Skip to content

Aqueduct vs PagerDuty: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)

Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Aqueduct and PagerDuty side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.

On the data: On the data below, PagerDuty leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

Data comparison compiled by Toolradar, not hand-reviewed Methodology
Data comparison 1,192 user reviews compared Pricing checked Oct 31, 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:

Aqueduct

The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution.

Best for you if:

  • • You want significantly reduces Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR)

PagerDuty

Orchestrate incident detection, response, and reviews

Best for you if:

  • • You want a free tier before you commit
At a glance: Aqueduct vs PagerDuty
At a Glance
Aqueduct Aqueduct
PagerDuty PagerDuty
Starts at
Not published
Free plan, paid from $21/seat/mo, billed yearly Professional plan
Category
DevOps Incident Management
Incident Management DevOps
Rating
n/a 4.5/5 G2 4.5 · Capterra 4.6 1,192 reviews
Free plan
No Yes

Choose Aqueduct or PagerDuty?

Aqueduct

Choose Aqueduct if

  • You want significantly reduces Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR)
  • You want decreases alert fatigue and burnout for on-call teams
  • You work in DevOps, not incident management
PagerDuty

Choose PagerDuty if

  • You want a free tier before you commit
  • You want industry leader
  • You want many integrations
  • You work in incident management, not DevOps

In-Depth Analysis

Aqueduct Aqueduct

The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution.

Strengths

  • Pro: Significantly reduces Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR)
  • Pro: Decreases alert fatigue and burnout for on-call teams
  • Pro: Prevents repeat incidents by identifying risks and learning from past events
  • Pro: Rapid deployment and day-one value with existing tool integrations
  • Pro: Provides transparent, evidence-backed reasoning, not a black box

Weaknesses

  • Con: Requires integration with existing observability and operational tools
  • Con: Initial trust-building phase may be needed for read-write actions
  • Con: Effectiveness improves over time with continuous learning and feedback

Key features

Correlates alerts, logs, metrics, traces, and tickets Guides through RCA, mitigation, and postmortems Integrates with observability tools, code, ticketing, docs, and chat Provides evidence-backed investigations and prioritized next steps Continuously learns from investigations and user corrections Analyzes incidents, logs, and customer tickets to surface risks

PagerDuty PagerDuty

Orchestrate incident detection, response, and reviews

Fair value

PagerDuty has a free plan, then Professional at $21 per user/month billed annually ($25 monthly).

Strengths

  • Pro: Industry leader
  • Pro: Many integrations
  • Pro: AI features

Weaknesses

  • Con: Expensive
  • Con: Complex for small teams

Key features

Incident management On-call scheduling Escalation policies 700+ integrations Status pages Post-incident reviews

Plans and prices: Aqueduct vs PagerDuty

Plans and prices of Aqueduct and PagerDuty, as read on each vendor's pricing page. Each plan keeps its own billing unit.
Tool Plans and prices Source
Aqueduct No plan prices on file aqueducthq.com
PagerDuty
  • Free: Free
  • Professional: $21/seat/mo, billed yearly
  • PD Reliability Platform Starter: $2,800/year
  • PD Reliability Platform Essential: Custom pricing
  • PD Reliability Platform Plus: Custom pricing
  • Ultimate: Custom pricing
pagerduty.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026

Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Aqueduct pricing and PagerDuty pricing.

Key Takeaways

Aqueduct

  • Choose if you want the AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution

PagerDuty

  • Has a free plan

What the data shows

On the data below, PagerDuty leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.

  • Only PagerDuty has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 1,192 reviews); Aqueduct has none we can show.
  • PagerDuty starts at $21/seat/mo, billed yearly; Aqueduct has no public paid plan price on file.
  • Only PagerDuty has a free plan.

Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate

Frequently Asked Questions

How do Aqueduct and PagerDuty compare in 2026?

On the data below, PagerDuty leads on a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only PagerDuty has a published user rating (4.5/5 from 1,192 reviews); Aqueduct has none we can show. PagerDuty starts at $21/seat/mo, billed yearly; Aqueduct has no public paid plan price on file. Only PagerDuty has a free plan.

What are Aqueduct and PagerDuty used for?

Aqueduct: The AI SRE that integrates with your stack, investigates alerts, and accelerates incident resolution. PagerDuty: Orchestrate incident detection, response, and reviews.

What does Aqueduct cost vs PagerDuty?

Aqueduct has no public paid-plan price on file. PagerDuty's cheapest paid plan is Professional at $21/seat/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.

What's the main difference between Aqueduct and PagerDuty?

Aqueduct's main strength: significantly reduces Mean Time To Resolution (MTTR). PagerDuty's main strength: industry leader.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools