Groundcover vs New Relic: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Groundcover and New Relic side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Groundcover leads on higher user rating; New Relic leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Groundcover
Monitor cloud and on-prem environments with full data, lower costs, and complete control.
Best for you if:
- • You want significantly lower total cost of ownership due to BYOC architecture and host-based pricing
New Relic
Full-stack observability with 50+ monitoring capabilities
Best for you if:
- • You want generous free tier
| At a Glance | Groundcover | New Relic |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $30/host/mo, billed monthly Pro plan | Free plan, paid from $10/mo Standard plan |
Category | Monitoring DevOps | Monitoring DevOps |
Rating | 4.8/5 G2 4.8 26 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 783 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Data ingest overages at $0.40/GB (Standard) |
Choose Groundcover or New Relic?
Choose Groundcover if
- You want significantly lower total cost of ownership due to BYOC architecture and host-based pricing
- You want full data fidelity with no sampling or rate limiting
Choose New Relic if
- You want generous free tier
- You want full-stack observability
- Budget matters ($10/mo vs $30/host/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
Groundcover
Monitor cloud and on-prem environments with full data, lower costs, and complete control.
Groundcover's pricing is competitive, especially for smaller teams with the Free tier offering 12-hour data retention.
Strengths
- Pro: Significantly lower total cost of ownership due to BYOC architecture and host-based pricing.
- Pro: Full data fidelity with no sampling or rate limiting.
- Pro: Enhanced data privacy, security, and residency by keeping data within user's VPC.
- Pro: Zero instrumentation and easy deployment with eBPF.
- Pro: Comprehensive visibility across infrastructure, applications, and LLMs.
Weaknesses
- Con: Requires managing infrastructure within your own VPC for the observability solution.
- Con: May have a learning curve for users unfamiliar with BYOC or eBPF concepts.
Key features
New Relic
Full-stack observability with 50+ monitoring capabilities
New Relic's freemium model is generous, offering 100 GB/month and a full platform user for free.
Watch out
Data ingest overages at $0.40/GB (Standard)
Strengths
- Pro: Generous free tier
- Pro: Full-stack observability
- Pro: AI insights
Weaknesses
- Con: Complex to set up
- Con: Data can be expensive
Key features
Plans and prices: Groundcover vs New Relic
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Groundcover |
| groundcover.com/pricing read Nov 2, 2026 |
| New Relic |
| newrelic.com/pricing read Oct 25, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Groundcover pricing and New Relic pricing.
Key Takeaways
Groundcover
- Higher user rating: 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5
New Relic
- Lower entry price: $10/mo vs $30/host/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, Groundcover leads on higher user rating; New Relic leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Groundcover has the higher user rating (4.8/5 from 26 reviews for Groundcover, 4.4/5 from 783 reviews for New Relic).
- New Relic has the lower entry price: $10/mo (Standard) against $30/host/mo, billed monthly (Pro) for Groundcover.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Groundcover and New Relic compare in 2026?
On the data below, Groundcover leads on higher user rating; New Relic leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Groundcover has the higher user rating (4.8/5 from 26 reviews for Groundcover, 4.4/5 from 783 reviews for New Relic). New Relic has the lower entry price: $10/mo (Standard) against $30/host/mo, billed monthly (Pro) for Groundcover. Both have a free plan.
What are Groundcover and New Relic used for?
Groundcover: Monitor cloud and on-prem environments with full data, lower costs, and complete control. New Relic: Full-stack observability with 50+ monitoring capabilities.
What does Groundcover cost vs New Relic?
Groundcover's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $30/host/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. New Relic's cheapest paid plan is Standard at $10/mo; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Groundcover and New Relic?
Groundcover's main strength: significantly lower total cost of ownership due to BYOC architecture and host-based pricing. New Relic's main strength: generous free tier.