Avoma vs Notta: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Avoma and Notta side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Notta leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Avoma
AI meeting assistant for revenue teams
Best for you if:
- • You want automates note-taking, follow-up emails, and CRM updates, saving over 4 hours per week
Notta
AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Avoma | Notta |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $19/seat/mo, billed yearly Startup plan | Free plan, paid from $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly Pro plan |
Category | Transcription Revenue Intelligence | Transcription Note-Taking |
Rating | 4.6/5 G2 4.6 · Capterra 4.8 1,370 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 229 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Conversation and Revenue Intelligence are paid add-ons | Enterprise starts from 51 seats and needs a custom quote |
Choose Avoma or Notta?
Choose Avoma if
- You want automates note-taking, follow-up emails, and CRM updates, saving over 4 hours per week
- You want increases qualified meetings by 2x through effortless scheduling and instant lead routing
Choose Notta if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
- You want significant time savings on meeting minutes and note-taking
- Budget matters ($8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly vs $19/seat/mo, billed yearly)
In-Depth Analysis
Avoma
AI meeting assistant for revenue teams
Avoma has no free plan but a 14-day trial, and viewers are free.
Watch out
Conversation and Revenue Intelligence are paid add-ons
Strengths
- Pro: Automates note-taking, follow-up emails, and CRM updates, saving over 4 hours per week.
- Pro: Increases qualified meetings by 2x through effortless scheduling and instant lead routing.
- Pro: Reduces ramp time and increases win rates by 40% with automated call scoring and personalized coaching.
- Pro: Boosts quota attainment by 30% with AI-powered deal risk alerts, methodology tracking, and win-loss analysis.
- Pro: Offers real-time transcription in over 75 languages, making conversations searchable and accessible.
Weaknesses
- Con: The product's 'all-in-one' nature might lead to a steep learning curve for new users trying to utilize all features.
- Con: Reliance on AI for critical functions like call scoring and risk alerts may introduce biases or inaccuracies if not properly configured or monitored.
- Con: The extensive automation and integration with CRM systems could raise concerns about data privacy and security for some organizations.
Key features
Notta
AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
Notta has a free plan with 120 transcription minutes a month (3 minutes per conversation).
Watch out
Enterprise starts from 51 seats and needs a custom quote
Strengths
- Pro: High transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
- Pro: Significant time savings on meeting minutes and note-taking
- Pro: Supports a wide range of languages for transcription and translation
- Pro: Seamless collaboration and sharing features
- Pro: Strong data security measures (SOC-2, GDPR compliant)
Weaknesses
- Con: Accuracy may decrease with poor audio quality, accents, or background noise
- Con: Free plan has limited transcription minutes
Key features
Plans and prices: Avoma vs Notta
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Avoma |
| avoma.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| Notta |
| notta.ai/en/pricing read Oct 22, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Avoma pricing and Notta pricing.
Key Takeaways
Avoma
- Choose if you want AI meeting assistant for revenue teams
Notta
- Lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly vs $19/seat/mo, billed yearly
- Has a free plan
What the data shows
On the data below, Notta leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.6/5 from 1,370 reviews for Avoma, 4.4/5 from 229 reviews for Notta).
- Notta has the lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) against $19/seat/mo, billed yearly (Startup) for Avoma.
- Only Notta has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Avoma and Notta compare in 2026?
On the data below, Notta leads on lower entry price and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings are within 0.2 points (4.6/5 from 1,370 reviews for Avoma, 4.4/5 from 229 reviews for Notta). Notta has the lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) against $19/seat/mo, billed yearly (Startup) for Avoma. Only Notta has a free plan.
What are Avoma and Notta used for?
Avoma: AI meeting assistant for revenue teams. Notta: AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
What does Avoma cost vs Notta?
Avoma's cheapest paid plan is Startup at $19/seat/mo, billed yearly. Notta's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Avoma and Notta?
Avoma's main strength: automates note-taking, follow-up emails, and CRM updates, saving over 4 hours per week. Notta's main strength: high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions).