Short answer: Credo AI when the gap is a system of record for agents, models, and vendors. It publishes no list price. Fiddler is the trust layer with a public meter, at $0.002 per trace on Developer. Arthur Premium is $60/mo after a free plan, until the enterprise contract. HiddenLayer is the security layer, and it publishes no usable list price because its marketplace unit is undefined. Holistic AI, ValidMind, and Monitaur are quote-only.
Match the contract to the layer you are actually missing.
A TRiSM buy fails when one logo is asked to be the policy record, the production monitor, and the runtime block. Trust, risk, and security are three purchases that sometimes share a vendor and often do not. Credo AI is the record to start from when legal and risk need evidence, and you can accept a quote.
Toolradar data: of the 754 security tools in the catalog, 48% offer a free or freemium plan, while 380 (50%) are paid-only.
That mix is why a free scanner will not fund this program. Most of the platforms below are paid-only contracts, and several print no dollar at all. The two self-serve exceptions are the trace meter and the monthly plan in the table. A questionnaire pack with no runtime belongs in AI governance tools. A cloud bill of materials for models you already host belongs in AI security posture. Prompt-injection testing on one named app belongs in LLM security.
Start with Credo AI when the missing artifact is the registry and the policy evidence. Move to Fiddler AI when you need a published price for guardrails and traces. Use Arthur when a small team can live inside the free caps and will read the marketplace personal-data clause before signing. Use HiddenLayer when the gap is supply-chain scans, attack simulation, and inline blocking, and you will define the unit before you treat the sticker as a team price.
How we ranked: these ten were chosen from the 754 security tools in the catalog because each one sells at least one TRiSM layer a buyer can procure on its own. Prices were checked on vendor sites and on AWS Marketplace listings those vendors sell, in September 2026.
Top Picks
Picked by editorial review, informed by G2 and Capterra review volume and rating and by media mentions, the signals behind our category rankings. How we rate
The governance record for agents, models, and vendors, with named policy packs and no public price.
Starting price
No list price
Best for
Risk teams building the system of record
Discovery, a large test library, and Guardian Agents on one governance platform, still quote-only.
Starting price
No list price
Best for
Teams that want inventory and live intervention
Guardrails on a free tier and observability on a published per-trace price, with Enterprise still a quote.
Starting price
From $0.002 /trace
Best for
Teams that need a trace price this quarter
| Tool | Starting price | Rating | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Credo AI | No list price | n/a | Risk teams building the system of record |
| Holistic AI | No list price | n/a | Teams that want inventory and live intervention |
| Fiddler AI | From $0.002/trace | n/a | Teams that need a trace price this quarter |
| Arthur | From $0/mo | n/a | Teams that can start inside the free caps |
| HiddenLayer | No usable list price | n/a | Security teams securing models and agents |
| Lasso Security | From $20,000/yr | n/a | Teams buying a gateway or chatbot guardrail |
| Mindgard | No list price | n/a | Teams whose gap is an AI attack test |
| ValidMind | No list price | n/a | Model-risk teams in banks and insurers |
| Monitaur | No list price | n/a | Regulated teams standardizing model controls |
| Portal26 | $250,000/yr | n/a | Security teams governing staff chatbot use |
Credo AI
The governance record for agents, models, and vendors, with named policy packs and no public price.
- Starting price
- No list price
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Risk teams building the system of record
- Pro: Policy packs on the product page cover the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OMB M-25, and CO ADMT.
- Pro: The registry includes agents, applications, models, and vendors, with shadow AI detection, risk classification, and dependency mapping.
- Pro: Named connections include Snowflake, Databricks, AWS, Azure, ServiceNow, Jira, Confluence, Slack, GitHub, and MLflow, and the site claims 300+ integrations. GAIA, the governance assistant, is described as generally available.
- Con: Credo AI publishes no list price, so the first number you can budget is the quote.
- Con: Continuous monitoring is described as a connection to observability tools you already run, so a prompt block is a second contract.
Holistic AI
Discovery, a large test library, and Guardian Agents on one governance platform, still quote-only.
- Starting price
- No list price
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Teams that want inventory and live intervention
- Pro: Discovery covers models, agents, LLM apps, APIs, and pipelines, with AWS, Azure, GitHub, and Databricks named, and the site says 20+ integrations.
- Pro: More than 40 tests cover bias, hallucinations, toxicity, and privacy, and red teaming covers prompt injection, jailbreaks, and adversarial attacks.
- Pro: Guardian Agents split observe and act: Sentinel Agents score each tool call, and Operative Agents can block, redirect, stop, or escalate, mapped to the EU AI Act and ISO 42001.
- Con: Holistic AI publishes no list price, including for the test suite and the Guardian Agents.
- Con: Controls also name NYC Local Law 144, NIST AI RMF, and ISO/IEC 42001, but the runtime action still has to be proven on your agent framework during the pilot.
Fiddler AI
Guardrails on a free tier and observability on a published per-trace price, with Enterprise still a quote.
- 4.4 on G2 (4 reviews)
- Starting price
- From $0.002/trace
- Free plan
- Yes
Best for: Teams that need a trace price this quarter
- Pro: Free lists real-time guardrails for hallucinations, toxicity, PII/PHI, prompt injection, and jailbreaks, with stated latency under 80 ms, using Fiddler Centor models.
- Pro: Developer adds observability for agentic and predictive systems, tests and experiments, custom evaluators, a bring-your-own judge, RBAC, and SSO, on SaaS.
- Pro: Enterprise adds VPC or on-prem deployment, a named customer success manager, and customized onboarding.
- Con: The paid plan is per trace and the pricing page publishes no monthly cap and no definition of what one trace contains.
- Con: VPC or on-prem, the deployment regulated teams usually need, sits on Enterprise, which publishes no list price.
The pricing for Fiddler AI is generally fair, with a generous free tier for basic guardrails.
- Starting price
- From $0/mo
- Free plan
- Yes
Best for: Teams that can start inside the free caps
- Pro: Free is multi-tenant SaaS with data drift, tracing, continuous evals, and custom evals, capped at 4 use cases, 2 projects, 7-day retention, 5k jobs, 300k spans, 12k inferences, 3k evals, and 3 custom alerts per model.
- Pro: Premium raises the caps to 100 use cases, 10 projects, 30-day retention, 20k jobs, 1.2M spans, 100k inferences, and 75k evals, and adds webhooks plus customizable dashboards.
- Pro: The product site describes discovery of agents on endpoints, in cloud, and on-prem, including shadow agents, with runtime alerts for prompt injection and anomalous tool use.
- Con: Explainability methods, what-if analysis, global explanations, SSO, single-tenant SaaS, a self-managed VPC, the uptime SLA, and the dedicated success manager are Enterprise only.
- Con: The AWS listing starts at $19,000 for 12 months, says overage is not billed automatically, and states Arthur is not intended for processing personal data.
Arthur AI's pricing structure is quite generous, especially with its feature-rich Free tier.
Watch out
Professional Services are an add-on
HiddenLayer
Discovery, artifact scans, MITRE ATLAS tests, and runtime blocking, sold as one undefined marketplace unit.
- Starting price
- No usable list price
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Security teams securing models and agents
- Pro: Four modules share one inventory: AI Discovery, AI Supply Chain Security, AI Attack Simulation, and AI Runtime Security.
- Pro: Attack simulation includes System Prompt Evaluation and Red Team Evaluation, aligned to MITRE ATLAS, without requiring model weights or training data.
- Pro: Agent Harness Security names Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot. AWS coverage names Bedrock models and agents, SageMaker endpoints, and Bedrock AgentCore with the Strands framework.
- Con: The only public price is one marketplace unit for 12 months, and the listing does not say what that unit counts.
- Con: Fees are non-refundable except as required by law, and vendor support on the listing is email, Monday to Friday.
Lasso Security
Runtime inspection with two public AWS contracts, plus a broader platform that those contracts do not itemize.
- Starting price
- From $20,000/yr
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Teams buying a gateway or chatbot guardrail
- Pro: The product site describes an inventory of agents and apps, posture checks aligned to NIST and OWASP, red teaming, and inline enforcement at a proxy, API, or gateway.
- Pro: Lasso states an attack library of more than 3,000 types, detection accuracy of 98.6%, and classification under 50 ms.
- Pro: AWS lists a GenAI chatbot commitment at $20,000 for 12 months and a secured gateway commitment at $50,000 for 12 months, with prompt-injection and data-leak controls described on the gateway listing.
- Con: Additional gateway usage is $0.01 per unit, and the listing does not define the unit. The chatbot dimension also does not say how many chatbots sit in one unit.
- Con: Discovery, posture, and the red-team library are described on the website, while the two marketplace prices are narrower, so the full platform can still be a private offer.
Mindgard
Automated reconnaissance and red teaming for agents and models, with runtime defense and no public price.
- Starting price
- No list price
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Teams whose gap is an AI attack test
- Pro: The platform is grouped as Discover, Recon, Attack, and Defend, including an AI bill of materials, shadow AI exposure, and infrastructure crawling.
- Pro: Mindgard says its library is fed by 150+ publicly disclosed AI vulnerabilities, and it names prior findings against production systems including Grok and ChatGPT.
- Pro: The pricing page names deployment through CI/CD or Burp Suite, and Defend includes runtime protection plus agent hardening.
- Con: Mindgard publishes no list price on its pricing page.
- Con: The product is offensive testing and runtime defense. Approval files for SR 26-2 or OSFI E-23 are a different system.
ValidMind
Model-risk documentation and agent governance for banks and insurers, priced only by quote.
- Starting price
- No list price
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Model-risk teams in banks and insurers
- Pro: Four modules: AI Governance, AI and Model Risk Management, Validation Automation, and Development Automation.
- Pro: The product page names audit-ready evidence for SR 26-2, the EU AI Act, SS1/23, and OSFI E-23.
- Pro: Agent governance is described as policy-as-code, real-time hooks, and audit trails of reasoning traces, tool-call logs, and policy evaluations, on top of test, document, validate, govern, and monitor steps.
- Con: ValidMind publishes no list price. The pricing page says the quote depends on model count, governance complexity, and deployment.
- Con: It is a model-risk system of record. It does not publish a trace meter or a marketplace runtime hour.
Monitaur
A 33-control library and automated evidence for model, GenAI, and agent governance, with no public price.
- Starting price
- No list price
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Regulated teams standardizing model controls
- Pro: The Common Controls library has 33 controls for high-risk models, meant to be reused across regulations instead of rebuilt for each one.
- Pro: FlightSim runs synthetic tests before deployment and returns letter grades. Automate Record checks drift and bias in production and logs decisions against safe ranges.
- Pro: Monitaur says Automate evidences 40% of required governance inside those Common Controls, mapped to NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, and the EU AI Act. Vendor governance covers third-party GenAI and agents.
- Con: Monitaur publishes no list price.
- Con: The 40% claim is a share of Monitaur's own control library, so it does not tell you how much of an exam file is still manual.
Portal26
Employee GenAI discovery and policy enforcement, with a large marketplace platform fee and an undefined overage unit.
- Starting price
- $250,000/yr
- Free plan
- No
Best for: Security teams governing staff chatbot use
- Pro: The listing covers shadow AI discovery, use-case and intent discovery, prompt risk, audit records, and policy enforcement, and it can instruct an existing secure web gateway or firewall.
- Pro: AI data is stored encrypted in a NIST FIPS certified vault where the customer holds the keys. Agentic token control, prompt protection, and license intelligence are named as further modules.
- Pro: AWS Marketplace lists a free trial. The paid platform dimension is a 12-month contract, separate from additional usage.
- Con: Additional usage is $1 per unit, and neither the platform unit nor the extra unit is defined, so the renewal math is still a conversation.
- Con: The free trial has no published length or cap. This product watches GenAI usage. It does not validate a credit or claims model.
What an AI TRiSM tool is
AI TRiSM software is the stack that keeps an AI system trustworthy, inside policy, and harder to abuse. If a product only writes a policy PDF, or only filters one prompt, it is one layer of that stack.
