qsa.sh vs Corgea: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between qsa.sh and Corgea comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Bottom line: qsa.sh wins this matchup. Our overall Vulnerability Scanning pick is Malwarebytes. Our free Vulnerability Scanning pick is Intruder. Pick Corgea if you need a free tier to start with.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:
qsa.sh
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
Best for you if:
- • You want zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy
- • You want transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box
Corgea
AI-powered appsec that finds real risk and fixes flaws
Best for you if:
- • You want 2x more true positives and 3x less false positives compared to traditional scanners
- • You want detects business logic flaws that syntax-only SAST tools miss
| At a Glance | qsa.sh | Corgea |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | FreeFree tier available | FreeFree tier available |
Best For | Security | Security |
Rating | - | - |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Choose qsa.sh or Corgea?
Choose qsa.sh if
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
- You want zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy
- You want transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box
Choose Corgea if
AI-powered appsec that finds real risk and fixes flaws
- You want 2x more true positives and 3x less false positives compared to traditional scanners
- You want detects business logic flaws that syntax-only SAST tools miss
| Feature | qsa.sh | Corgea |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| User Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Categories | SecurityTerminal Tools | SecurityAI Agents |
In-Depth Analysis
qsa.sh
External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal
The pricing is generous for casual use with a free tier that covers the top 1,000 ports, but the $5/mo Full Pro tier is a steal for continuous scanning of all ports, while $7/scan for Deep is steep for occasional use.
Strengths
- +Zero installation, just run curl; no agent or software to deploy.
- +Transparent and auditable, uses only public open-source tools, no black box.
- +Strictly limited to scanning your own IP, with consent gate and opt-out for operators.
Weaknesses
- -IPv4 only, IPv6 connections are refused.
- -Free scan limited to one per 24 hours and only top 1,000 ports; Full and Deep require payment.
Key features
Corgea
AI-powered appsec that finds real risk and fixes flaws
At $39/dev/month for Growth and $49/dev/month for Scale, Corgea's pricing is competitive for an AI-native AppSec tool, especially given the breadth of scanning and fix capabilities included in the free tier.
Watch out
Enterprise pricing likely requires minimum seats
Strengths
- +2x more true positives and 3x less false positives compared to traditional scanners
- +Detects business logic flaws that syntax-only SAST tools miss
- +Seamless integration into developer workflows via SCM, IDE, and agent platforms
Weaknesses
- -AI pentesting is a separate paid product beyond the free SAST tier
- -Relies on AI-generated fixes which require developer review for safety and correctness
Key features
Pricing: qsa.sh vs Corgea
| Plan | qsa.sh | Corgea |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | $0/mo or Free Free | Free Free |
| Tier 2 | $5/mo Full Pro | $39 / dev per month Growth |
| Tier 3 | $7/scan Deep | $49 / dev per month Scale |
| Tier 4 | N/A | Contact us Enterprise |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on qsa.sh pricing and Corgea pricing.
Who Should Use What?
On a budget?
Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.
Go with: qsa.sh
Want the highest-rated option?
Neither has ratings yet.
Too early to call on ratings — compare on features and pricing.
Value user reviews?
Neither has ratings yet.
Too early to call — neither has ratings yet.
3 Questions to Help You Decide
What's your budget?
Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.
What's your use case?
Both are security tools. Compare their specific features to decide.
How important are ratings?
Neither has ratings yet.
Key Takeaways
qsa.sh
- Free tier available
- Our pick for this comparison
Corgea
- Choose if you want aI-powered appsec that finds real risk and fixes flaws
The Bottom Line
qsa.sh wins this matchup. Our overall Vulnerability Scanning pick is Malwarebytes. Our free Vulnerability Scanning pick is Intruder.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is qsa.sh or Corgea better?
qsa.sh is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.
What are qsa.sh and Corgea used for?
qsa.sh: External port and vulnerability scans from your terminal. Corgea: AI-powered appsec that finds real risk and fixes flaws.
What does qsa.sh cost vs Corgea?
qsa.sh is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Corgea is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.