CyberArk vs Opal Security: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for CyberArk and Opal Security side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Opal Security leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
CyberArk
Secure every identity across human, machine, and AI with intelligent privilege controls.
Best for you if:
- • You want comprehensive security for all identity types (human, machine, AI)
Opal Security
The identity governance control plane for AI agents, humans, and service accounts at hypergrowth enterprises.
Best for you if:
- • You want centralized control over diverse identity types (humans, AI agents, service accounts)
| At a Glance | CyberArk | Opal Security |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Not published |
Category | Security Compliance | Identity & Access Security |
Rating | 3.8/5 Trustpilot 3.2 · G2 4.4 · Capterra 4.3 976 reviews | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 30 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | Potential for high minimum user counts | n/a |
Choose CyberArk or Opal Security?
Choose CyberArk if
- You want comprehensive security for all identity types (human, machine, AI)
- You want unified platform simplifies security stack and management
- You work in security, not identity & access
Choose Opal Security if
- You want centralized control over diverse identity types (humans, AI agents, service accounts)
- You want proactive risk identification and mitigation through detailed access analytics
- You work in identity & access, not security
In-Depth Analysis
CyberArk
Secure every identity across human, machine, and AI with intelligent privilege controls.
Watch out
Potential for high minimum user counts
Strengths
- Pro: Comprehensive security for all identity types (human, machine, AI)
- Pro: Unified platform simplifies security stack and management
- Pro: Advanced AI capabilities enhance threat detection and automation
- Pro: Strong focus on privilege controls and least privilege principles
- Pro: Supports hybrid, multi-cloud, and SaaS environments
Weaknesses
- Con: No free tier or trial explicitly mentioned
- Con: Complexity of implementation and management for large enterprises
Key features
Opal Security
The identity governance control plane for AI agents, humans, and service accounts at hypergrowth enterprises.
Strengths
- Pro: Centralized control over diverse identity types (humans, AI agents, service accounts).
- Pro: Proactive risk identification and mitigation through detailed access analytics.
- Pro: Automated and streamlined access request and review processes.
- Pro: Extensive integration capabilities with various enterprise applications and services.
- Pro: Supports least-privilege access principles and compliance requirements.
Weaknesses
- Con: No explicit pricing information available on the website, requiring a demo request.
- Con: Primarily targets hypergrowth enterprises, potentially less suitable for smaller businesses.
- Con: Requires integration with existing systems, which might involve initial setup effort.
Key features
Plans and prices: CyberArk vs Opal Security
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| CyberArk |
| cyberark.com read Oct 3, 2026 |
| Opal Security | No plan prices on file | opal.dev |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on CyberArk pricing and Opal Security pricing.
Key Takeaways
CyberArk
- Choose if you want secure every identity across human, machine, and AI with intelligent privilege controls
Opal Security
- Higher user rating: 4.6/5 vs 3.8/5
What the data shows
On the data below, Opal Security leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Opal Security has the higher user rating (3.8/5 from 976 reviews for CyberArk, 4.6/5 from 30 reviews for Opal Security).
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do CyberArk and Opal Security compare in 2026?
On the data below, Opal Security leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Opal Security has the higher user rating (3.8/5 from 976 reviews for CyberArk, 4.6/5 from 30 reviews for Opal Security).
What are CyberArk and Opal Security used for?
CyberArk: Secure every identity across human, machine, and AI with intelligent privilege controls. Opal Security: The identity governance control plane for AI agents, humans, and service accounts at hypergrowth enterprises.
What does CyberArk cost vs Opal Security?
CyberArk has no public paid-plan price on file. Opal Security has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 3, 2026.
What's the main difference between CyberArk and Opal Security?
CyberArk's main strength: comprehensive security for all identity types (human, machine, AI). Opal Security's main strength: centralized control over diverse identity types (humans, AI agents, service accounts).