qsa.sh vs Sift: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for qsa.sh and Sift side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, qsa.sh leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
qsa.sh
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
Sift
Stop fraud fast and grow revenue faster with AI-powered digital trust and safety solutions.
Best for you if:
- • You want fraud prevention
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $5/mo, billed monthly Full Pro plan | From $500/mo, billed monthly Starter plan |
Category | Security Vulnerability Scanning | Security AI & Automation |
Rating | n/a | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 610 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | n/a | Overage fees run 20-50% higher than base per-event rates, volume spikes hurt |
Choose qsa.sh or Sift?
Choose qsa.sh if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy
- You want transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box
- Budget matters ($5/mo, billed monthly vs $500/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Sift if
- You want fraud prevention
- You want machine learning
In-Depth Analysis
qsa.sh
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
The pricing is generous for casual use with a free tier that covers the top 1,000 ports, but the $5/mo Full Pro tier is a steal for continuous scanning of all ports, while $7/scan for Deep is steep for occasional use.
Strengths
- Pro: Zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy.
- Pro: Transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box.
- Pro: Strictly limited to scanning your own IP, with consent gate and opt-out for operators.
Weaknesses
- Con: IPv4 only, IPv6 connections are refused.
- Con: Free scan limited to one per 24 hours and only top 1,000 ports; Full and Deep require payment.
Key features
Sift
Stop fraud fast and grow revenue faster with AI-powered digital trust and safety solutions.
Unlike Riskified or Forter, Sift does not absorb chargeback liability, you get risk scores and decision tools, not a financial guarantee.
Watch out
Overage fees run 20-50% higher than base per-event rates, volume spikes hurt
Strengths
- Pro: Fraud prevention
- Pro: Machine learning
- Pro: Good for e-commerce
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Enterprise ready
Weaknesses
- Con: Expensive
- Con: Complex implementation
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Per-decision pricing
- Con: Enterprise focus
Key features
Plans and prices: qsa.sh vs Sift
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| qsa.sh |
| qsa.sh/pricing read Oct 20, 2026 |
| Sift |
| sift.com read Oct 3, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on qsa.sh pricing and Sift pricing.
Key Takeaways
qsa.sh
- Lower entry price: $5/mo, billed monthly vs $500/mo, billed monthly
- Has a free plan
Sift
- Choose if you want stop fraud fast and grow revenue faster with AI-powered digital trust and safety solutions
What the data shows
On the data below, qsa.sh leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Sift has a published user rating (4.6/5 from 610 reviews); qsa.sh has none we can show.
- qsa.sh has the lower entry price: $5/mo, billed monthly (Full Pro) against $500/mo, billed monthly (Starter) for Sift.
- Only qsa.sh has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do qsa.sh and Sift compare in 2026?
On the data below, qsa.sh leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Sift has a published user rating (4.6/5 from 610 reviews); qsa.sh has none we can show. qsa.sh has the lower entry price: $5/mo, billed monthly (Full Pro) against $500/mo, billed monthly (Starter) for Sift. Only qsa.sh has a free plan.
What are qsa.sh and Sift used for?
qsa.sh: External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal. Sift: Stop fraud fast and grow revenue faster with AI-powered digital trust and safety solutions.
What does qsa.sh cost vs Sift?
qsa.sh's cheapest paid plan is Full Pro at $5/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Sift's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $500/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 20, 2026.
What's the main difference between qsa.sh and Sift?
qsa.sh's main strength: zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy. Sift's main strength: fraud prevention.