Skip to content

FlowiseAI vs Pace: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

FlowiseAI has shut down. Its own site says: “We're sunsetting Flowise.” Source sunsetting

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for FlowiseAI and Pace side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below, FlowiseAI leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 6 user reviews compared Pricing checked Oct 7, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

FlowiseAI

Visually build, deploy, and scale AI agents and chatbots with an open-source, low-code platform.

Best for you if:

  • • You want a free tier before you commit

Pace

Automate insurance workflows with AI agents

Best for you if:

  • • You want significantly reduces manual operational hours and improves efficiency
At a glance: FlowiseAI vs Pace
At a Glance
FlowiseAI FlowiseAI
Pace Pace
Starts at
Free plan, paid from $35/mo, billed monthly Starter plan
Not published
Category
AI Agents No-Code
Workflow Automation AI Assistants
Rating
4.8/5 G2 4.8 6 reviews n/a
Free plan
Yes No
Watch out for
Self-hosted: you pay for your own compute (AWS/GCP/Azure), a small VPS runs $5-20/month but scales with usage n/a

Choose FlowiseAI or Pace?

FlowiseAI

Choose FlowiseAI if

  • You want a free tier before you commit
  • You want open source LLM builder
  • You want visual interface
  • You work in AI agents, not workflow automation
Pace

Choose Pace if

  • You want significantly reduces manual operational hours and improves efficiency
  • You want achieves high accuracy and speed in processing insurance workflows
  • You work in workflow automation, not AI agents

In-Depth Analysis

FlowiseAI FlowiseAI

Visually build, deploy, and scale AI agents and chatbots with an open-source, low-code platform.

Great value

FlowiseAI is open-source and free to self-host with no limits, the cloud pricing is just for managed hosting.

Watch out

Self-hosted: you pay for your own compute (AWS/GCP/Azure), a small VPS runs $5-20/month but scales with usage

Strengths

  • Pro: Open source LLM builder
  • Pro: Visual interface
  • Pro: LangChain based
  • Pro: Self-hostable
  • Pro: Active community

Weaknesses

  • Con: Learning curve
  • Con: Documentation improving
  • Con: Performance varies
  • Con: Newer platform
  • Con: Limited support

Key features

LLM app builder Drag-and-drop LangChain integration Custom chains API export Self-hosted

Pace Pace

Automate insurance workflows with AI agents

Strengths

  • Pro: Significantly reduces manual operational hours and improves efficiency.
  • Pro: Achieves high accuracy and speed in processing insurance workflows.
  • Pro: Designed specifically for the insurance industry, understanding its unique complexities.
  • Pro: Provides robust governance and audit trails for regulated environments.
  • Pro: Integrates seamlessly with a wide range of existing insurance systems.

Weaknesses

  • Con: Requires integration with existing systems, which may involve initial setup effort.
  • Con: The platform's advanced capabilities may require specialized knowledge to fully leverage.
  • Con: Focuses exclusively on the insurance sector, limiting applicability to other industries.

Key features

Agentic workflow orchestration Enterprise integrations with existing systems (e.g., Guidewire, Duck Creek, Vertafore) Observability and control with QA workflows, reporting, and traceability Document intelligence for data extraction and reasoning Multi-channel communication (phone, email, text) Human-in-the-loop verification for sensitive actions

Plans and prices: FlowiseAI vs Pace

Plans and prices of FlowiseAI and Pace, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
FlowiseAI
  • Free: Free
  • Starter: $35/mo, billed monthly
  • Pro: $65/user/mo, billed monthly
  • Enterprise: Custom pricing
flowiseai.com/pricing read Oct 7, 2026
Pace No plan prices on file withpace.com

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on FlowiseAI pricing and Pace pricing.

Key Takeaways

FlowiseAI

  • Has a free plan

Pace

  • Choose if you want automate insurance workflows with AI agents

What the data shows

On the data below, FlowiseAI leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

  • Only FlowiseAI has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 6 reviews); Pace has none we can show.
  • FlowiseAI starts at $35/mo, billed monthly; Pace has no public paid plan price on file.
  • Only FlowiseAI has a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do FlowiseAI and Pace compare in 2026?

On the data below, FlowiseAI leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only FlowiseAI has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 6 reviews); Pace has none we can show. FlowiseAI starts at $35/mo, billed monthly; Pace has no public paid plan price on file. Only FlowiseAI has a free plan.

What are FlowiseAI and Pace used for?

FlowiseAI: Visually build, deploy, and scale AI agents and chatbots with an open-source, low-code platform. Pace: Automate insurance workflows with AI agents.

What does FlowiseAI cost vs Pace?

FlowiseAI's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $35/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Pace has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 7, 2026.

What's the main difference between FlowiseAI and Pace?

FlowiseAI's main strength: open source LLM builder. Pace's main strength: significantly reduces manual operational hours and improves efficiency.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools