Skip to content

Loom vs QuackScreen: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Loom and QuackScreen comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: Loom wins this matchup. Our overall Screen Recording pick is LogRocket. Our free Screen Recording pick is OBS Studio. Pick QuackScreen if you need screenshot tools.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked Aug 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

Loom

Record screen and camera for async video messages

Best for you if:

  • • You need screen recording features specifically
  • Async video messaging for teams
  • Screen and camera recording

QuackScreen

Record and share screen clips instantly from your menu bar

Best for you if:

  • • You need screenshot tools features specifically
  • Native macOS screen recorder and screenshot tool with notch integration.
  • Enables quick drag-and-drop sharing of captures directly from the menu bar.
At a Glance
LoomLoom
QuackScreenQuackScreen
Starts at
FreeFree tier available
FreeFree tier available
Best For
Screen RecordingScreenshot Tools
Rating
4.7/5-
Free plan
Yes Yes

Choose Loom or QuackScreen?

Loom

Choose Loom if

Record screen and camera for async video messages

  • Faster than writing long emails
  • AI transcriptions in 50+ languages
  • Easy screen and camera recording
  • Your work is screen recording-shaped, not screenshot tools-shaped
QuackScreen

Choose QuackScreen if

Record and share screen clips instantly from your menu bar

  • Streamlined workflow for sharing captures without uploads or links.
  • Integrated annotation tools for quick markup of screenshots.
  • Optimized for macOS and Apple silicon, with a native feel.
  • Your work is screenshot tools-shaped, not screen recording-shaped
FeatureLoomQuackScreen
Pricing ModelFreemiumFreemium
User Rating
4.7/5
2,937 reviews
No ratings yet
Categories
Screen RecordingCommunication
Screenshot ToolsScreen Recording

In-Depth Analysis

LoomLoom

Record screen and camera for async video messages

Starts at Free
Good value

Loom's pricing is generally fair, offering a generous free tier for basic use.

Watch out

AI features are an additional $5/user/month.

Strengths

  • +Faster than writing long emails
  • +AI transcriptions in 50+ languages
  • +Easy screen and camera recording

Weaknesses

  • -Video quality limited on free tier
  • -Storage limits for free users

Key features

Screen recordingCamera recordingTranscriptionsCommentsAnalyticsEmbeds

QuackScreenQuackScreen

Record and share screen clips instantly from your menu bar

Starts at Free
Great value

The pricing for QuackScreen is exceptionally fair and generous, especially with its robust free tier and affordable lifetime option.

Strengths

  • +Streamlined workflow for sharing captures without uploads or links.
  • +Integrated annotation tools for quick markup of screenshots.
  • +Optimized for macOS and Apple silicon, with a native feel.
  • +Lifetime license available with no subscriptions.

Weaknesses

  • -Limited to macOS and Apple silicon, excluding older Macs.
  • -Free version has recording length limits and watermarks.
  • -Requires the menu bar to be on the notched display for correct functionality with multiple monitors.

Key features

Short, focused screen recordings (capped at 3 minutes in free version)Capture full display or single windowAutomatic cursor-following zoom in recordingsOne-click screenshots with in-app annotation editor (pen, arrow, rectangle, highlight, blur)Microphone selection for narrationSystem-wide keyboard shortcuts for recording and screenshots

Pricing: Loom vs QuackScreen

PlanLoomQuackScreen
Tier 1
Free
Starter
Free
Free
Tier 2
$15
Business
€20
Lifetime
Tier 3
$20
Business + AI
N/A
Tier 4
Custom
Enterprise
N/A

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Loom pricing and QuackScreen pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: Loom

Want the highest-rated option?

Loom is rated 4.7/5. QuackScreen has no ratings yet.

Go with: Loom

Value user reviews?

Loom: 2,937 reviews (4.7/5). QuackScreen: no ratings yet.

Go with: Loom

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

Loom is a screen recording tool. QuackScreen is in screenshot tools. Pick the category that matches your needs.

3

How important are ratings?

Loom is rated 4.7/5; QuackScreen has no ratings yet.

Key Takeaways

Loom

  • Free tier available
  • Our pick for this comparison

QuackScreen

  • Better fit for screenshot tools

The Bottom Line

Loom wins this matchup. Our overall Screen Recording pick is LogRocket. Our free Screen Recording pick is OBS Studio.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Loom or QuackScreen better?

Loom is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.

What are Loom and QuackScreen used for?

Loom: Record screen and camera for async video messages. QuackScreen: Record and share screen clips instantly from your menu bar.

What does Loom cost vs QuackScreen?

Loom is freemium (free tier + paid plans). QuackScreen is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools