Fathom vs Notta: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Fathom and Notta side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Fathom leads on higher user rating; Notta leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Fathom
AI notetaker that summarizes your meetings so you can focus on the conversation.
Best for you if:
- • You want meeting transcription
Notta
AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
Best for you if:
- • You want high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
| At a Glance | Fathom | Notta |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $15/user/mo, billed yearly Team plan | Free plan, paid from $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly Pro plan |
Category | Transcription AI Assistants | Transcription Note-Taking |
Rating | 4.9/5 G2 5.0 · Trustpilot 4.8 7,187 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 229 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | Yes |
Watch out for | Team and Business require at least 2 users | Enterprise starts from 51 seats and needs a custom quote |
Choose Fathom or Notta?
Choose Fathom if
- You want meeting transcription
- You want AI summaries
Choose Notta if
- You want high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
- You want significant time savings on meeting minutes and note-taking
- Budget matters ($8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly vs $15/user/mo, billed yearly)
In-Depth Analysis
Fathom
AI notetaker that summarizes your meetings so you can focus on the conversation.
Fathom's free plan is generous, with unlimited recordings and transcription.
Watch out
Team and Business require at least 2 users
Strengths
- Pro: Meeting transcription
- Pro: AI summaries
- Pro: Free tier generous
- Pro: Privacy focused
- Pro: Good accuracy
Weaknesses
- Con: Limited integrations
- Con: Newer platform
- Con: Enterprise features limited
- Con: Storage limits
- Con: Competition from others
Key features
Notta
AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
Notta has a free plan with 120 transcription minutes a month (3 minutes per conversation).
Watch out
Enterprise starts from 51 seats and needs a custom quote
Strengths
- Pro: High transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions)
- Pro: Significant time savings on meeting minutes and note-taking
- Pro: Supports a wide range of languages for transcription and translation
- Pro: Seamless collaboration and sharing features
- Pro: Strong data security measures (SOC-2, GDPR compliant)
Weaknesses
- Con: Accuracy may decrease with poor audio quality, accents, or background noise
- Con: Free plan has limited transcription minutes
Key features
Plans and prices: Fathom vs Notta
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Fathom |
| fathom.ai/pricing read Nov 2, 2026 |
| Notta |
| notta.ai/en/pricing read Oct 22, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Fathom pricing and Notta pricing.
Key Takeaways
Fathom
- Higher user rating: 4.9/5 vs 4.4/5
Notta
- Lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly vs $15/user/mo, billed yearly
What the data shows
On the data below, Fathom leads on higher user rating; Notta leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Fathom has the higher user rating (4.9/5 from 7,187 reviews for Fathom, 4.4/5 from 229 reviews for Notta).
- Notta has the lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) against $15/user/mo, billed yearly (Team) for Fathom.
- Both have a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
What Users Say
Fathom Reviews
Value for money
Great for meeting. As a secretary you only need this as one tool that can change your reporting style and timing minute.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Fathom and Notta compare in 2026?
On the data below, Fathom leads on higher user rating; Notta leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Fathom has the higher user rating (4.9/5 from 7,187 reviews for Fathom, 4.4/5 from 229 reviews for Notta). Notta has the lower entry price: $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly (Pro) against $15/user/mo, billed yearly (Team) for Fathom. Both have a free plan.
What are Fathom and Notta used for?
Fathom: AI notetaker that summarizes your meetings so you can focus on the conversation. Notta: AI-powered notetaker for transcribing, summarizing, and translating meetings and audio in real-time.
What does Fathom cost vs Notta?
Fathom's cheapest paid plan is Team at $15/user/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Notta's cheapest paid plan is Pro at $8.17/seat/mo, billed yearly; it also has a free plan. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Nov 2, 2026.
What's the main difference between Fathom and Notta?
Fathom's main strength: meeting transcription. Notta's main strength: high transcription accuracy (up to 98.86% under optimal conditions).