ApplicantStack vs Workable: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for ApplicantStack and Workable side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, ApplicantStack leads on higher user rating and lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
ApplicantStack
Find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software.
Best for you if:
- • You want comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding
Workable
Recruiting software for hiring teams
Best for you if:
- • You want good all-in-one recruiting
| At a Glance | ||
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $29.99/mo, billed monthly Starter plan | From $299/mo, billed monthly Standard plan |
Category | HR & Recruiting ATS | HR & Recruiting ATS |
Rating | 4.4/5 Capterra 4.4 · G2 4.4 · TrustRadius 4.6 2,373 reviews | 4.1/5 G2 4.4 · Capterra 4.4 · Trustpilot 3.4 1,497 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | Additional admin/hiring manager seats cost extra on higher tiers. | n/a |
Choose ApplicantStack or Workable?
Choose ApplicantStack if
- You want comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding
- You want highly customizable workflows to fit specific hiring processes
- Budget matters ($29.99/mo, billed monthly vs $299/mo, billed monthly)
Choose Workable if
- You want good all-in-one recruiting
- You want AI sourcing features
In-Depth Analysis
ApplicantStack
Find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software.
ApplicantStack offers a fair pricing structure, especially for smaller businesses with limited hiring needs.
Watch out
Additional admin/hiring manager seats cost extra on higher tiers.
Strengths
- Pro: Comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding
- Pro: Highly customizable workflows to fit specific hiring processes
- Pro: Integrated text messaging for improved candidate communication and engagement
- Pro: User-friendly interface, making it easy to adopt
- Pro: Strong customer support with HR experience
Weaknesses
- Con: Specific details on advanced analytics capabilities are not explicitly detailed
- Con: No mention of direct integrations with payroll systems or other HRIS beyond its own onboarding module
- Con: The extent of customization for the employee portal is not fully specified
Key features
Workable
Recruiting software for hiring teams
Workable's pricing, starting at $299/month for Standard and $599/month for Premier (for 1-20 employees), is on the higher side compared to some market alternatives, especially for smaller teams.
Strengths
- Pro: Good all-in-one recruiting
- Pro: AI sourcing features
- Pro: Transparent pricing
- Pro: Easy to use
- Pro: Good for SMBs
Weaknesses
- Con: Less powerful than some enterprise ATS
- Con: Limited customization
- Con: Some features basic
- Con: Reporting limited
- Con: Analytics less deep
Key features
Plans and prices: ApplicantStack vs Workable
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ApplicantStack |
| applicantstack.com/pricing read Oct 30, 2026 |
| Workable |
| workable.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on ApplicantStack pricing and Workable pricing.
Key Takeaways
ApplicantStack
- Higher user rating: 4.4/5 vs 4.1/5
- Lower entry price: $29.99/mo, billed monthly vs $299/mo, billed monthly
Workable
- Choose if you want recruiting software for hiring teams
What the data shows
On the data below, ApplicantStack leads on higher user rating and lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- ApplicantStack has the higher user rating (4.4/5 from 2,373 reviews for ApplicantStack, 4.1/5 from 1,497 reviews for Workable).
- ApplicantStack has the lower entry price: $29.99/mo, billed monthly (Starter) against $299/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Workable.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do ApplicantStack and Workable compare in 2026?
On the data below, ApplicantStack leads on higher user rating and lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. ApplicantStack has the higher user rating (4.4/5 from 2,373 reviews for ApplicantStack, 4.1/5 from 1,497 reviews for Workable). ApplicantStack has the lower entry price: $29.99/mo, billed monthly (Starter) against $299/mo, billed monthly (Standard) for Workable.
What are ApplicantStack and Workable used for?
ApplicantStack: Find, hire, and onboard new employees with a simple, fast, and powerful HR software. Workable: Recruiting software for hiring teams.
What does ApplicantStack cost vs Workable?
ApplicantStack's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $29.99/mo, billed monthly. Workable's cheapest paid plan is Standard at $299/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between ApplicantStack and Workable?
ApplicantStack's main strength: comprehensive solution covering both recruiting and onboarding. Workable's main strength: good all-in-one recruiting.