Greenhouse vs Harver: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Greenhouse and Harver side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Harver leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Greenhouse
Hiring software for growing companies
Best for you if:
- • You want structured hiring
Harver
Make better, faster talent decisions with predictive assessments and automated hiring solutions.
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly reduces time to hire (up to 40%)
| At a Glance | Greenhouse | Harver |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Not published | Not published |
Category | HR & Recruiting ATS | HR & Recruiting Assessment Tools |
Rating | 4.5/5 Capterra 4.5 765 reviews | 4.7/5 G2 4.6 · Capterra 5.0 178 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose Greenhouse or Harver?
Choose Greenhouse if
- You want structured hiring
- You want strong analytics
Choose Harver if
- You want significantly reduces time to hire (up to 40%)
- You want decreases employee turnover by up to 25% within 90 days
In-Depth Analysis
Greenhouse
Hiring software for growing companies
However, the feature progression suggests it's likely on the expensive side for smaller businesses, while offering robust solutions for mid-market and enterprise clients.
Strengths
- Pro: Structured hiring
- Pro: Strong analytics
- Pro: 400+ integrations
Weaknesses
- Con: Complex setup
- Con: Expensive
Key features
Harver
Make better, faster talent decisions with predictive assessments and automated hiring solutions.
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly reduces time to hire (up to 40%)
- Pro: Decreases employee turnover by up to 25% within 90 days
- Pro: Increases application rates (up to 42%)
- Pro: Minimizes bias in the hiring process through automation and validated assessments
- Pro: Provides deep, actionable insights into candidate potential and post-hire performance
Weaknesses
- Con: Specific pricing details are not publicly available, requiring a demo request
- Con: Requires integration with existing HR systems, which may involve setup time
Key features
Plans and prices: Greenhouse vs Harver
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Greenhouse |
| greenhouse.io/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| Harver | No plan prices on file | harver.com |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Greenhouse pricing and Harver pricing.
Key Takeaways
Greenhouse
- Choose if you want hiring software for growing companies
Harver
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.5/5
What the data shows
On the data below, Harver leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Harver has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 765 reviews for Greenhouse, 4.7/5 from 178 reviews for Harver).
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Greenhouse and Harver compare in 2026?
On the data below, Harver leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Harver has the higher user rating (4.5/5 from 765 reviews for Greenhouse, 4.7/5 from 178 reviews for Harver).
What are Greenhouse and Harver used for?
Greenhouse: Hiring software for growing companies. Harver: Make better, faster talent decisions with predictive assessments and automated hiring solutions.
What does Greenhouse cost vs Harver?
Greenhouse has no public paid-plan price on file. Harver has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Greenhouse and Harver?
Greenhouse's main strength: structured hiring. Harver's main strength: significantly reduces time to hire (up to 40%).