The record is the registry, the risk tier, and the evidence an auditor can export. Credo AI and Holistic AI sell that job, and ValidMind and Monitaur sell it in the shape a bank or insurer already uses for model risk. The trust layer is drift, evals, fairness, and an explanation of a bad output. Fiddler and Arthur sell that, with very different caps. The security layer is the scan of the model file, the red team, and the block on a live request. HiddenLayer, Lasso, and Mindgard sell pieces of it. The usage layer is which employees opened which chatbot and whether a prompt carried sensitive data. Portal26 sells that, and it will not validate a credit model.
A buyer who needs all four layers should expect two or three contracts. Holistic AI is the widest governance suite here, because discovery, more than 40 tests, and Guardian Agents sit on one platform, and it still publishes no list price. Pairing it with a trace meter or a runtime gateway is normal, not a failed shortlist. Model training pipelines that are not about trust or abuse sit in MLOps tools.
Why the sticker and the layer come apart
The expensive mistake is comparing a per-trace meter with a 12-month platform unit and calling the smaller number the winner. Fiddler's Developer plan is a trace price with no monthly ceiling on the pricing page, so a busy agent can pass a seat budget without a new tier. Arthur's Premium plan is a flat month until you hit 100 use cases, 30 days of retention, or a need for SSO, and then the self-serve page stops.
Arthur's AWS listing is a different object from that monthly plan. It shows a starting 12-month contract, repeats the same dollar as an overage cell, and then says growth past the contract is not billed automatically. The same listing says Arthur is not for processing personal data. A trust tool you cannot point at customer prompts is a pilot, not the production control, unless a private agreement lifts that sentence.
HiddenLayer's marketplace row is full platform access for 12 months, measured in units, and the listing says it does not map a unit to a model, an agent, or an estate. Lasso prints two contracts, one for GenAI chatbots and one for a secured gateway, plus an extra usage fee whose unit is also unnamed. Portal26 prints a platform dimension and a $1 additional-usage unit that is likewise unnamed. Credo AI, Holistic AI, Mindgard, ValidMind, and Monitaur publish no list price, so they cannot win a spreadsheet until the quote names the module.
Treat "includes governance" on a security product as a claim to test, not a line item you already bought. HiddenLayer generates an AI bill of materials and aligns attack tests to MITRE ATLAS. That is security evidence. It is not Credo AI's policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OMB M-25, and CO ADMT. The wider catalog of tools in this category is security.
Key Features to Look For
A registry with an owner (Essential)
Credo AI, Holistic AI, ValidMind, and Monitaur keep agents, models, and vendors in one inventory with a risk tier and an owner. A runtime filter does not know what nobody registered.
A named policy pack (Essential)
Credo AI lists packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OMB M-25, and CO ADMT. Holistic AI adds NYC Local Law 144. ValidMind names SR 26-2, SS1/23, and OSFI E-23. A generic checklist is not a pack.
A production limit you can count (Essential)
Arthur Free stops at 4 use cases, 7 days, 300k spans, and 3k evals. Premium moves those caps. Fiddler Developer bills per trace with no published monthly cap. If you cannot count the unit, you cannot forecast the renewal.
A test before the model ships (Essential)
Holistic AI lists more than 40 tests, including bias, hallucinations, toxicity, and privacy. Mindgard, Lasso, and HiddenLayer run adversarial tests. Monitaur FlightSim returns letter grades before go-live.
A block on a live request (Important)
Fiddler Free lists guardrails under 80 ms. Lasso states classification under 50 ms. HiddenLayer can detect, redact, or block, including inside coding agents. A dashboard that alerts tomorrow is a different product.
An explanation, not only an alert (Important)
Arthur puts explainability methods, what-if analysis, and global explanations on Enterprise only. Fiddler Developer adds custom evaluators and a bring-your-own judge. If the appeal is 'why did it deny this person,' confirm the tier includes the explanation.
A place prompts are allowed to sit (Important)
Arthur's marketplace listing forbids personal data. Portal26 stores AI data in a NIST FIPS certified vault and says the customer holds the keys. Residency and that personal-data sentence belong in the order, not the demo.
