Skip to content

mkcert vs Hanko: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between mkcert and Hanko comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: mkcert is our overall pick for developer tools workflows. Pick Hanko if you need security.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked Jun 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

mkcert

Create local trusted dev certificates

Best for you if:

  • • You need something completely free
  • • You need developer tools features specifically
  • mkcert is a tool for creating locally-trusted development certificates
  • It generates TLS certificates for localhost without complex setup

Hanko

Open-source authentication with passkeys

Best for you if:

  • • You need security features specifically
  • Hanko is an open-source authentication solution with passkey support
  • It provides passwordless login using WebAuthn with drop-in authentication UI
At a Glance
mkcertmkcert
HankoHanko
Starts at
FreeFree tier available
FreeFree tier available
Best For
Developer ToolsSecurity
Rating
--

Choose mkcert or Hanko?

mkcert

Choose mkcert if

Create local trusted dev certificates

  • Local SSL certificates
  • Easy to use
  • No configuration
  • You want a fully free tool (Hanko requires payment)
  • Your work is developer tools-shaped, not security-shaped
Hanko

Choose Hanko if

Open-source authentication with passkeys

  • Passwordless auth
  • Open source
  • Self-hostable
  • Your work is security-shaped, not developer tools-shaped
FeaturemkcertHanko
Pricing ModelFreeFreemium
User RatingNo ratings yetNo ratings yet
Categories
Developer ToolsSecurity
SecurityIdentity & Access

In-Depth Analysis

mkcertmkcert

Create local trusted dev certificates

Strengths

  • +Local SSL certificates
  • +Easy to use
  • +No configuration
  • +Cross-platform
  • +Good for dev

Weaknesses

  • -Dev only
  • -Security considerations
  • -Limited features
  • -Manual renewal
  • -Niche tool

Key features

Local certificatesDevelopmentTrusted locallySimpleCross-platformOpen source
Starts at Free

HankoHanko

Open-source authentication with passkeys

Strengths

  • +Passwordless auth
  • +Open source
  • +Self-hostable
  • +Passkey support
  • +Good documentation

Weaknesses

  • -Newer platform
  • -Limited features
  • -Community smaller
  • -Enterprise features paid
  • -Integration effort

Key features

Passkey authenticationPasswordlessWebAuthnSelf-hostedCloud optionOpen source
Starts at Free

Pricing: mkcert vs Hanko

PlanmkcertHanko
Tier 1N/A
Free
Starter
Tier 2N/A
$29
Pro
Tier 3N/A
Custom
Enterprise

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on mkcert pricing and Hanko pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

mkcert is free. Hanko is freemium.

Go with: mkcert

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call on ratings — compare on features and pricing.

Value user reviews?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call — neither has ratings yet.

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

mkcert is free. Hanko is freemium. Go with mkcert if free matters most.

2

What's your use case?

mkcert is a developer tools tool. Hanko is in security. Pick the category that matches your needs.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has ratings yet.

Key Takeaways

mkcert

  • Completely free
  • Our pick for this comparison

Hanko

  • Better fit for security

The Bottom Line

mkcert is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is mkcert or Hanko better?

mkcert is rated in our evaluation. mkcert is free and Hanko is freemium.

What are mkcert and Hanko used for?

mkcert: Create local trusted dev certificates. Hanko: Open-source authentication with passkeys.

What does mkcert cost vs Hanko?

mkcert is completely free. Hanko is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools