Material Security vs Sophos: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Material Security and Sophos side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Material Security leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Material Security
The first detection and response platform built for the cloud workspace.
Best for you if:
- • You want purpose-built for cloud workspaces (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365), not retrofitted
Sophos
Unified enterprise security for midsize businesses
Best for you if:
- • You want enterprise security
| At a Glance | Material Security | Sophos |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $4/mo, billed monthly Essentials plan | From $44.99/year Home plan |
Category | Security Security Monitoring | Security Security Monitoring |
Rating | 4.9/5 G2 4.9 20 reviews | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 · Capterra 4.5 2,668 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | ATO Resilience is an add-on, increasing base cost. | Business tiers require custom quotes, implying higher costs. |
Choose Material Security or Sophos?
Choose Material Security if
- You want purpose-built for cloud workspaces (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365), not retrofitted
- You want provides holistic security across email, files, and accounts from a single platform
Choose Sophos if
- You want enterprise security
- You want good endpoint protection
In-Depth Analysis
Material Security
The first detection and response platform built for the cloud workspace.
Material Security's pricing for Essentials at $4/month and Advanced at $6/month is competitive for the extensive cloud workspace security features offered.
Watch out
ATO Resilience is an add-on, increasing base cost.
Strengths
- Pro: Purpose-built for cloud workspaces (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365), not retrofitted
- Pro: Provides holistic security across email, files, and accounts from a single platform
- Pro: Automates threat detection and response, reducing manual effort and burnout for security teams
- Pro: Offers full lifecycle protection: detection, containment, and resilience
- Pro: Seamlessly integrates into existing workflows and is extensible via APIs and event hooks
Weaknesses
- Con: No free tier or trial explicitly mentioned on the provided pages
- Con: Requires integration with existing cloud workspace environments
Key features
Sophos
Unified enterprise security for midsize businesses
Sophos's pricing for its Home tier at $44.99/year is fair for personal use, offering good value for up to 10 devices.
Watch out
Business tiers require custom quotes, implying higher costs.
Strengths
- Pro: Enterprise security
- Pro: Good endpoint protection
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Good support
- Pro: Comprehensive
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive
- Con: Complex platform
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Resource usage
- Con: Better alternatives exist
Key features
Plans and prices: Material Security vs Sophos
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Material Security |
| material.security/pricing read Oct 22, 2026 |
| Sophos |
| sophos.com read Oct 4, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Material Security pricing and Sophos pricing.
Key Takeaways
Material Security
- Higher user rating: 4.9/5 vs 4.6/5
Sophos
- Choose if you want unified enterprise security for midsize businesses
What the data shows
On the data below, Material Security leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Material Security has the higher user rating (4.9/5 from 20 reviews for Material Security, 4.6/5 from 2,668 reviews for Sophos).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Material Security $4/mo, billed monthly; Sophos $44.99/year.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Material Security and Sophos compare in 2026?
On the data below, Material Security leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Material Security has the higher user rating (4.9/5 from 20 reviews for Material Security, 4.6/5 from 2,668 reviews for Sophos). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Material Security $4/mo, billed monthly; Sophos $44.99/year.
What are Material Security and Sophos used for?
Material Security: The first detection and response platform built for the cloud workspace. Sophos: Unified enterprise security for midsize businesses.
What does Material Security cost vs Sophos?
Material Security's cheapest paid plan is Essentials at $4/mo, billed monthly. Sophos's cheapest paid plan is Home at $44.99/year. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 22, 2026.
What's the main difference between Material Security and Sophos?
Material Security's main strength: purpose-built for cloud workspaces (Google Workspace, Microsoft 365), not retrofitted. Sophos's main strength: enterprise security.