Refuse vs Snyk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Refuse and Snyk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Refuse leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Refuse
Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly enhances software supply chain security by preventing vulnerable package installations
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Best for you if:
- • You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
| At a Glance | Refuse | Snyk |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $5/mo, billed monthly Hosted Pro plan | Free plan, paid from $25/mo, billed monthly Team plan |
Category | Security Developer Tools | Security Testing & QA |
Rating | n/a | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 157 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Potential for overage fees if exceeding scan limits | Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines |
Choose Refuse or Snyk?
Choose Refuse if
- You want significantly enhances software supply chain security by preventing vulnerable package installations
- You want supports a broad range of package managers and development environments
- Budget matters ($5/mo, billed monthly vs $25/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Snyk if
- You want developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- You want broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
In-Depth Analysis
Refuse
Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD
Refuse offers a very generous pricing model, with both a self-hosted and a hosted free tier at $0.
Watch out
Potential for overage fees if exceeding scan limits
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly enhances software supply chain security by preventing vulnerable package installations.
- Pro: Supports a broad range of package managers and development environments.
- Pro: Offers flexible deployment options including a free self-hosted solution and a generous free hosted tier.
- Pro: Provides specific safe version suggestions when blocking vulnerable packages.
- Pro: Easy to install and integrate into existing workflows (shell, CI/CD, agents).
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires an additional step in the package installation workflow, which might introduce a slight overhead.
- Con: The hosted Pro tier with higher scan limits is planned for future release.
Key features
Snyk
Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
Snyk Free is usable for individual developers but test limits are tight (200 SCA, 100 SAST, 100 container tests/month).
Watch out
Free tier test limits burn through quickly in CI/CD pipelines
Strengths
- Pro: Developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests
- Pro: Broad coverage across code, dependencies, containers, IaC, and DAST in a single platform
- Pro: Automated fix pull requests save significant remediation time
- Pro: Generous free tier with 200 open-source and 100 code tests per month
- Pro: AI-powered prioritization focuses teams on the most exploitable vulnerabilities first
Weaknesses
- Con: Team plan limited to 10 developers per organization, requiring Ignite for larger teams
- Con: Ignite tier at $1,260/year per developer is expensive for mid-size teams
- Con: DAST scanning limited to 10 targets even on Ignite plan
- Con: Advanced features like custom rules and SSO only available on Ignite and above
- Con: Can produce noisy results on large monorepos without careful policy tuning
Key features
Plans and prices: Refuse vs Snyk
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Refuse |
| refuse.dev/pricing read Oct 19, 2026 |
| Snyk |
| snyk.io/plans read Oct 23, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Refuse pricing and Snyk pricing.
Key Takeaways
Refuse
- Lower entry price: $5/mo, billed monthly vs $25/mo, billed monthly
Snyk
- Choose if you want secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production
What the data shows
On the data below, Refuse leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); Refuse has none we can show.
- Refuse has the lower entry price: $5/mo, billed monthly (Hosted Pro) against $25/mo, billed monthly (Team) for Snyk.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Refuse and Snyk compare in 2026?
On the data below, Refuse leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Snyk has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 157 reviews); Refuse has none we can show. Refuse has the lower entry price: $5/mo, billed monthly (Hosted Pro) against $25/mo, billed monthly (Team) for Snyk. Both have a free plan.
What are Refuse and Snyk used for?
Refuse: Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD. Snyk: Secure your code, dependencies, containers, and IaC from dev to production.
What does Refuse cost vs Snyk?
Refuse's cheapest paid plan is Hosted Pro at $5/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Snyk's cheapest paid plan is Team at $25/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 23, 2026.
What's the main difference between Refuse and Snyk?
Refuse's main strength: significantly enhances software supply chain security by preventing vulnerable package installations. Snyk's main strength: developer-friendly workflow integrates security scanning directly into IDEs and pull requests.