Employee chatbot coverage, named (Nice to have)
Portal26 discovers unsanctioned GenAI tools and can instruct an existing secure web gateway or firewall. Lasso's chatbot contract is a separate AWS dimension from the gateway. Buy this when the risk is staff usage, not a model in SageMaker.
What to settle before the demo
-
Write down the missing layer in one sentence: registry, evals, runtime block, model-risk file, or employee chatbot use. Credo AI and Holistic AI start at the registry. Fiddler and Arthur start at traces and evals. HiddenLayer, Lasso, and Mindgard start at attacks. Portal26 starts at staff usage.
-
Ask which contract the demo maps to. Arthur's monthly plan and Arthur's AWS contract are not the same document, and the AWS text bars personal data. Lasso's chatbot dimension and Lasso's gateway dimension are not the website's full platform.
-
Count the billing unit in your own estate before you rank stickers. A trace, a use case, an undefined marketplace unit, and a quote per model are not the same object.
-
Separate evidence from enforcement. Monitaur's 40% figure is a share of its own Common Controls, not a share of the EU AI Act. Credo AI describes production monitoring as a connection to tools you already run.
Evaluation Checklist
On Credo AI, list the packs you will turn on (EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OMB M-25, CO ADMT) and ask which alerts require a separate observability tool.
On Holistic AI, run one agent through discovery, one of the 40+ tests, and a Guardian Agent action (block, redirect, or escalate) and ask for the order that includes all three.
On Fiddler, send a prompt-injection case through Free and confirm the stated latency is under 80 ms, then estimate monthly traces before you leave Developer.
On Arthur, compare Free (4 use cases, 2 projects, 7-day retention, 3 custom alerts per model) with Premium (100 use cases, 10 projects, 30 days, webhooks) and read the AWS personal-data notice before procurement uses that listing.
On HiddenLayer, get a written definition of one marketplace unit, and confirm whether Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Bedrock, and SageMaker are inside that unit.
On Lasso, decide whether you are buying the chatbot dimension, the gateway dimension, or a private offer for discovery and red teaming, and ask what the extra usage fee counts.
On Portal26, ask what one platform unit and one additional-usage unit include, whether the free trial has a time limit, and whether your secure web gateway is on the supported list.
Pricing Overview
Self-serve meter or month
Fiddler Developer, and Arthur Free and Premium.
Per trace, or a flat month
Marketplace platform unit
HiddenLayer, Lasso's two listings, Portal26, and Arthur's AWS floor.
A 12-month contract dimension
Quote only
Credo AI, Holistic AI, Mindgard, ValidMind, and Monitaur.
No public dollar
Pricing Comparison
| Tool | Free or trial | Public paid entry | Above that | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
None published | No list price | No list price | Registry and policy packs | |
None published | No list price | No list price | Discovery, tests, Guardian Agents | |
Guardrails, no trace price | $0.002 per trace | Enterprise quote (VPC or on-prem) | Guardrails plus observability | |
Arthur | $0/mo, 4 use cases | $60/mo Premium | AWS from $19,000 / 12 mo | Agent inventory and evals |
None published | No usable list price (unit undefined) | Private offer | Scan, red team, runtime | |
Lasso | None published | $20,000 / 12 mo chatbots | $50,000 / 12 mo gateway | Runtime inspection |
Mindgard | None published | No list price | No list price | Red team and runtime defense |
None published | No list price | No list price | Bank and insurer model risk | |
Monitaur | None published | No list price | No list price | Control library and evidence |
Trial, length unpublished | $250,000 / 12 mo | $1 per extra unit | Employee GenAI usage |
Prices checked on vendor pages and AWS Marketplace listings sold by those vendors, September 24, 2026. Arthur's $60/mo plan is the self-serve price on arthur.ai. Marketplace units for HiddenLayer, Lasso, and Portal26 do not define what one unit counts. Credo AI, Holistic AI, Mindgard, ValidMind, and Monitaur publish no list price.
Mistakes to Avoid
- ×
Buying Credo AI as if it were the runtime block. The packs and the registry are the product. Monitoring is described as a hook into observability you already have, so the prompt filter is still unbought.
- ×
Treating Holistic AI's three steps as one line item you have not seen priced. Identify, protect, and enforce are separate promises on a quote-only platform. Ask which of discovery, the 40+ tests, and Operative Agents are in the order.
- ×
Forecasting Fiddler from headcount. Developer is a trace price with no monthly cap on the page. A weekly demo and a production agent do not cost the same.
- ×
Signing Arthur's AWS contract for a workload full of customer text. The listing bars personal data, and it is not the same document as the self-serve month. Explainability is on Enterprise, not on Free or Premium.
- ×
Dividing HiddenLayer's unit by the number of models. The listing sells full platform access for 12 months and declines to define the unit. Lasso's chatbot price and gateway price have the same problem, one tier down.
- ×
Expert Tips
- →
Name the layer in the RFP title. 'TRiSM platform' attracts every vendor on this page. 'Registry and EU AI Act evidence' attracts Credo AI and Holistic AI. 'Trace price and guardrails' attracts Fiddler. If Credo is close but not quite, see Credo AI alternatives.
- →
Price Arthur twice. Put the self-serve caps in one column and the AWS floor in another, and attach the personal-data sentence to the AWS column only. Teams comparing monitors can start from Fiddler AI alternatives.
- →
Ask HiddenLayer for the unit in writing before legal reviews the $ sticker. The same question belongs on Lasso's extra usage fee and Portal26's additional unit. Cloud accounts that are the real risk belong in AI cloud security.
- →
Use Mindgard or Lasso's attack library as a test, then file the result in the record. A red-team pass with nowhere to store the evidence does not help the next audit. The record side is the governance guide linked above.
- →
For a bank, start the shortlist at ValidMind and Monitaur even though both are quotes. SR 26-2, SS1/23, and a 33-control library are closer to an exam than a per-trace developer plan. Arthur's shape for that buyer is Arthur alternatives only after the personal-data clause is resolved.
- →
Do not average these into one monthly tool cost. A trace, a flat month, a 12-month unit, and a quote answer different questions. The category index is security.
Red Flags to Watch For
-
A Credo AI or Holistic AI order that prices 'the platform' and never names the policy packs, the test suite, or the Guardian Agents.
-
An Arthur AWS order used for customer prompts after the listing has said the product is not for personal data.
-
A Fiddler estimate that multiplies a headcount by the trace price and never estimates traces.
-
A HiddenLayer, Lasso, or Portal26 order that treats one marketplace dimension as a per-model or per-employee fee when the listing does not say that.
-
A Monitaur proposal that treats 40% of Common Controls as 40% of your regulator's evidence list.
-
A Mindgard or Lasso red-team subscription described as the system of record for model approval.
The Bottom Line
Credo AI when the board question is which agents exist and which policy pack applies, and you will take a quote. Skip it when the ticket in front of you is a live prompt injection on an app you already named.
Holistic AI when you want discovery, a large test set, and a Guardian Agent that can block, on one quote. Skip it when you need a number before the call.
Fiddler when you want guardrails this month and will estimate traces before Developer becomes the bill. Arthur when the free caps cover the pilot and you will not send personal data through the AWS listing. Skip Arthur Premium if you need SSO, a VPC, or global explanations, because those sit on Enterprise.
HiddenLayer when security wants scans, MITRE ATLAS tests, and a runtime block, and someone will define the unit first. Lasso when the purchase is a chatbot commitment or a gateway commitment, not a guess that both are included. Mindgard when the missing work is the attack itself and a quote is acceptable.
ValidMind or Monitaur when the reader of the file is a model-risk team, not a developer counting spans. Portal26 when the risky system is the chatbot employees already opened, and the platform dimension is in budget.
Cite this: Toolradar, "Best AI TRiSM Tools in 2026", September 2026. Prices checked on vendor pages and AWS Marketplace listings in September 2026. Compared with the 754 security tools in the catalog.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best AI TRiSM tool in 2026?
