HackerEarth vs HackerRank: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for HackerEarth and HackerRank side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, HackerRank leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
HackerEarth
Assess coding skills at scale for hiring and developer engagement
Best for you if:
- • You want comprehensive assessment covering code quality, logic, and efficiency
HackerRank
Assess and hire top tech talent with coding challenges
Best for you if:
- • You want largest question library reduces assessment creation time
| At a Glance | HackerEarth | HackerRank |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $99/mo, billed monthly Growth plan | From $79/mo, billed monthly Starter plan |
Category | HR & Recruiting Testing & QA | HR & Recruiting Testing & QA |
Rating | 4.6/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.7 634 reviews | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 563 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | Potential overage fees for high assessment volume | Potential seat minimums for Pro/Enterprise |
Choose HackerEarth or HackerRank?
Choose HackerEarth if
- You want comprehensive assessment covering code quality, logic, and efficiency
- You want AI screening saves recruiters significant time weekly
Choose HackerRank if
- You want largest question library reduces assessment creation time
- You want CodePair live interviews replicate real coding collaboration
- Budget matters ($79/mo, billed monthly vs $99/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
HackerEarth
Assess coding skills at scale for hiring and developer engagement
It's best for companies serious about scaling their technical hiring and employer branding.
Watch out
Potential overage fees for high assessment volume
Strengths
- Pro: Comprehensive assessment covering code quality, logic, and efficiency
- Pro: AI screening saves recruiters significant time weekly
- Pro: Hackathon platform doubles as employer branding tool
- Pro: Live interviews replicate real pair programming
- Pro: Large problem library reduces custom question creation
Weaknesses
- Con: Paid plans may be expensive for very small teams
- Con: Enterprise features require sales contact for pricing
- Con: Platform can feel complex for non-technical recruiters
- Con: Developer community is smaller than some competitors
- Con: Some advanced AI features are relatively new and evolving
Key features
HackerRank
Assess and hire top tech talent with coding challenges
HackerRank's pricing for developers is very generous with a robust free tier.
Watch out
Potential seat minimums for Pro/Enterprise
Strengths
- Pro: Largest question library reduces assessment creation time
- Pro: CodePair live interviews replicate real coding collaboration
- Pro: Plagiarism detection catches copy-paste and AI-generated answers
- Pro: Automated scoring eliminates subjective evaluation bias
- Pro: Free tier available for both companies and individual developers
Weaknesses
- Con: Enterprise pricing is not published and requires sales contact
- Con: Some candidates report assessment UI can be buggy
- Con: Practice problems are less interview-focused than LeetCode
- Con: Company assessment results can feel impersonal to candidates
- Con: Advanced analytics and integrations locked to enterprise plans
Key features
Plans and prices: HackerEarth vs HackerRank
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| HackerEarth |
| hackerearth.com/recruit/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| HackerRank |
| hackerrank.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on HackerEarth pricing and HackerRank pricing.
Key Takeaways
HackerEarth
- Choose if you want assess coding skills at scale for hiring and developer engagement
HackerRank
- Lower entry price: $79/mo, billed monthly vs $99/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, HackerRank leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.6/5 from 634 reviews for HackerEarth, 4.5/5 from 563 reviews for HackerRank).
- HackerRank has the lower entry price: $79/mo, billed monthly (Starter) against $99/mo, billed monthly (Growth) for HackerEarth.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do HackerEarth and HackerRank compare in 2026?
On the data below, HackerRank leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.6/5 from 634 reviews for HackerEarth, 4.5/5 from 563 reviews for HackerRank). HackerRank has the lower entry price: $79/mo, billed monthly (Starter) against $99/mo, billed monthly (Growth) for HackerEarth.
What are HackerEarth and HackerRank used for?
HackerEarth: Assess coding skills at scale for hiring and developer engagement. HackerRank: Assess and hire top tech talent with coding challenges.
What does HackerEarth cost vs HackerRank?
HackerEarth's cheapest paid plan is Growth at $99/mo, billed monthly. HackerRank's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $79/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between HackerEarth and HackerRank?
HackerEarth's main strength: comprehensive assessment covering code quality, logic, and efficiency. HackerRank's main strength: largest question library reduces assessment creation time.