna are listed
  • Hobby free, Pro $20, Teams $40/user

Top Cons

  • Included model usage can run out; on-demand bills in arrears
  • Pro+ and Ultra dollar prices are on the Individual tab, not a single static number in the HTML we fetched
  • Hobby Agent requests are limited

What Users Say About Cursor

Cursor's official model list (docs.cursor.com, 27 Aug 2026) includes Claude Fable 5, Opus 5, Sonnet 5, GPT-5.6 Sol/Terra/Luna, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Composer 2.5, and Grok 4.5/4.6. Hobby is free. Individual starts at $20/month.

Highlights

  • Official picker includes Fable 5 and Opus 5, not Opus 4.6
  • GPT-5.6 Sol, Terra, and Luna are listed
  • Hobby free, Pro $20, Teams $40/user
  • Pro+ is 3x Pro Agent limits; Ultra is 20x

Limitations

  • Included model usage can run out; on-demand bills in arrears
  • Pro+ and Ultra dollar prices are on the Individual tab, not a single static number in the HTML we fetched
  • Hobby Agent requests are limited

Best for: Developers who want an AI IDE with an official picker that already lists Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, and Grok 4.6.

Editorial synthesis from industry coverage, product docs, and early user reports

Editorial policy

What is Cursor?

Editorial review
Cursor is an AI code editor built on VS Code. Official docs list current models including advanced models like Claude Fable, Claude Opus, Claude Sonnet, GPT-5.6 Sol / Terra / Luna, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Gemini 3.7 Flash, Composer 2.5, Grok 4.5, and Grok 4.6. Official pricing: Hobby is free; Individual starts at a paid tier; Teams starts at a paid tier per user; Enterprise is custom. Paid plans include extended Agent limits, frontier models, cloud agents, MCPs, skills, and hooks. On-demand usage can bill in arrears after the included pool.

Available on: macOS, Web

how we evaluateSourcecursor.com ↗

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Powerful AI features
  • VS Code based
  • Fast iterations

Cons

  • Subscription needed for full AI
  • Resource intensive

Ratings Across the Web

4.7(319 reviews)

Cursor holds an aggregate rating of 4.7 out of 5 from 319 reviews across G2 and Capterra, last checked August 24, 2026.

G2316 reviews
4.6/5
Capterra3 reviews
5/5

Ratings aggregated from independent review platforms. Learn more

Key Features

AI code editorTab completionsAI chatBackground AgentsCode review (Bugbot)Multi-model supportTeam collaborationSAML/OIDC SSOUsage analyticsAudit logs

Pricing Plans

Pricing checked Aug 19, 2026

Hobby

Free

Free. Limited Agent.

  • No credit card
  • Limited Agent requests
  • Access to Composer
Most Popular

Pro

$20/month

$20/month. First paid individual seat.

  • Extended Agent limits
  • Frontier models (Fable 5, Opus 5, GPT-5.6, Gemini, Grok)
  • Cloud agents, MCPs, skills, hooks
  • Grok Bot access

Pro+

null

3x Pro Agent limits. Price on the Individual tab at cursor.com/pricing.

  • 3x Pro limits on Agent
  • Higher Grok Bot usage
  • Same product as Pro

Ultra

null

20x Pro Agent limits. Price on the Individual tab at cursor.com/pricing.

  • 20x Pro limits on Agent
  • Highest Grok Bot usage
  • Priority access to new features

Teams

$40/month

$40/user/month Standard. Premium is the 5x usage tab.

  • Per user / month
  • Central billing, SSO, privacy mode
  • Team marketplace and shared cloud agents
  • Premium tab is 5x Standard Agent limits

Enterprise

null

Contact sales.

  • Pooled usage, invoice / PO
  • SCIM, audit logs, access controls
  • Priority support
Calculate your costView full pricing

Is Cursor worth the price?

72/100

Cursor's Pro tier at $20/user/month is fair for unlimited tab completions and background agents, but the jump to $60 for Pro+ and $200 for Ultra feels steep for only usage multipliers.

The Teams tier at $40/user is reasonable for shared controls, though Enterprise pricing is opaque. Best for solo developers and small teams who want AI-assisted coding without overpaying.

Hidden Costs & Gotchas

Free tier severely limits agent requests and completions

Pro+ and Ultra only multiply usage, not add features

Teams requires per-user billing with no monthly minimum

Enterprise pricing requires sales contact; no self-serve

Bugbot Pro addon costs $40/user extra for unlimited reviews

How Cursor Compares to Competitors

Cursor's pricing is more generous than GitHub Copilot's individual tier but less transparent than Codeium's free-first model. Teams and enterprise features are comparable to Tabnine, though Cursor's usage-based scaling on Pro+/Ultra can be costly for heavy users compared to flat-rate plans from competitors.

How Cursor's pricing compares

At $20/mo, Cursor is the most premium of its 4 direct competitors.

Sourcegraph Cody
$9
Blackbox AI
$9.99
Codegen AI
$9.99
AskCodi
$10
Cursor
$20

Entry paid plan, monthly. Pricing checked Aug 19, 2026.