Credo AI, if the missing piece is a system of record for agents, models, and vendors, with policy packs for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OMB M-25, and CO ADMT. It publishes no list price. Choose Holistic AI if you also want more than 40 tests and Guardian Agents that can block, also on a quote. Choose Fiddler if you need a published Developer meter and can start on free guardrails. Choose Arthur if a free plan with 4 use cases is enough for the pilot. Choose HiddenLayer if the gap is model security rather than the policy file.
How much does AI TRiSM software cost in 2026?
As of September 24, 2026, Fiddler Developer is $0.002 per trace and Arthur Premium is $60/mo, with Free at $0/mo for 4 use cases. Arthur's AWS listing starts at $19,000 for 12 months and bars personal data. HiddenLayer lists $5,000,000 per unit for 12 months and does not define the unit. Lasso lists $20,000 for 12 months on GenAI chatbots and $50,000 for 12 months on the secured gateway, plus $0.01 per additional gateway unit. Portal26 lists $250,000 for 12 months, plus $1 per additional unit. Credo AI, Holistic AI, Mindgard, ValidMind, and Monitaur publish no list price.
Is there a free AI TRiSM tool in 2026?
Arthur Free is $0/mo and includes drift, tracing, and evals up to 4 use cases, 2 projects, 7 days of retention, 300k spans, and 3k evals. SSO, a VPC, and explainability are not on that plan. Fiddler Free lists guardrails for hallucinations, toxicity, PII/PHI, prompt injection, and jailbreaks at under 80 ms, and the trace price starts on Developer. Portal26 lists a free trial with no published length. Credo AI, Holistic AI, HiddenLayer, Lasso, Mindgard, ValidMind, and Monitaur do not publish a free production plan.
What is AI TRiSM?
AI TRiSM is the set of controls that keep an AI system trustworthy, inside policy, and defended against abuse. In practice that is a registry and policy evidence, production monitoring and explanations, security tests and runtime blocks, and sometimes a view of employee chatbot use. No single product on this list publishes a price for all four. A governance-only shortlist is a different page, and a cloud inventory of models is a different page again.
How does Credo AI compare with Holistic AI?
Both publish no list price, and both aim at the governance record. Credo AI's concrete offer is the policy packs (EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO 42001, OMB M-25, CO ADMT), an agent and vendor registry, and GAIA. Holistic AI's concrete offer is discovery across cloud and code, more than 40 tests, and Guardian Agents that can block or redirect, with NYC Local Law 144 on the control map. Credo AI points monitoring at tools you already run. Holistic AI sells the intervention itself. Neither replaces a trace meter or a marketplace security unit.
Is HiddenLayer the same purchase as a governance system of record?
No. HiddenLayer's four modules are discovery, supply-chain scans, attack simulation aligned to MITRE ATLAS, and runtime enforcement, including coding agents and Bedrock or SageMaker coverage. That produces security evidence. It does not publish Credo AI's policy packs or ValidMind's SR 26-2 documentation workflow. The public price is one 12-month marketplace unit that the listing does not define, so you still need a written unit before you compare it with a per-trace plan. If the asset list is a cloud account rather than an attack test, use the posture guide instead.
Which AI TRiSM tool fits a bank or insurer?
ValidMind, if the file has to speak SR 26-2, SS1/23, or OSFI E-23, and you can accept a quote based on model count. Monitaur, if you want a library of 33 controls, FlightSim letter grades, and drift and bias logging, with the 40% evidence claim limited to Monitaur's own Common Controls. Arthur can monitor a pilot on the free plan, but its AWS listing says not to process personal data, which is a poor fit for customer-level model inputs unless a different contract removes that line. Fiddler's VPC option is on the Enterprise quote, not on the trace price.
Cite this page: Toolradar, "Best AI TRiSM Tools in 2026", updated September 2026, https://toolradar.com/guides/best-ai-trism-tools
Sources
Prices and plan details on this page come from each vendor's own pricing page, re-checked by the Toolradar pricing tracker:
Spotted an outdated price or a wrong fact? Suggest a correction: we check it against the vendor's own page. Work for one of these vendors? Claim your listing to update it yourself.
Related Guides
Some offers on this page may be paid placements or contain affiliate links.