Fireflies.ai vs Notta: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Fireflies.ai and Notta side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Fireflies.ai leads on higher user rating; Notta leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Fireflies.ai
AI meeting transcription and search
Best for you if:
- • You want automatic meeting transcription
Notta
AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
Best for you if:
- • You want high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
| At a Glance | Fireflies.ai | Notta |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $10/seat/mo, billed yearly Pro plan | Free plan, paid from $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly Pro plan |
Category | Transcription Note-Taking | Transcription Note-Taking |
Rating | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 753 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 229 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Storage caps on lower plans | Enterprise starts from 51 seats and needs a custom quote |
Choose Fireflies.ai or Notta?
Choose Fireflies.ai if
- You want automatic meeting transcription
- You want works with Zoom, Meet, Teams
Choose Notta if
- You want high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
- You want significant time savings on meeting minutes and note-taking
- Budget matters ($8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly vs $10/seat/mo, billed yearly)
In-Depth Analysis
Fireflies.ai
AI meeting transcription and search
Fireflies offers good value for meeting transcription.
Watch out
Storage caps on lower plans
Strengths
- Pro: Automatic meeting transcription
- Pro: Works with Zoom, Meet, Teams
- Pro: Searchable meeting archive
- Pro: Action items extraction
- Pro: Good accuracy for clear audio
Weaknesses
- Con: Accuracy drops with accents/noise
- Con: Privacy concerns recording meetings
- Con: Paid plans required for teams
- Con: Storage limits on lower tiers
- Con: Some lag in transcription
Key features
Notta
AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
Notta has a free plan with 120 transcription minutes a month (3 minutes per conversation).
Watch out
Enterprise starts from 51 seats and needs a custom quote
Strengths
- Pro: High transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
- Pro: Significant time savings on meeting minutes and note-taking
- Pro: Supports a wide range of languages for transcription and translation
- Pro: Seamless collaboration and sharing features
- Pro: Strong data security measures (SOC-2, GDPR compliant)
Weaknesses
- Con: Accuracy may decrease with poor audio quality, accents, or background noise
- Con: Free plan has limited transcription minutes
Key features
Plans and prices: Fireflies.ai vs Notta
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fireflies.ai |
| fireflies.ai/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| Notta |
| notta.ai/en/pricing read Oct 22, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Fireflies.ai pricing and Notta pricing.
Key Takeaways
Fireflies.ai
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5
Notta
- Lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly vs $10/seat/mo, billed yearly
What the data shows
On the data below, Fireflies.ai leads on higher user rating; Notta leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Fireflies.ai has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 753 reviews for Fireflies.ai, 4.4/5 from 229 reviews for Notta).
- Notta has the lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) against $10/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) for Fireflies.ai.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Fireflies.ai and Notta compare in 2026?
On the data below, Fireflies.ai leads on higher user rating; Notta leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Fireflies.ai has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 753 reviews for Fireflies.ai, 4.4/5 from 229 reviews for Notta). Notta has the lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) against $10/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) for Fireflies.ai. Both have a free plan.
What are Fireflies.ai and Notta used for?
Fireflies.ai: AI meeting transcription and search. Notta: AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
What does Fireflies.ai cost vs Notta?
Fireflies.ai's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $10/seat/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Notta's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Fireflies.ai and Notta?
Fireflies.ai's main strength: automatic meeting transcription. Notta's main strength: high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions).