Skip to content

Aqueduct vs Grafana OnCall: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Aqueduct and Grafana OnCall comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: Grafana OnCall is our overall pick for incident management workflows. Pick Aqueduct if you need AI agents.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked May 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

Aqueduct

The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution.

Best for you if:

  • • You need AI agents features specifically
  • AI SRE for automated incident investigation and resolution.
  • Correlates data across observability, code, and tickets to provide clear next steps.

Grafana OnCall

On-call management for Grafana

Best for you if:

  • • You want to try before committing
  • • You need incident management features specifically
  • Grafana OnCall is an open-source on-call management and alerting system
  • It routes alerts, manages schedules, and escalates incidents integrated with Grafana
At a Glance
AqueductAqueduct
Grafana OnCallGrafana OnCall
Starts at
Paid
$20/user/monthPro
Best For
AI AgentsIncident Management
Rating
--

Choose Aqueduct or Grafana OnCall?

Aqueduct

Choose Aqueduct if

The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution.

  • Significantly reduces Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR)
  • Decreases alert fatigue and burnout for on-call teams
  • Prevents repeat incidents by identifying risks and learning from past events
  • Your work is AI agents-shaped, not incident management-shaped
Grafana OnCall

Choose Grafana OnCall if

On-call management for Grafana

  • Open source on-call
  • Grafana integration
  • Good alerting
  • You want a free tier before you commit
  • Your work is incident management-shaped, not AI agents-shaped
FeatureAqueductGrafana OnCall
Pricing ModelPaidFreemium
User RatingNo ratings yet
4.5/5
222 reviews
Categories
AI AgentsIncident Management
Incident ManagementDevOps

In-Depth Analysis

AqueductAqueduct

The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution.

Strengths

  • +Significantly reduces Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR)
  • +Decreases alert fatigue and burnout for on-call teams
  • +Prevents repeat incidents by identifying risks and learning from past events
  • +Rapid deployment and day-one value with existing tool integrations
  • +Provides transparent, evidence-backed reasoning, not a black box

Weaknesses

  • -Requires integration with existing observability and operational tools
  • -Initial trust-building phase may be needed for read-write actions
  • -Effectiveness improves over time with continuous learning and feedback

Key features

Correlates alerts, logs, metrics, traces, and ticketsGuides through RCA, mitigation, and postmortemsIntegrates with observability tools, code, ticketing, docs, and chatProvides evidence-backed investigations and prioritized next stepsContinuously learns from investigations and user correctionsAnalyzes incidents, logs, and customer tickets to surface risks
Starts at Paid

Grafana OnCallGrafana OnCall

On-call management for Grafana

Strengths

  • +Open source on-call
  • +Grafana integration
  • +Good alerting
  • +Self-hostable
  • +PagerDuty alternative

Weaknesses

  • -Newer product
  • -Less features than PagerDuty
  • -Documentation improving
  • -Setup complexity
  • -Enterprise features limited

Key features

On-call managementGrafana integrationSchedulesEscalationsChatOpsOpen source
Starts at $20/user/month

Pricing: Aqueduct vs Grafana OnCall

PlanAqueductGrafana OnCall
Tier 1N/A
Free
Free
Tier 2N/A
$20 /user/month
Pro
Tier 3N/A
from $25K/year
Enterprise

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Aqueduct pricing and Grafana OnCall pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Grafana OnCall has a free tier. Aqueduct is paid only.

Go with: Grafana OnCall

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: Aqueduct

Value user reviews?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: Grafana OnCall

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Aqueduct is paid. Grafana OnCall is freemium. Grafana OnCall lets you start free.

2

What's your use case?

Aqueduct is a AI agents tool. Grafana OnCall is in incident management. Pick the category that matches your needs.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Key Takeaways

Grafana OnCall

  • Free tier available
  • Our pick for this comparison

Aqueduct

  • Better fit for AI agents

The Bottom Line

Grafana OnCall is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Aqueduct or Grafana OnCall better?

Grafana OnCall is rated in our evaluation. Aqueduct is paid and Grafana OnCall is freemium.

What are Aqueduct and Grafana OnCall used for?

Aqueduct: The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution.. Grafana OnCall: On-call management for Grafana.

What does Aqueduct cost vs Grafana OnCall?

Aqueduct is a paid tool. Grafana OnCall is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools