Hunter vs Kaspr: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Hunter and Kaspr side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Hunter leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Hunter
Email finder and verification for outreach
Best for you if:
- • You want good email finder
Kaspr
Instantly access accurate B2B contact data directly from LinkedIn profiles.
Best for you if:
- • You want high accuracy and quantity of contact data, especially phone numbers
| At a Glance | Hunter | Kaspr |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $34/mo flat, billed yearly Starter plan | Free plan, paid from $49/mo, billed monthly Starter plan |
Category | Lead Generation Sales | Lead Generation Sales Intelligence |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 654 reviews | 4.2/5 G2 4.4 · Capterra 3.3 840 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Monthly billing costs about 30% more than yearly | n/a |
Choose Hunter or Kaspr?
Choose Hunter if
- You want good email finder
- You want domain search
Choose Kaspr if
- You want high accuracy and quantity of contact data, especially phone numbers
- You want easy to set up and use with no onboarding required
In-Depth Analysis
Hunter
Email finder and verification for outreach
Hunter has a free plan, then Starter at $34/month billed yearly ($49 monthly), Growth at $104 ($149 monthly) and Scale at $209 ($299 monthly).
Watch out
Monthly billing costs about 30% more than yearly
Strengths
- Pro: Good email finder
- Pro: Domain search
- Pro: Verification included
- Pro: Chrome extension
- Pro: Good accuracy
Weaknesses
- Con: Credit based
- Con: Limited free tier
- Con: Data not always current
- Con: GDPR concerns
- Con: Better for B2B
Key features
Kaspr
Instantly access accurate B2B contact data directly from LinkedIn profiles.
Kaspr's pricing is quite competitive, especially with the generous 'Free' tier offering basic B2B email and phone credits.
Strengths
- Pro: High accuracy and quantity of contact data, especially phone numbers.
- Pro: Easy to set up and use with no onboarding required.
- Pro: Streamlines prospecting by providing data directly on LinkedIn profiles.
- Pro: Offers an API for advanced automation and integration.
Weaknesses
- Con: Specific details on the free tier limitations are not explicitly stated.
- Con: The primary focus appears to be on European contact data, though global reach is implied by 500M+ profiles.
Key features
Plans and prices: Hunter vs Kaspr
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hunter |
| hunter.io/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| Kaspr |
| kaspr.io/pricing read Oct 19, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Hunter pricing and Kaspr pricing.
Key Takeaways
Hunter
- Higher user rating: 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5
Kaspr
- Choose if you want instantly access accurate B2B contact data directly from LinkedIn profiles
What the data shows
On the data below, Hunter leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Hunter has the higher user rating (4.4/5 from 654 reviews for Hunter, 4.2/5 from 840 reviews for Kaspr).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Hunter $34/mo flat, billed yearly; Kaspr $49/mo, billed monthly.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Hunter and Kaspr compare in 2026?
On the data below, Hunter leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Hunter has the higher user rating (4.4/5 from 654 reviews for Hunter, 4.2/5 from 840 reviews for Kaspr). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Hunter $34/mo flat, billed yearly; Kaspr $49/mo, billed monthly. Both have a free plan.
What are Hunter and Kaspr used for?
Hunter: Email finder and verification for outreach. Kaspr: Instantly access accurate B2B contact data directly from LinkedIn profiles.
What does Hunter cost vs Kaspr?
Hunter's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $34/mo flat, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Kaspr's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $49/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Hunter and Kaspr?
Hunter's main strength: good email finder. Kaspr's main strength: high accuracy and quantity of contact data, especially phone numbers.