n8n vs ProcessMaker: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for n8n and ProcessMaker side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, n8n leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
n8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
ProcessMaker
Automate and optimize business workflows with AI-powered intelligence and end-to-end process orchestration.
Best for you if:
- • You want easy to navigate UI for functional users to create and alter workflows
| At a Glance | n8n | |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from €20/mo, billed yearly Starter plan | Not published |
Category | Automation Workflow Automation | Workflow Automation Low-Code Backend |
Rating | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 · SourceForge 5.0 305 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.3 · Capterra 4.5 479 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | Cloud execution limits: Starter 2,500/mo, Pro 10,000/mo, Business 40,000/mo -- workflows pause when you hit the limit (no overage on Starter/Pro) | Overage fees for cases beyond 1,000/month |
Choose n8n or ProcessMaker?
Choose n8n if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want open source
- You want self-hostable
- You work in automation, not workflow automation
Choose ProcessMaker if
- You want easy to navigate UI for functional users to create and alter workflows
- You want excellent customer support and engagement
- You work in workflow automation, not automation
In-Depth Analysis
n8n
Workflow automation for technical teams
n8n is the most cost-effective option if you self-host (unlimited workflows for $0) or run moderate cloud volumes.
Watch out
Cloud execution limits: Starter 2,500/mo, Pro 10,000/mo, Business 40,000/mo -- workflows pause when you hit the limit (no overage on Starter/Pro)
Strengths
- Pro: Open source
- Pro: Self-hostable
- Pro: Code flexibility
Weaknesses
- Con: More technical
- Con: Fewer native integrations
Key features
ProcessMaker
Automate and optimize business workflows with AI-powered intelligence and end-to-end process orchestration.
ProcessMaker's pricing is on the expensive side, with the Standard plan starting at a significant $3,000 per month.
Watch out
Overage fees for cases beyond 1,000/month
Strengths
- Pro: Easy to navigate UI for functional users to create and alter workflows
- Pro: Excellent customer support and engagement
- Pro: Powerful scripting capabilities for limitless customization
- Pro: Ability to quickly stand up simple processes in hours or days
- Pro: Scalable solutions for complex enterprise operations
Weaknesses
- Con: Building anything beyond simple workflows leans heavily on technical skill, with reviewers noting that moderately complex processes often require PHP scripting and that advanced reporting demands knowledge of the backend database.
- Con: The interface is frequently described as dated and unintuitive, and the platform's breadth of features gives it a steep learning curve that can overwhelm non-technical users without meaningful training.
- Con: Pricing is not published and requires a sales quote, and its per-user plus case-based model is repeatedly called expensive for larger teams, where costs can climb into thousands of dollars per month.
- Con: Users report performance and scalability issues on very large or highly complex workflows, including bugs that slow execution as deployments grow.
Key features
Plans and prices: n8n vs ProcessMaker
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| n8n |
| n8n.io/pricing read Oct 19, 2026 |
| ProcessMaker |
| processmaker.com/pricing read Sep 30, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on n8n pricing and ProcessMaker pricing.
Key Takeaways
n8n
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5
- Has a free plan
ProcessMaker
- Choose if you want automate and optimize business workflows with AI-powered intelligence and end-to-end process orchestration
What the data shows
On the data below, n8n leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- n8n has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 305 reviews for n8n, 4.4/5 from 479 reviews for ProcessMaker).
- n8n starts at €20/mo, billed yearly; ProcessMaker has no public paid plan price on file.
- Only n8n has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do n8n and ProcessMaker compare in 2026?
On the data below, n8n leads on higher user rating and a free plan. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. n8n has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 305 reviews for n8n, 4.4/5 from 479 reviews for ProcessMaker). n8n starts at €20/mo, billed yearly; ProcessMaker has no public paid plan price on file. Only n8n has a free plan.
What are n8n and ProcessMaker used for?
n8n: Workflow automation for technical teams. ProcessMaker: Automate and optimize business workflows with AI-powered intelligence and end-to-end process orchestration.
What does n8n cost vs ProcessMaker?
n8n's cheapest paid plan is Starter at €20/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. ProcessMaker has no public paid-plan price on file. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 19, 2026.
What's the main difference between n8n and ProcessMaker?
n8n's main strength: open source. ProcessMaker's main strength: easy to navigate UI for functional users to create and alter workflows.