Lalabase vs Teamwork: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Lalabase and Teamwork side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Lalabase
Manage client projects with tickets, docs, time tracking, notes, and cited AI
Best for you if:
- • Software companies managing customer projects, tickets, documentation, and billable time
Teamwork
Project and resource management software for busy teams, integrating client management and automated forms.
Best for you if:
- • You want good project management
| At a Glance | Lalabase | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $103.68/year Cloud (annual billing) plan | Free plan, paid from $8.99/user/mo, billed monthly Starter plan |
Category | Project Management Time Tracking | Project Management Task Management |
Rating | 5.0/5 1 review | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 · SourceForge 4.3 1,281 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Free tier limited to 5 users, 2 projects. |
Choose Lalabase or Teamwork?
Choose Lalabase if
- Software companies managing customer projects, tickets, documentation, and billable time
- You want all-in-one solution for client projects that replaces several tools
- You want open source and free to self-host, no vendor lock-in
Choose Teamwork if
- You want good project management
- You want client portal
In-Depth Analysis
Lalabase
Manage client projects with tickets, docs, time tracking, notes, and cited AI
Lalabase's pricing is generous, especially the free self-hosting tier under AGPL-3.0.
Strengths
- Pro: All-in-one solution for client projects that replaces several tools
- Pro: Open source and free to self-host, no vendor lock-in
- Pro: Strict data protection: GDPR-compliant EU hosting, AI off by default
- Pro: Direct line to the founder, personal support
- Pro: Quick to get started, no long onboarding
Weaknesses
- Con: Has a small community
- Con: No mobile app mentioned, but responsive
Key features
Teamwork
Project and resource management software for busy teams, integrating client management and automated forms.
Teamwork's pricing is fair, offering a generous free tier and competitive per-user pricing.
Watch out
Free tier limited to 5 users, 2 projects.
Strengths
- Pro: Good project management
- Pro: Client portal
- Pro: Time tracking
- Pro: Fair pricing
- Pro: Good for agencies
Weaknesses
- Con: UI dated
- Con: Less modern than competitors
- Con: Mobile apps basic
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Limited free tier
Key features
Plans and prices: Lalabase vs Teamwork
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Lalabase |
| lalabase.com/en/pricing read Oct 24, 2026 |
| Teamwork |
| teamwork.com/pricing read Oct 18, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Lalabase pricing and Teamwork pricing.
Key Takeaways
Lalabase
- Choose if you want manage client projects with tickets, docs, time tracking, notes, and cited AI
Teamwork
- Choose if you want project and resource management software for busy teams, integrating client management and automated forms
What the data shows
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (5.0/5 from 1 reviews for Lalabase, 4.4/5 from 1,281 reviews for Teamwork; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Lalabase $103.68/year; Teamwork $8.99/user/mo, billed monthly.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
What Users Say
Lalabase Reviews
Good for multi-customer agency
One software for multiple customers with multiple projects, with ticketing and time-tracking. Exactly what I needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Lalabase and Teamwork compare in 2026?
On the data below the two are close or not directly comparable, so we do not name a winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (5.0/5 from 1 reviews for Lalabase, 4.4/5 from 1,281 reviews for Teamwork; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Lalabase $103.68/year; Teamwork $8.99/user/mo, billed monthly. Both have a free plan.
What are Lalabase and Teamwork used for?
Lalabase: Manage client projects with tickets, docs, time tracking, notes, and cited AI. Teamwork: Project and resource management software for busy teams, integrating client management and automated forms.
What does Lalabase cost vs Teamwork?
Lalabase's cheapest paid plan is Cloud (annual billing) at $103.68/year; it also has a free plan. Teamwork's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $8.99/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 24, 2026.
What's the main difference between Lalabase and Teamwork?
Lalabase's main strength: all-in-one solution for client projects that replaces several tools. Teamwork's main strength: good project management.