Float vs Runn: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between Float and Runn comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Bottom line: Float wins this matchup. Our overall Resource Planning pick is Resource Guru. Our free Resource Planning pick is Teamwork. Pick Runn if you need its specific feature set.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:
Float
Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team.
Best for you if:
- • You want increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery
- • You want provides clear visibility into team availability and project profitability
Runn
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
Best for you if:
- • You want provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies
- • You want significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods
| At a Glance | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | $700/moStarter | $7/moLite |
Best For | Resource Planning | Resource Planning |
Rating | 4.4/5 | 4.8/5 |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose Float or Runn?
Choose Float if
Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team.
- You want increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery
- You want provides clear visibility into team availability and project profitability
Choose Runn if
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
- You want provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies
- You want significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods
| Feature | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Paid | Paid |
| User Rating | ★4.4/5 45 reviews | ★4.8/5 34 reviews |
| Categories | Resource PlanningProject Management | Resource PlanningProject Management |
In-Depth Analysis
Float
Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team.
Float's pricing is on the expensive side, especially for smaller teams.
Strengths
- +Increases resourcing efficiency and on-time delivery
- +Provides clear visibility into team availability and project profitability
- +Helps prevent double-booking and overworking team members
- +Flexible for various work arrangements (full-time, part-time, contractors)
- +User-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality
Weaknesses
- -Float's built-in reporting is thin, so teams that need in-depth project budget or financial analysis often end up exporting data to CSV and rebuilding the numbers in a spreadsheet.
- -Float is a pure resource scheduler with no real project or task management, lacking task dependencies and hierarchies, so it usually has to be paired with a separate PM tool for the actual execution work.
- -Because you pay per scheduled person and capabilities like actuals tracking, advanced reporting, SSO, and multi-currency are gated to the $12-per-person Pro tier, costs scale steeply as headcount grows.
- -Larger teams report the schedule becomes cumbersome at scale, citing heavy horizontal scrolling and project managers finding recurring timesheet entry tedious once dozens of people are on it.
Key features
Runn
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
Runn's pricing is fair for its comprehensive feature set, especially with the Standard tier at $11 per resource seat/month offering significant value.
Strengths
- +Provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies.
- +Significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods.
- +Helps prevent employee burnout by balancing workloads effectively.
- +Improves profitability and utilization by optimizing resource allocation.
- +Offers clear visibility into future capacity and project pipeline for strategic decision-making.
Weaknesses
- -No specific cons were mentioned in the provided text.
Key features
Pricing: Float vs Runn
| Plan | Float | Runn |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | $700 USD per scheduled person/month Starter | $7 USD Per resource seat /month Lite |
| Tier 2 | $1200 USD per scheduled person/month Pro | $11 USD Per resource seat /month Standard |
| Tier 3 | Contact us for pricing Enterprise | Contact us Advanced |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Float pricing and Runn pricing.
Who Should Use What?
On a budget?
Both are paid. Compare plans on their websites.
Go with: Float
Want the highest-rated option?
Float: 4.4/5 (45 reviews). Runn: 4.8/5 (34 reviews).
Go with: Runn
Value user reviews?
Float: 45 reviews (4.4/5). Runn: 34 reviews (4.8/5).
Go with: Float
3 Questions to Help You Decide
What's your budget?
Both are paid. Pricing won't help you decide here.
What's your use case?
Both are resource planning tools. Compare their specific features to decide.
How important are ratings?
Runn is rated higher: 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5.
Key Takeaways
Float
- Larger review base (45 reviews)
- Our pick for this comparison
Runn
- Higher user rating: 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5
The Bottom Line
Float wins this matchup. Our overall Resource Planning pick is Resource Guru. Our free Resource Planning pick is Teamwork.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Float or Runn better?
Float is rated in our evaluation. Both are paid.
What are Float and Runn used for?
Float: Optimize resource allocation, plan projects profitably, and gain financial insights for your team.. Runn: Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery..
What does Float cost vs Runn?
Float is a paid tool. Runn is a paid tool. Visit their websites for detailed pricing.