Skip to content

Prompt Security vs Noma Security: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Prompt Security and Noma Security comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: Prompt Security is our overall pick for security workflows. Pick Noma Security if you need its specific feature set.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked Jun 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

Prompt Security

Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats

Best for you if:

  • Secures generative AI applications and usage across the enterprise.
  • Prevents shadow AI, data leaks, prompt injection, and other AI-specific risks.

Noma Security

Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

Best for you if:

  • Discovers and maps all AI assets, including models, agents, and data sources.
  • Protects AI systems from novel threats like prompt injection and data leakage in real-time.
At a Glance
Prompt SecurityPrompt Security
Noma SecurityNoma Security
Starts at
Custom
Custom
Best For
SecuritySecurity
Rating
--

Choose Prompt Security or Noma Security?

Prompt Security

Choose Prompt Security if

Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats

  • Provides a holistic approach to AI security, covering employees, homegrown apps, and code assistants.
  • Offers robust protection against a wide range of AI-specific threats, including those identified by OWASP.
  • Features flexible deployment and LLM-agnostic integration for broad compatibility.
Noma Security

Choose Noma Security if

Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

  • Provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors.
  • Offers deep visibility into the entire AI landscape, including dependencies and connections, which traditional tools miss.
  • Enables real-time protection and policy enforcement at runtime, preventing threats and ensuring compliance.
FeaturePrompt SecurityNoma Security
Pricing ModelPaidPaid
User RatingNo ratings yetNo ratings yet
Categories
SecurityAI Assistants
SecurityAI Assistants

In-Depth Analysis

Prompt SecurityPrompt Security

Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats

Strengths

  • +Provides a holistic approach to AI security, covering employees, homegrown apps, and code assistants.
  • +Offers robust protection against a wide range of AI-specific threats, including those identified by OWASP.
  • +Features flexible deployment and LLM-agnostic integration for broad compatibility.
  • +Includes AI Red Teaming and a Prompt Fuzzer to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.

Weaknesses

  • -Requires integration into existing AI and tech stacks, which may involve initial setup effort.
  • -The comprehensive nature of the platform might be more than what smaller organizations with limited AI adoption require.

Key features

Shadow AI preventionData privacy enforcement and anonymizationPrompt injection protectionJailbreak preventionDenial of Wallet/Service protectionContent moderation for LLM responses
Starts at Custom

Noma SecurityNoma Security

Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

Strengths

  • +Provides comprehensive security specifically designed for AI and autonomous agents, addressing unique attack vectors.
  • +Offers deep visibility into the entire AI landscape, including dependencies and connections, which traditional tools miss.
  • +Enables real-time protection and policy enforcement at runtime, preventing threats and ensuring compliance.
  • +Integrates seamlessly into existing security and development workflows, minimizing disruption.

Weaknesses

  • -Requires integration into complex AI development and deployment environments.
  • -The effectiveness of threat detection relies on continuous updates to keep pace with evolving AI attack techniques.

Key features

Continuous AI landscape discovery and dependency mappingReal-time AI threat protection (prompt injection, jailbreaks, data leakage)AI supply chain risk identification and remediationAutomated AI red teaming and continuous testingAI agent runtime protection and policy enforcementContextual insights into AI models, agents, and data access
Starts at Custom

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are paid. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: Prompt Security

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call on ratings — compare on features and pricing.

Value user reviews?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call — neither has ratings yet.

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are paid. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

Both are security tools. Compare their specific features to decide.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has ratings yet.

Key Takeaways

Prompt Security

  • Our pick for this comparison

Noma Security

  • Choose if you want secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime

The Bottom Line

Prompt Security is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Prompt Security or Noma Security better?

Prompt Security is rated in our evaluation. Both are paid.

What are Prompt Security and Noma Security used for?

Prompt Security: Secure your generative AI, from shadow AI to LLM threats. Noma Security: Secure AI systems and agents from discovery to runtime.

What does Prompt Security cost vs Noma Security?

Prompt Security is a paid tool. Noma Security is a paid tool. Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools