Float vs Runn: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Float and Runn side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Runn leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Float
Unlock cash visibility and make confident financial decisions with visual cash flow forecasting.
Best for you if:
- • You want cash flow forecasting
Runn
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
Best for you if:
- • You want provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies
| At a Glance | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $50/mo, billed monthly Early plan | From $7/mo, billed monthly Lite plan |
Category | Finance Analytics | Project Management Task Management |
Rating | n/a | 4.8/5 Capterra 4.8 · G2 4.5 34 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | Revenue-based pricing slider means your actual cost may be much higher than the advertised starting price, a $10M+ revenue business pays several times the base rate even on the Early plan | n/a |
Choose Float or Runn?
Choose Float if
- You want cash flow forecasting
- You want good integration
- You work in finance, not project management
Choose Runn if
- You want provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies
- You want significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods
- Budget matters ($7/mo, billed monthly vs $50/mo, billed monthly)
- You work in project management, not finance
In-Depth Analysis
Float
Unlock cash visibility and make confident financial decisions with visual cash flow forecasting.
Float is a solid cash flow forecasting tool for small businesses using Xero, QuickBooks, or FreeAgent, with pricing that scales by both plan tier and annual revenue.
Watch out
Revenue-based pricing slider means your actual cost may be much higher than the advertised starting price, a $10M+ revenue business pays several times the base rate even on the Early plan
Strengths
- Pro: Cash flow forecasting
- Pro: Good integration
- Pro: Active development
- Pro: Good features
- Pro: Fair pricing
Weaknesses
- Con: Limited features
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Better alternatives exist
- Con: Feature gaps
- Con: Support varies
Key features
Runn
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
Runn's pricing is fair for its comprehensive feature set, especially with the Standard tier at $11 per resource seat/month offering significant value.
Strengths
- Pro: Provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies.
- Pro: Significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods.
- Pro: Helps prevent employee burnout by balancing workloads effectively.
- Pro: Improves profitability and utilization by optimizing resource allocation.
- Pro: Offers clear visibility into future capacity and project pipeline for strategic decision-making.
Weaknesses
- Con: No specific cons were mentioned in the provided text.
Key features
Plans and prices: Float vs Runn
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Float |
| floatapp.com/pricing read Oct 15, 2026 |
| Runn |
| runn.io/pricing read Oct 13, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Float pricing and Runn pricing.
Key Takeaways
Float
- Choose if you want unlock cash visibility and make confident financial decisions with visual cash flow forecasting
Runn
- Lower entry price: $7/mo, billed monthly vs $50/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, Runn leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Runn has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 34 reviews); Float has none we can show.
- Runn has the lower entry price: $7/mo, billed monthly (Lite) against $50/mo, billed monthly (Early) for Float.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Float and Runn compare in 2026?
On the data below, Runn leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Runn has a published user rating (4.8/5 from 34 reviews); Float has none we can show. Runn has the lower entry price: $7/mo, billed monthly (Lite) against $50/mo, billed monthly (Early) for Float.
What are Float and Runn used for?
Float: Unlock cash visibility and make confident financial decisions with visual cash flow forecasting. Runn: Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
What does Float cost vs Runn?
Float's cheapest paid plan is Early at $50/mo, billed monthly. Runn's cheapest paid plan is Lite at $7/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 15, 2026.
What's the main difference between Float and Runn?
Float's main strength: cash flow forecasting. Runn's main strength: provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies.