Import.io vs Octoparse: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Import.io and Octoparse side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Import.io leads on lower entry price; Octoparse leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Import.io
Extract structured website data with no-code tools, scheduled runs, and API access
Best for you if:
- • Analysts, data teams, and developers who need recurring web data for research, analytics, and business applications
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $9/mo, billed monthly Starter (annual billing) plan | Free plan, paid from $69/mo, billed monthly Standard plan |
Category | Data & Databases ETL & Data Pipelines | Automation Developer Tools |
Rating | n/a | 4.8/5 G2 4.8 52 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | $7 per 1,000 overage on Standard tier | Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan |
Choose Import.io or Octoparse?
Choose Import.io if
- Analysts, data teams, and developers who need recurring web data for research, analytics, and business applications
- You want extract structured website data with no-code tools, scheduled runs, and API access
- Budget matters ($9/mo, billed monthly vs $69/mo, billed monthly)
- You work in data & databases, not automation
Choose Octoparse if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site
- You want details on Standard and Professional tiers plus a 5-day money-back window
- You work in automation, not data & databases
In-Depth Analysis
Import.io
Extract structured website data with no-code tools, scheduled runs, and API access
Import.io's pricing is fair for a no-code web scraping platform, with the $9 Starter tier offering a low entry point for light users, but the jump to $199 for Standard is steep, especially with $7 per 1,000 overage costs.
Watch out
$7 per 1,000 overage on Standard tier
Key features
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
The Free tier is generous for local scraping, and Standard at $69/mo is fair for cloud extraction with proxies and CAPTCHA solving.
Watch out
Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan
Strengths
- Pro: A real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.
- Pro: Details on Standard and Professional tiers plus a 5-day money-back window.
- Pro: Cloud concurrency is explicit: 3 runs on Standard, 20 on Professional.
Weaknesses
- Con: Free cannot schedule in the cloud. Overnight jobs need a paid plan.
- Con: Not an API-first crawler. Engineering teams that want code usually pick Scrapy, Crawlee, or Browserless.
Key features
Plans and prices: Import.io vs Octoparse
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Import.io |
| import.io/pricing read Oct 26, 2026 |
| Octoparse |
| octoparse.com/pricing read Nov 1, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Import.io pricing and Octoparse pricing.
Key Takeaways
Import.io
- Lower entry price: $9/mo, billed monthly vs $69/mo, billed monthly
Octoparse
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Import.io leads on lower entry price; Octoparse leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Octoparse has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 52 reviews); Import.io has none we can show.
- Import.io has the lower entry price: $9/mo, billed monthly (Starter (annual billing)) against $69/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Octoparse.
- Only Octoparse has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Import.io and Octoparse compare in 2026?
On the data below, Import.io leads on lower entry price; Octoparse leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Octoparse has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 52 reviews); Import.io has none we can show. Import.io has the lower entry price: $9/mo, billed monthly (Starter (annual billing)) against $69/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Octoparse. Only Octoparse has a free plan.
What are Import.io and Octoparse used for?
Import.io: Extract structured website data with no-code tools, scheduled runs, and API access. Octoparse: No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction.
What does Import.io cost vs Octoparse?
Import.io's cheapest paid plan is Starter (annual billing) at $9/mo, billed monthly. Octoparse's cheapest paid plan is Standard at $69/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 1, 2026.
What's the main difference between Import.io and Octoparse?
Import.io focuses on extract structured website data with no-code tools, scheduled runs, and API access. Octoparse's main strength: a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.