Reviews

Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT cover
$99Free with your review

Review Cursor, get a free AI guide

Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.

Write a review
4.7/5

Across 319 verified user reviews on G2, Capterra

Add your hands-on experience using the offer above to help the next buyer.

Best Cursor Alternatives

Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.

View full list →
AskCodi logo
AskCodiFreemium

AI coding assistant that explains and generates code

4.6
Kite logo
KiteFree

An AI-powered coding assistant designed to help developers write code faster.

4.2
Blackbox AI logo
Blackbox AIFreemium

AI code assistant with real-time suggestions

4.8
Tabnine logo
TabnineFreemium

AI code completion for any IDE

4.3
Sourcegraph Cody logo
Sourcegraph CodyFreemium

AI coding assistant with codebase context

Codegen AI logo
Codegen AIFreemium

The OS for Code Agents that plan, build, and review with full context and robust integrations.

Gemini Code Assist logo
Gemini Code AssistPaid

AI-powered coding assistance for building, deploying, and operating applications.

See all IDE & code editors tools →

Still deciding?

Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.

All Cursor alternatives7+ tools ranked, pricing + verdict per pickCursor vs AskCodiHead-to-head: features, pricing, who winsCursor vs KiteHead-to-head: features, pricing, who winsCursor vs Blackbox AIHead-to-head: features, pricing, who wins

Explore More

Best IDE & Code Editors ToolsBest AI Coding ToolsBest AI Assistants ToolsBest Free IDE & Code EditorsBest Free AI CodingBest Free AI Assistants

Cursor FAQ

How does Cursor help a developer refactor a large codebase?

Cursor provides AI-powered code editing built on VS Code, enabling developers to refactor large codebases using natural language commands. Its advanced models, including Claude Fable and GPT-5.6 Sol, can understand context across files and suggest or apply changes directly in the editor. This allows for fast iterations on complex refactoring tasks without leaving the IDE.

How does Cursor compare to Sourcegraph Cody?

Cursor is a full AI code editor built on VS Code, while Sourcegraph Cody is an AI coding assistant that integrates into existing editors. Cursor offers a broader set of built-in AI features like cloud agents and MCPs, and supports a wider range of frontier models including Claude Opus and Gemini 3.1 Pro. Cody focuses on codebase-wide context and search, whereas Cursor emphasizes in-editor AI-driven development and fast iterations.

What are the main limitations or trade-offs of using Cursor?

Cursor requires a subscription to access its full AI capabilities, including extended Agent limits and frontier models, which may be a barrier for casual users. Additionally, the editor is resource intensive, meaning it can consume significant system memory and processing power during heavy AI tasks. The free Hobby tier provides basic access but with limited usage.

Which teams benefit most from using Cursor?

Teams that build software rapidly and need AI-assisted code generation, refactoring, and debugging benefit most from Cursor. Engineering teams using VS Code as their primary editor can adopt Cursor with minimal workflow disruption, and its cloud agents and MCPs support collaborative development across larger groups. The Teams plan offers per-user pricing with shared features like skills and hooks.

How is Cursor priced?

Cursor offers a free Hobby tier with basic AI features, and paid Individual and Teams plans that include extended Agent limits, frontier models, cloud agents, MCPs, skills, and hooks. On-demand usage beyond the included pool can be billed in arrears. Enterprise pricing is custom for larger organizations.

Can Cursor integrate with existing VS Code extensions and settings?

Yes, Cursor is built on VS Code, so it supports the same extensions, themes, and settings that developers already use in VS Code. This allows teams to migrate their existing development environment and workflows directly into Cursor without losing productivity. The editor also adds AI-specific features like Composer 2.5 and cloud agents on top of the familiar interface.

Does Cursor include a free tier for trying its AI features?

Yes, Cursor includes a free Hobby tier that provides access to basic AI features and limited usage of its models. This allows developers to evaluate the editor and its capabilities before committing to a paid plan. Paid plans unlock extended Agent limits, frontier models, and advanced features like cloud agents and MCPs.

Why would a developer choose Cursor over a standard VS Code setup?

A developer would choose Cursor over standard VS Code to gain integrated AI capabilities that accelerate coding tasks such as code generation, debugging, and refactoring. Cursor provides access to multiple frontier models like Claude Sonnet and GPT-5.6 Luna directly in the editor, along with features like cloud agents and MCPs that are not available in plain VS Code. This enables faster iterations and reduces context switching.

Source: cursor.com

Guides & Articles

Best MCP Clients in 2026: Which App Should Host Your MCP Servers?

Features Cursor

Best Vibe Coding Tools in 2026

Features Cursor

Best AI Code Assistants in 2026

Features Cursor

Figma MCP Server: How to Turn Designs into Code with AI (2026)

6 min read

Best AI Legacy Code Modernization Tools in 2026

8 min read

The July 2026 AI Coding Price War: Meta Undercut the Frontier by 75%

6 min read