Wazuh vs Kandji: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between Wazuh and Kandji comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Bottom line: Wazuh wins this matchup. Pick Kandji if you need security.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Wazuh
Open-source security monitoring
Best for you if:
- • You want a fully free tool (Kandji requires payment)
Kandji
Unified endpoint, identity, and compliance management
Best for you if:
- • You want unifies endpoint, identity, and compliance in one platform, reducing tool sprawl
| At a Glance | Kandji | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free 100% free | Free Free plan |
Category | Security Monitoring Vulnerability Scanning | Security Compliance |
Rating | 4.5/5 G2 4.5 71 reviews | 4.7/5 G2 4.8 · Capterra 4.8 · PeerSpot 4.4 319 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Potential overage fees for extra endpoints |
Choose Wazuh or Kandji?
Choose Wazuh if
- You want a fully free tool (Kandji requires payment)
- You want open source SIEM
- You want good features
- You work in security monitoring, not security
Choose Kandji if
- You want unifies endpoint, identity, and compliance in one platform, reducing tool sprawl
- You want AI-powered automation saves an average of 50 hours per month per team
- You work in security, not security monitoring
In-Depth Analysis
Wazuh
Open-source security monitoring
Wazuh's pricing is exceptionally generous, offering a full-featured open-source SIEM/XDR solution for $0.
Strengths
- Pro: Open source SIEM
- Pro: Good features
- Pro: Self-hostable
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Free
Weaknesses
- Con: Complex setup
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Resource intensive
- Con: Documentation gaps
- Con: Enterprise features paid
Key features
Kandji
Unified endpoint, identity, and compliance management
Kandji's pricing is entirely opaque, with all tiers listed as 'Request a quote' and only annual billing, suggesting enterprise-level cost that could be expensive for small teams.
Watch out
Potential overage fees for extra endpoints
Strengths
- Pro: Unifies endpoint, identity, and compliance in one platform, reducing tool sprawl
- Pro: AI-powered automation saves an average of 50 hours per month per team
- Pro: High customer satisfaction with a 4.75/5 G2 rating from over 700 reviews
Weaknesses
- Con: Pricing is not publicly listed, requiring a demo or quote request
- Con: May require significant initial setup to fully integrate all three domains
Key features
Pricing: Wazuh vs Kandji
| Plan | Wazuh | Kandji |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | Free Open Source | Request a quote Workforce Identity |
| Tier 2 | Free Cloud | Request a quote Endpoint Management |
| Tier 3 | N/A | Request a quote Endpoint Detection & Response |
| Tier 4 | N/A | Request a quote Vulnerability Management |
| Tier 5 | N/A | Request a quote Compliance Automation |
| Tier 6 | N/A | Request a quote Trust Center |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Wazuh pricing and Kandji pricing.
Key Takeaways
Wazuh
- Completely free
- Our pick for this comparison
Kandji
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5
- Larger review base (319 reviews)
- Better fit for security
The Bottom Line
Wazuh wins this matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Wazuh or Kandji better in 2026?
Wazuh wins this matchup. Pick Wazuh for security monitoring workflows (main strength: open source SIEM). Pick Kandji for security workflows (main strength: unifies endpoint, identity, and compliance in one platform, reducing tool sprawl).
What are Wazuh and Kandji used for?
Wazuh: Open-source security monitoring. Kandji: Unified endpoint, identity, and compliance management.
What does Wazuh cost vs Kandji?
Wazuh is free. Kandji pricing is on their site.
What's the main difference between Wazuh and Kandji?
Wazuh's main strength: open source SIEM. Kandji's main strength: unifies endpoint, identity, and compliance in one platform, reducing tool sprawl.