Loom vs Soapbox: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Loom and Soapbox side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Loom leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Loom
Record screen and camera for async video messages
Best for you if:
- • You want faster than writing long emails
Soapbox
Capture high-quality videos and screen recordings directly from your browser, with built-in editing and AI tools.
Best for you if:
- • You want easy to use directly from a web browser, no software download required
| At a Glance | Loom | Soapbox |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $15/user/mo, billed monthly Business plan | Free plan, paid from $79/mo, billed yearly Pro plan |
Category | Screen Recording Communication | Screen Recording Video Editing |
Rating | 4.7/5 G2 4.7 · Capterra 4.7 2,944 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 1,165 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | n/a | Bandwidth overages not explicitly detailed |
Choose Loom or Soapbox?
Choose Loom if
- You want faster than writing long emails
- You want AI transcriptions in 50+ languages
Choose Soapbox if
- You want easy to use directly from a web browser, no software download required
- You want comprehensive suite of recording and editing tools in one platform
In-Depth Analysis
Loom
Record screen and camera for async video messages
Loom's pricing is generally fair, offering a generous free tier for basic use.
Strengths
- Pro: Faster than writing long emails
- Pro: AI transcriptions in 50+ languages
- Pro: Easy screen and camera recording
Weaknesses
- Con: Video quality limited on free tier
- Con: Storage limits for free users
Key features
Soapbox
Capture high-quality videos and screen recordings directly from your browser, with built-in editing and AI tools.
Soapbox's pricing is on the expensive side for individual users, with the Pro tier starting at $79/month billed annually.
Watch out
Bandwidth overages not explicitly detailed
Strengths
- Pro: Easy to use directly from a web browser, no software download required.
- Pro: Comprehensive suite of recording and editing tools in one platform.
- Pro: AI features like script generation and social clip creation save time.
- Pro: Seamless integration with Wistia's robust video marketing platform.
- Pro: Group recording feature enables collaborative content creation.
Weaknesses
- Con: Group Recording is currently in beta, which might imply some instability or limited features.
- Con: Full benefits are realized when integrated with the broader Wistia ecosystem, which may have additional costs.
Key features
Plans and prices: Loom vs Soapbox
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Loom |
| loom.com/pricingread Oct 14, 2026 |
| Soapbox |
| wistia.com/pricingread Oct 11, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Loom pricing and Soapbox pricing.
Key Takeaways
Loom
- Higher user rating: 4.7/5 vs 4.4/5
Soapbox
- Choose if you want capture high-quality videos and screen recordings directly from your browser, with built-in editing and AI tools
What the data shows
On the data below, Loom leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Loom has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 2,944 reviews for Loom, 4.4/5 from 1,165 reviews for Soapbox).
- Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Loom $15/user/mo, billed monthly; Soapbox $79/mo, billed yearly.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Loom and Soapbox compare in 2026?
On the data below, Loom leads on higher user rating. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Loom has the higher user rating (4.7/5 from 2,944 reviews for Loom, 4.4/5 from 1,165 reviews for Soapbox). Entry prices are not ranked, they are charged on different bases: Loom $15/user/mo, billed monthly; Soapbox $79/mo, billed yearly. Both have a free plan.
What are Loom and Soapbox used for?
Loom: Record screen and camera for async video messages. Soapbox: Capture high-quality videos and screen recordings directly from your browser, with built-in editing and AI tools.
What does Loom cost vs Soapbox?
Loom's cheapest paid plan is Business at $15/user/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Soapbox's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $79/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 14, 2026.
What's the main difference between Loom and Soapbox?
Loom's main strength: faster than writing long emails. Soapbox's main strength: easy to use directly from a web browser, no software download required.