Hubstaff vs ManicTime: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Hubstaff and ManicTime side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, ManicTime leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Hubstaff
Time tracking and workforce management
Best for you if:
- • You want provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights
ManicTime
Automatic time tracking software for individuals and teams to accurately monitor computer usage.
Best for you if:
- • You want automates time tracking, reducing manual effort
| At a Glance | Hubstaff | ManicTime |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $10/seat/mo, billed monthly Team plan | From $7/user/mo, billed monthly Standard plan plan |
Category | Time Tracking Productivity | Time Tracking Productivity |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 3,920 reviews | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 14 reviews |
Free plan | No | No |
Watch out for | n/a | Self-hosted server costs not included. |
Choose Hubstaff or ManicTime?
Choose Hubstaff if
- You want provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights
- You want automates team operations including timesheets, payroll, time-off requests, reporting, and invoicing
Choose ManicTime if
- You want automates time tracking, reducing manual effort
- You want provides detailed insights into work activities and potential time waste
- Budget matters ($7/user/mo, billed monthly vs $10/seat/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
Hubstaff
Time tracking and workforce management
Hubstaff's pricing is fair, offering a generous Free tier for single users.
Strengths
- Pro: Provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights.
- Pro: Automates team operations including timesheets, payroll, time-off requests, reporting, and invoicing.
- Pro: Offers advanced reporting with over 20 customizable reports for monitoring team performance and project progress.
- Pro: Features real-time alerts for projects nearing budget limits, enabling effective cost control.
- Pro: Integrates with over 35 high-end tools like Salesforce, Jira, Slack, Deel, and PayPal.
Weaknesses
- Con: The productivity monitoring features, such as screenshots and activity levels, may raise privacy concerns for some employees.
- Con: While it offers customization for monitoring, the presence of such features could still be perceived as intrusive by some teams.
- Con: The emphasis on mouse and keyboard activity for productivity tracking might not accurately reflect productivity in all roles or tasks.
Key features
ManicTime
Automatic time tracking software for individuals and teams to accurately monitor computer usage.
The Standard plan at $7/month offers fair value for individual users needing cross-platform time tracking and cloud backup.
Watch out
Self-hosted server costs not included.
Strengths
- Pro: Automates time tracking, reducing manual effort
- Pro: Provides detailed insights into work activities and potential time waste
- Pro: Helps accurately bill clients and manage project costs
- Pro: Offers flexible deployment options (Cloud and On-premise)
- Pro: Intuitive interface and easy tagging system
Weaknesses
- Con: No free tier, only a 30-day free trial
- Con: Screenshots in the cloud are only available in the Ultimate plan
- Con: Direct database integration is only available for the on-premise version
Key features
Plans and prices: Hubstaff vs ManicTime
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hubstaff |
| hubstaff.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| ManicTime |
| manictime.com/pricing read Oct 22, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Hubstaff pricing and ManicTime pricing.
Key Takeaways
Hubstaff
- Choose if you want time tracking and workforce management
ManicTime
- Lower entry price: $7/user/mo, billed monthly vs $10/seat/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, ManicTime leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.4/5 from 3,920 reviews for Hubstaff, 4.4/5 from 14 reviews for ManicTime; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides).
- ManicTime has the lower entry price: $7/user/mo, billed monthly (Standard plan) against $10/seat/mo, billed monthly (Team) for Hubstaff.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Hubstaff and ManicTime compare in 2026?
On the data below, ManicTime leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. User ratings rest on too few reviews to rank (4.4/5 from 3,920 reviews for Hubstaff, 4.4/5 from 14 reviews for ManicTime; we compare ratings only above 20 reviews on both sides). ManicTime has the lower entry price: $7/user/mo, billed monthly (Standard plan) against $10/seat/mo, billed monthly (Team) for Hubstaff.
What are Hubstaff and ManicTime used for?
Hubstaff: Time tracking and workforce management. ManicTime: Automatic time tracking software for individuals and teams to accurately monitor computer usage.
What does Hubstaff cost vs ManicTime?
Hubstaff's cheapest paid plan is Team at $10/seat/mo, billed monthly. ManicTime's cheapest paid plan is Standard plan at $7/user/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Hubstaff and ManicTime?
Hubstaff's main strength: provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights. ManicTime's main strength: automates time tracking, reducing manual effort.