Mabl vs Quash: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Mabl and Quash side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Mabl
Intelligent test automation platform
Best for you if:
- • You want AI test automation
Quash
AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Mabl | Quash |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $500/mo, billed monthly Core plan | Free plan |
Category | Testing & QA Automation | Testing & QA Automation |
Rating | 4.2/5 Capterra 4.0 · G2 4.4 107 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Potential for additional costs for more apps beyond 1 in Free tier. | n/a |
Choose Mabl or Quash?
Choose Mabl if
- You want AI test automation
- You want low-code testing
Choose Quash if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation
- You want tests adapt to UI changes, loading states, and data differences, reducing maintenance
In-Depth Analysis
Mabl
Intelligent test automation platform
Mabl's pricing starts with a generous Free tier, but the jump to the Core tier at $500/month is significant, making it expensive for small teams.
Watch out
Potential for additional costs for more apps beyond 1 in Free tier.
Strengths
- Pro: AI test automation
- Pro: Low-code testing
- Pro: Good for QA
- Pro: Auto-healing tests
- Pro: Good integrations
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Enterprise focus
- Con: Limited customization
- Con: Per-user pricing
Key features
Quash
AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
Quash offers a very generous free tier, providing core AI-powered testing features without any cost.
Strengths
- Pro: Eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation.
- Pro: Tests adapt to UI changes, loading states, and data differences, reducing maintenance.
- Pro: Validates both UI and backend responses in a single test run.
- Pro: Supports execution on various devices (local, emulators, cloud) without infrastructure setup.
- Pro: Provides clear, context-rich reports for easy understanding of failures.
Weaknesses
- Con: Currently only available for Apple devices (as stated on pricing page for free trial).
- Con: Advanced features like CI/CD integration and scheduled runs are limited to the Enterprise plan.
Key features
Plans and prices: Mabl vs Quash
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Mabl |
| mabl.com/pricing read Sep 30, 2026 |
| Quash |
| quashbugs.com/pricing read Sep 28, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Mabl pricing and Quash pricing.
Key Takeaways
Mabl
- Choose if you want intelligent test automation platform
Quash
- Choose if you want AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- Only Mabl has a published user rating (4.2/5 from 107 reviews); Quash has none we can show.
- Mabl starts at $500/mo, billed monthly; Quash has no public paid plan price on file.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Mabl and Quash compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. Only Mabl has a published user rating (4.2/5 from 107 reviews); Quash has none we can show. Mabl starts at $500/mo, billed monthly; Quash has no public paid plan price on file. Both have a free plan.
What are Mabl and Quash used for?
Mabl: Intelligent test automation platform. Quash: AI-powered mobile app testing and QA automation for human-like functional and visual tests.
What does Mabl cost vs Quash?
Mabl's cheapest paid plan is Core at $500/mo, billed monthly. Quash has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Sep 30, 2026.
What's the main difference between Mabl and Quash?
Mabl's main strength: AI test automation. Quash's main strength: eliminates the need for scripting and selectors, using plain language for test creation.