Skip to content

Forestry vs Decap CMS: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Forestry and Decap CMS comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: Decap CMS is our overall pick for headless cms workflows. Pick Forestry if you need a free tier to start with.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked May 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

Forestry

The Forestry.io team is now focused on TinaCMS, a Git-backed headless CMS for developers.

Best for you if:

  • Forestry.io is no longer maintained; the team is building TinaCMS.
  • TinaCMS is a Git-backed headless CMS for modern web development.

Decap CMS

Open-source content management for your Git workflow, designed for static sites and Jamstack projects.

Best for you if:

  • Open-source content management system for Git-based workflows.
  • Integrates with any static site generator for Jamstack projects.
At a Glance
ForestryForestry
Decap CMSDecap CMS
Starts at
Free tier + paid plansFree tier available
Contact us/moPriority Support
Best For
Headless CMSHeadless CMS
Rating
--

Choose Forestry or Decap CMS?

Forestry

Choose Forestry if

The Forestry.io team is now focused on TinaCMS, a Git-backed headless CMS for developers.

  • Leverages Git for content versioning and collaboration
  • Framework-agnostic, offering flexibility for developers
  • Visual editing provides a live preview experience
Decap CMS

Choose Decap CMS if

Open-source content management for your Git workflow, designed for static sites and Jamstack projects.

  • Leverages Git for versioning, history, and collaboration, eliminating the need for a separate database.
  • Enhances performance, security, and scalability for static sites.
  • Highly customizable and extensible for developers.
FeatureForestryDecap CMS
Pricing ModelFreemiumFreemium
User RatingNo ratings yetNo ratings yet
Categories
Headless CMSDeveloper Tools
Headless CMSCMS

In-Depth Analysis

ForestryForestry

The Forestry.io team is now focused on TinaCMS, a Git-backed headless CMS for developers.

Strengths

  • +Leverages Git for content versioning and collaboration
  • +Framework-agnostic, offering flexibility for developers
  • +Visual editing provides a live preview experience
  • +Open-source nature allows for high customizability and extensibility
  • +Supports local development for immediate feedback on content model changes

Weaknesses

  • -Forestry.io is no longer supported, requiring migration to TinaCMS
  • -TinaCMS currently only supports GitHub repositories
  • -TinaCMS does not have a dedicated preview button like Forestry, relying on visual editing for live previews

Key features

Frameworks-agnostic (supports all frameworks and static site generators)Git-sync (commits content changes to your repository)Basic and Visual Editing (live preview of content)Multi-Branch support (create and switch branches from UI)Open-Source and ExtensibleLocal Development (run CMS locally with your site)
Starts at Free tier + paid plans

Decap CMSDecap CMS

Open-source content management for your Git workflow, designed for static sites and Jamstack projects.

Strengths

  • +Leverages Git for versioning, history, and collaboration, eliminating the need for a separate database.
  • +Enhances performance, security, and scalability for static sites.
  • +Highly customizable and extensible for developers.
  • +Provides an intuitive and fast user interface for content editors.
  • +Supports localization and flexible content modeling.

Weaknesses

  • -Requires familiarity with Git and static site generators for optimal setup.
  • -May have a learning curve for non-technical users initially setting up custom content types or advanced features.
  • -Relies on Git providers, which might be a dependency for some users.

Key features

Git-based workflow for content and code managementOpen-source and community-drivenCompatible with any static site generator (e.g., Gatsby, Hugo, Next.js)Easy installation and YAML-based configurationCustomizable with React for custom widgets, previews, and editor componentsSupports multiple file types (Markdown, JSON, YAML, TOML, XML, CSV)
Starts at Contact us/mo

Pricing: Forestry vs Decap CMS

PlanForestryDecap CMS
Tier 1N/A
Free
Free
Tier 2N/A
Contact us
Priority Support
Tier 3N/A
Contact us
Onboarding
Tier 4N/A
Contact us
Custom Features Development
Tier 5N/A
Donate
GitHub Sponsors
Tier 6N/A
Donate
Open Collective

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Forestry pricing and Decap CMS pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: Forestry

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: Forestry

Value user reviews?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Go with: Decap CMS

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

Both are headless cms tools. Compare their specific features to decide.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has user reviews yet.

Key Takeaways

Decap CMS

  • Free tier available
  • Our pick for this comparison

Forestry

  • Choose if you want the Forestry.io team is now focused on TinaCMS, a Git-backed headless CMS for developers

The Bottom Line

Decap CMS is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Forestry or Decap CMS better?

Decap CMS is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.

What are Forestry and Decap CMS used for?

Forestry: The Forestry.io team is now focused on TinaCMS, a Git-backed headless CMS for developers.. Decap CMS: Open-source content management for your Git workflow, designed for static sites and Jamstack projects..

What does Forestry cost vs Decap CMS?

Forestry is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Decap CMS is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools