Quash
UnclaimedAI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
Visit WebsiteFreemiumVisit Website
Tracked since2026
0 reviews trackedThe Bottom Line
Entry price
Free plan available, paid tiers above
Biggest pro
Eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation.
Biggest con
Currently only available for Apple devices (as stated on pricing page for free trial).
TL;DR - Quash
- Automates mobile app testing using natural language prompts.
- Adapts to UI changes and validates both UI and backend in one run.
- Increases test coverage and speeds up test suite creation significantly.
Pricing: Free plan available
Best for: Growing teams
What is Quash?
Quash is an AI-powered platform designed to automate mobile app testing and quality assurance (QA). It allows users to run functional and visual tests on mobile applications using natural language descriptions, eliminating the need for scripting or complex selectors. The platform's AI agent interprets plain language instructions to perform taps, swipes, typing, navigation, and form interactions, adapting to UI changes and dynamic screens during execution.
This tool is ideal for solo developers, small teams, and large enterprises looking to streamline their mobile QA processes, increase test coverage, and reduce testing costs. It helps teams catch issues before they reach production by providing a unified platform for test generation, execution, and reporting, complete with detailed analytics and debugging insights. Quash aims to make mobile testing faster, more efficient, and less prone to breaking with UI changes, integrating both UI and backend validation in a single run.
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation.
- Tests adapt to UI changes, loading states, and data differences, reducing maintenance.
- Validates both UI and backend responses in a single test run.
- Supports execution on various devices (local, emulators, cloud) without infrastructure setup.
- Provides clear, context-rich reports for easy understanding of failures.
Cons
- Currently only available for Apple devices (as stated on pricing page for free trial).
- Advanced features like CI/CD integration and scheduled runs are limited to the Enterprise plan.
Preview
Key Features
Intent-driven Test Execution (natural language)Test ManagementAPI & DB ValidationsDevice Lab (local, emulators, cloud devices)Detailed Test Reports with logs, screenshots, and contextAutomated frameworks with AI-driven automationComplete analytics across test coverage, results, and product qualityRole-based access control
Pricing Plans
Pricing checked Jun 1, 2026
Starter
Free
- Prompt-to-execution testing
- Vision + reasoning models
- Access to AI models: Claude Sonnet 4.5, Haiku, Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- Smart test suites
- Parallel execution
- Backend/API validations
- Test data support
- Invite unlimited team members, with roles and permissions
Enterprise
Contact Us
- Includes everything in the Free plan
- Scheduled regression runs
- Agentic app monitoring
- Deep workflow integrations (CI/CD, issue trackers, analytics, data stores)
- Custom SLAs and onboarding
- Dedicated infra options (cloud or VPC)
- Advanced access management
- Priority support for scaling teams
Reviews
$99Free with your review
Write a reviewReview Quash, get a free AI guide
Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.
Best Quash Alternatives
Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.
BrowserStackPaid
Test on real browsers and devices, anywhere
Sauce LabsPaid
Cross-browser testing cloud platform
ApplitoolsFreemium
Visual AI testing for web and mobile apps
AppiumFree
Automate mobile app testing across platforms
TestimFreemium
AI-powered web test automation that maintains itself
KobitonPaid
Accelerate mobile app delivery with intelligent, secure, and automated testing on real devices.
MablPaid
Intelligent test automation platform
Still deciding?
Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.
Explore More
Quash FAQ
How does Quash simplify mobile app testing?
Quash simplifies mobile app testing by allowing users to create functional and visual tests using natural language descriptions, eliminating the need for scripting or complex selectors. Its AI agent interprets these plain language instructions to perform various interactions and adapts to UI changes during execution.
Which teams benefit most from using Quash?
Quash is ideal for solo developers, small teams, and large enterprises aiming to streamline their mobile QA processes and increase test coverage. It helps teams catch issues before they reach production by providing a unified platform for test generation, execution, and reporting.
How does Quash compare to Appium for mobile testing?
Quash differentiates itself from tools like Appium by eliminating the need for scripting and selectors, allowing tests to be created using plain language. It also features AI that adapts tests to UI changes, loading states, and data differences, reducing maintenance overhead.
What kind of mobile applications can Quash test?
Quash is designed to test mobile applications, specifically those running on Apple devices. It supports functional and visual tests, adapting to UI changes and dynamic screens during execution to ensure comprehensive coverage.
Does Quash include a free tier?
Yes, Quash is available on a free tier, with additional paid plans offering more usage and advanced features. These paid plans cater to growing needs and provide enhanced capabilities for mobile app testing and QA automation.
What are the primary limitations of Quash?
Currently, Quash is only available for Apple devices, which limits its applicability to other mobile operating systems. Additionally, advanced features such as CI/CD integration and scheduled test runs are exclusively available in the Enterprise plan.
How does Quash handle UI changes in mobile apps?
Quash's AI agent is designed to adapt to UI changes, loading states, and data differences within mobile applications. This capability reduces test maintenance and ensures that tests remain robust even as the app evolves.
Source: quashbugs.com