Scalable real-time audio and video infrastructure for developers
Visit WebsiteFreemiumVisit Website
Tracked since2025
0 reviews trackedThe Bottom Line
Entry price
Free plan available, paid tiers above
Biggest pro
Open source WebRTC
Biggest con
Learning curve
TL;DR - Livekit
- LiveKit is an open-source WebRTC platform for real-time video and audio
- It provides infrastructure for building video conferencing and streaming apps
- Free self-hosted option, Cloud pricing based on usage
Pricing: Free plan available
Best for: Growing teams
What is Livekit?
LiveKit provides real-time audio and video infrastructure. WebRTC, rooms, and scaling-the backend for applications with live communication.
The quality is good. The scaling is handled. The integration is straightforward.
Developers building video features choose LiveKit for real-time communication infrastructure.
Available on: Web
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Open source WebRTC
- Good performance
- Self-hostable
- Good documentation
- Active development
Cons
- Learning curve
- Setup complexity
- Cloud pricing
- Resource intensive
- Enterprise features paid
Key Features
WebRTC platformVideo conferencingReal-time audioOpen sourceScalableLow latency
Pricing Plans
Free TrialPricing checked Jul 6, 2026
Build
Free
1K agent min
- 5 concurrent
- 1 deployment
- Community support
Most Popular
Ship
$50/month
5K agent min
- 20 concurrent
- 2 deployments
- Email support
Scale
$500/month
50K agent min
- 1K concurrent
- HIPAA
- Metrics APIs
Enterprise
Custom
Unlimited
- SSO
- SLA
- Dedicated support
Reviews
$99Free with your review
Write a reviewReview Livekit, get a free AI guide
Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.
Best Livekit Alternatives
Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.
Still deciding?
Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.
Explore More
Livekit FAQ
How does LiveKit support real-time communication in applications?
LiveKit provides scalable real-time audio and video infrastructure for developers. It handles WebRTC, manages communication rooms, and scales the backend for applications requiring live communication features.
Which teams would benefit most from using LiveKit?
LiveKit is best suited for developers and engineering teams who are building applications that require robust real-time audio and video communication. Its open-source nature and self-hostable option appeal to teams needing control over their infrastructure.
How is LiveKit's pricing structured?
LiveKit offers a free tier for initial use, with paid plans available for increased usage and access to more advanced features. The pricing model is cloud-based, which developers should consider for their operational costs.
Can LiveKit be self-hosted, or is it only a cloud service?
Yes, LiveKit is self-hostable, providing developers with the flexibility to deploy and manage their real-time communication infrastructure on their own servers. This is a key strength compared to purely cloud-based alternatives.
What kind of trade-offs should developers consider when adopting LiveKit?
Developers should be aware of LiveKit's learning curve and potential setup complexity due to its powerful capabilities. While it offers a free tier, enterprise features are part of paid plans, and it can be resource-intensive.
How does LiveKit compare to a competitor like Twilio for real-time communication?
LiveKit provides open-source WebRTC infrastructure that is self-hostable, offering developers more control over their deployment. In contrast, Twilio typically provides a more managed service for real-time communication, which may suit different operational preferences.
Source: livekit.io