Cyclr vs Make: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Cyclr and Make side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Make leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Cyclr
Embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product.
Best for you if:
- • You want accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies
Make
Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Cyclr | Make |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Free plan, paid from $10.59/mo, billed monthly Core plan |
Category | Workflow Automation AI Agents | Workflow Automation Automation |
Rating | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 · Capterra 4.8 94 reviews | 4.0/5 PeerSpot 4.0 18 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Overage fees for API calls beyond included limits | Every module counts as 1 credit -- triggers, filters, routers, and actions all consume credits (only error handlers and Router modules are free) |
Choose Cyclr or Make?
Choose Cyclr if
- You want accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies
- You want enables seamless, in-app integrations for a superior customer experience
Choose Make if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want visual builder
- You want more powerful than Zapier
In-Depth Analysis
Cyclr
Embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product.
Cyclr's pricing is on the expensive side, especially for smaller businesses, with the 'Native Embedded iPaaS - PAYG' starting at $1,595/month for only 100,000 API calls.
Watch out
Overage fees for API calls beyond included limits
Strengths
- Pro: Accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies.
- Pro: Enables seamless, in-app integrations for a superior customer experience.
- Pro: Supports AI integration and agentic workflows, future-proofing products.
- Pro: Offers a vast library of pre-built connectors and tools for custom connector creation.
- Pro: Provides robust security and multi-tenancy for scalable and secure operations.
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing starts at a relatively high monthly cost, potentially limiting smaller businesses.
- Con: Depth of features might have a learning curve for new users, despite low-code tools.
Key features
Make
Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder
Make is the best value in workflow automation for most teams.
Watch out
Every module counts as 1 credit -- triggers, filters, routers, and actions all consume credits (only error handlers and Router modules are free)
Strengths
- Pro: Visual builder
- Pro: More powerful than Zapier
- Pro: Better value
Weaknesses
- Con: Steeper learning curve
- Con: Complex for simple tasks
Key features
Plans and prices: Cyclr vs Make
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclr |
| cyclr.com/pricing read Oct 15, 2026 |
| Make |
| make.com read Sep 27, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Cyclr pricing and Make pricing.
Key Takeaways
Cyclr
- Choose if you want embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product
Make
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Make leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.7/5 from 94 reviews for Cyclr, 4.0/5 from 18 reviews for Make; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- Make starts at $10.59/mo, billed monthly; Cyclr has no public paid plan price on file.
- Only Make has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Cyclr and Make compare in 2026?
On the data below, Make leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.7/5 from 94 reviews for Cyclr, 4.0/5 from 18 reviews for Make; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Make starts at $10.59/mo, billed monthly; Cyclr has no public paid plan price on file. Only Make has a free plan.
What are Cyclr and Make used for?
Cyclr: Embed native integrations and orchestrate AI workflows within your SaaS product. Make: Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder.
What does Cyclr cost vs Make?
Cyclr has no public paid-plan price on file. Make's cheapest paid plan is Core at $10.59/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 15, 2026.
What's the main difference between Cyclr and Make?
Cyclr's main strength: accelerates integration delivery and reduces development overhead for SaaS companies. Make's main strength: visual builder.