Hubstaff vs TimoDesk: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Hubstaff and TimoDesk side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, TimoDesk leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Hubstaff
Time tracking and workforce management
Best for you if:
- • You want provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights
TimoDesk
Track project time, review activity, and manage timesheets for $1 per user
Best for you if:
- • Remote teams, agencies and staffing firms that need screenshot proof of work at a low per-user price
| At a Glance | Hubstaff | TimoDesk |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | From $10/seat/mo, billed monthly Team plan | From $1/user/mo, billed monthly TimoDesk plan |
Category | Time Tracking Productivity | Time Tracking |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 3,920 reviews | n/a |
Free plan | No | No |
Choose Hubstaff or TimoDesk?
Choose Hubstaff if
- You want provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights
- You want automates team operations including timesheets, payroll, time-off requests, reporting, and invoicing
Choose TimoDesk if
- Remote teams, agencies and staffing firms that need screenshot proof of work at a low per-user price
- You want track project time, review activity, and manage timesheets for $1 per user
- Budget matters ($1/user/mo, billed monthly vs $10/seat/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
Hubstaff
Time tracking and workforce management
Hubstaff's pricing is fair, offering a generous Free tier for single users.
Strengths
- Pro: Provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights.
- Pro: Automates team operations including timesheets, payroll, time-off requests, reporting, and invoicing.
- Pro: Offers advanced reporting with over 20 customizable reports for monitoring team performance and project progress.
- Pro: Features real-time alerts for projects nearing budget limits, enabling effective cost control.
- Pro: Integrates with over 35 high-end tools like Salesforce, Jira, Slack, Deel, and PayPal.
Weaknesses
- Con: The productivity monitoring features, such as screenshots and activity levels, may raise privacy concerns for some employees.
- Con: While it offers customization for monitoring, the presence of such features could still be perceived as intrusive by some teams.
- Con: The emphasis on mouse and keyboard activity for productivity tracking might not accurately reflect productivity in all roles or tasks.
Key features
TimoDesk
Track project time, review activity, and manage timesheets for $1 per user
At $1 per user per month, TimoDesk is exceptionally affordable for a time tracking tool with screenshots, activity monitoring, and project management features.
Key features
Plans and prices: Hubstaff vs TimoDesk
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Hubstaff |
| hubstaff.com/pricing read Oct 31, 2026 |
| TimoDesk |
| timodesk.com/pricing read Oct 19, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Hubstaff pricing and TimoDesk pricing.
Key Takeaways
Hubstaff
- Choose if you want time tracking and workforce management
TimoDesk
- Lower entry price: $1/user/mo, billed monthly vs $10/seat/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, TimoDesk leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Only Hubstaff has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 3,920 reviews); TimoDesk has none we can show.
- TimoDesk has the lower entry price: $1/user/mo, billed monthly (TimoDesk) against $10/seat/mo, billed monthly (Team) for Hubstaff.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Hubstaff and TimoDesk compare in 2026?
On the data below, TimoDesk leads on lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Only Hubstaff has a published user rating (4.4/5 from 3,920 reviews); TimoDesk has none we can show. TimoDesk has the lower entry price: $1/user/mo, billed monthly (TimoDesk) against $10/seat/mo, billed monthly (Team) for Hubstaff.
What are Hubstaff and TimoDesk used for?
Hubstaff: Time tracking and workforce management. TimoDesk: Track project time, review activity, and manage timesheets for $1 per user.
What does Hubstaff cost vs TimoDesk?
Hubstaff's cheapest paid plan is Team at $10/seat/mo, billed monthly. TimoDesk's cheapest paid plan is TimoDesk at $1/user/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 31, 2026.
What's the main difference between Hubstaff and TimoDesk?
Hubstaff's main strength: provides tangible time tracking data for improved decision-making and productivity insights. TimoDesk focuses on track project time, review activity, and manage timesheets for $1 per user.