Float vs Wrike: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Float and Wrike side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Wrike leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Float
Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team.
Best for you if:
- • You want increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery
Wrike
Enterprise work management platform
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Float | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $700/mo, billed monthly Starter plan | Free plan, paid from $10/user/mo, billed yearly Team plan |
Category | Project Management Resource Planning | Project Management Task Management |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 45 reviews | 4.3/5 G2 4.2 · Capterra 4.4 7,577 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Custom fields locked behind $24.8 tier |
Choose Float or Wrike?
Choose Float if
- You want increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery
- You want provides clear visibility into team availability and project profitability
Choose Wrike if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want powerful project management
- You want good for enterprises
In-Depth Analysis
Float
Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team.
Float's pricing is on the expensive side, especially for smaller teams.
Strengths
- Pro: Increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery
- Pro: Provides clear visibility into team availability and project profitability
- Pro: Helps prevent double-booking and overworking team members
- Pro: Flexible for various work arrangements (full-time, part-time, contractors)
- Pro: User-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality
Weaknesses
- Con: Float's built-in reporting is thin, so teams that need in-depth project budget or financial analysis often end up exporting data to CSV and rebuilding the numbers in a spreadsheet.
- Con: Float is a pure resource scheduler with no real project or task management, lacking task dependencies and hierarchies, so it usually has to be paired with a separate PM tool for the actual execution work.
- Con: Because you pay per scheduled person and capabilities like actuals tracking, advanced reporting, SSO, and multi-currency are gated to the $12-per-person Pro tier, costs scale steeply as headcount grows.
- Con: Larger teams report the schedule becomes cumbersome at scale, citing heavy horizontal scrolling and project managers finding recurring timesheet entry tedious once dozens of people are on it.
Key features
Wrike
Enterprise work management platform
Wrike's pricing starts fairly competitively with the Team plan at $9.8/user/month, offering good value for basic project management.
Watch out
Custom fields locked behind $24.8 tier
Strengths
- Pro: Powerful project management
- Pro: Good for enterprises
- Pro: Custom workflows
- Pro: Resource management
- Pro: Good reporting
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive
- Con: Complex for small teams
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: UI can be overwhelming
- Con: Per-user pricing
Key features
Plans and prices: Float vs Wrike
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Float |
| float.com/pricing read Nov 2, 2026 |
| Wrike |
| wrike.com/pricing read Oct 30, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Float pricing and Wrike pricing.
Key Takeaways
Float
- Choose if you want optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team
Wrike
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Wrike leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.4/5 from 45 reviews for Float, 4.3/5 from 7,577 reviews for Wrike).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Float $700/mo, billed monthly; Wrike $10/user/mo, billed yearly.
- Only Wrike has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Float and Wrike compare in 2026?
On the data below, Wrike leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.4/5 from 45 reviews for Float, 4.3/5 from 7,577 reviews for Wrike). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Float $700/mo, billed monthly; Wrike $10/user/mo, billed yearly. Only Wrike has a free plan.
What are Float and Wrike used for?
Float: Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team. Wrike: Enterprise work management platform.
What does Float cost vs Wrike?
Float's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $700/mo, billed monthly. Wrike's cheapest paid plan is Team at $10/user/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Float and Wrike?
Float's main strength: increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery. Wrike's main strength: powerful project management.