Kobiton vs Quash: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Kobiton and Quash side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Quash leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Kobiton
Accelerate mobile app delivery with intelligent, secure, and automated testing on real devices.
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly reduces regression cycle time (from days to hours)
Quash
AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Kobiton | Quash |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $83/mo, billed monthly Startup plan | Free plan |
Category | Testing & QA DevOps | Testing & QA Automation |
Rating | 4.3/5 G2 4.3 39 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Overage fees for exceeding included minutes | n/a |
Choose Kobiton or Quash?
Choose Kobiton if
- You want significantly reduces regression cycle time (from days to hours)
- You want increases automation productivity with AI-driven features like no-code and self-healing tests
Choose Quash if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation
- You want tests adapt to UI changes, loading states, and data differences, reducing maintenance
In-Depth Analysis
Kobiton
Accelerate mobile app delivery with intelligent, secure, and automated testing on real devices.
Kobiton's pricing is on the higher side for smaller teams, with the 'Startup' tier at $83/month offering only 500 minutes.
Watch out
Overage fees for exceeding included minutes
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly reduces regression cycle time (from days to hours).
- Pro: Increases automation productivity with AI-driven features like no-code and self-healing tests.
- Pro: Provides access to a broad range of real iOS and Android devices for accurate testing.
- Pro: Enhances collaboration between QA and development teams with integrated tools.
- Pro: Offers flexible deployment options to suit various enterprise needs.
Weaknesses
- Con: No explicit mention of a free tier or trial, suggesting it's a paid enterprise solution.
- Con: Requires integration into existing CI/CD pipelines, which might have an initial setup overhead.
Key features
Quash
AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
Quash offers a very generous free tier, providing core AI-powered testing features without any cost.
Strengths
- Pro: Eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation.
- Pro: Tests adapt to UI changes, loading states, and data differences, reducing maintenance.
- Pro: Validates both UI and backend responses in a single test run.
- Pro: Supports execution on various devices (local, emulators, cloud) without infrastructure setup.
- Pro: Provides clear, context-rich reports for easy understanding of failures.
Weaknesses
- Con: Currently only available for Apple devices (as stated on pricing page for free trial).
- Con: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and scheduled runs are limited to the Enterprise plan.
Key features
Plans and prices: Kobiton vs Quash
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Kobiton |
| kobiton.com/pricing read Oct 15, 2026 |
| Quash |
| quashbugs.com/pricing read Sep 28, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Kobiton pricing and Quash pricing.
Key Takeaways
Kobiton
- Choose if you want accelerate mobile app delivery with intelligent, secure, and automated testing on real devices
Quash
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Quash leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Kobiton has a published user rating (4.3/5 from 39 reviews); Quash has none we can show.
- Kobiton starts at $83/mo, billed monthly; Quash has no public paid plan price on file.
- Only Quash has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Kobiton and Quash compare in 2026?
On the data below, Quash leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Kobiton has a published user rating (4.3/5 from 39 reviews); Quash has none we can show. Kobiton starts at $83/mo, billed monthly; Quash has no public paid plan price on file. Only Quash has a free plan.
What are Kobiton and Quash used for?
Kobiton: Accelerate mobile app delivery with intelligent, secure, and automated testing on real devices. Quash: AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
What does Kobiton cost vs Quash?
Kobiton's cheapest paid plan is Startup at $83/mo, billed monthly. Quash has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 15, 2026.
What's the main difference between Kobiton and Quash?
Kobiton's main strength: significantly reduces regression cycle time (from days to hours). Quash's main strength: eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation.