Make vs Octoparse: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Make and Octoparse side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Make leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Make
Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder
Best for you if:
- • You want visual builder
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
Best for you if:
- • You want a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site
| At a Glance | Make | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $10.59/mo, billed monthly Core plan | Free plan, paid from $69/mo, billed monthly Standard plan |
Category | Workflow Automation Automation | Automation Developer Tools |
Rating | 4.0/5 PeerSpot 4.0 18 reviews | 4.8/5 G2 4.8 52 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Every module counts as 1 credit -- triggers, filters, routers, and actions all consume credits (only error handlers and Router modules are free) | Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan |
Choose Make or Octoparse?
Choose Make if
- You want visual builder
- You want more powerful than Zapier
- Budget matters ($10.59/mo, billed monthly vs $69/mo, billed monthly)
- You work in workflow automation, not automation
Choose Octoparse if
- You want a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site
- You want details on Standard and Professional tiers plus a 5-day money-back window
- You work in automation, not workflow automation
In-Depth Analysis
Make
Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder
Make is the best value in workflow automation for most teams.
Watch out
Every module counts as 1 credit -- triggers, filters, routers, and actions all consume credits (only error handlers and Router modules are free)
Strengths
- Pro: Visual builder
- Pro: More powerful than Zapier
- Pro: Better value
Weaknesses
- Con: Steeper learning curve
- Con: Complex for simple tasks
Key features
Octoparse
No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
The Free tier is generous for local scraping, and Standard at $69/mo is fair for cloud extraction with proxies and CAPTCHA solving.
Watch out
Free tier is local only, cloud extraction requires paid plan
Strengths
- Pro: A real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.
- Pro: Details on Standard and Professional tiers plus a 5-day money-back window.
- Pro: Cloud concurrency is explicit: 3 runs on Standard, 20 on Professional.
Weaknesses
- Con: Free cannot schedule in the cloud. Overnight jobs need a paid plan.
- Con: Not an API-first crawler. Engineering teams that want code usually pick Scrapy, Crawlee, or Browserless.
Key features
Plans and prices: Make vs Octoparse
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Make |
| make.com read Sep 27, 2026 |
| Octoparse |
| octoparse.com/pricing read Oct 19, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Make pricing and Octoparse pricing.
Key Takeaways
Make
- Lower entry price: $10.59/mo, billed monthly vs $69/mo, billed monthly
Octoparse
- Choose if you want no-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction
What the data shows
On the data below, Make leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.0/5 from 18 reviews for Make, 4.8/5 from 52 reviews for Octoparse; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- Make has the lower entry price: $10.59/mo, billed monthly (Core) against $69/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Octoparse.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Make and Octoparse compare in 2026?
On the data below, Make leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.0/5 from 18 reviews for Make, 4.8/5 from 52 reviews for Octoparse; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Make has the lower entry price: $10.59/mo, billed monthly (Core) against $69/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Octoparse. Both have a free plan.
What are Make and Octoparse used for?
Make: Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder. Octoparse: No-code web scraping with cloud and local extraction.
What does Make cost vs Octoparse?
Make's cheapest paid plan is Core at $10.59/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Octoparse's cheapest paid plan is Standard at $69/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 19, 2026.
What's the main difference between Make and Octoparse?
Make's main strength: visual builder. Octoparse's main strength: a real free forever plan, not a 7-day trial. 50K export rows is enough to test a site.