Skip to content

Refuse vs CodeQL: Which is Better in 2026?

Choosing between Refuse and CodeQL comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.

Bottom line: CodeQL is our overall pick for security workflows. Pick Refuse if you need a free tier to start with.

··Methodology
Editor reviewed0 verified reviews comparedPricing checked Jul 2026

Short on time? Here's the quick answer

We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:

Refuse

Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD

Best for you if:

  • Blocks vulnerable package installations across 21 ecosystems.
  • Offers both hosted and self-hosted deployment options.

CodeQL

Discover vulnerabilities across a codebase with industry-leading semantic code analysis.

Best for you if:

  • Semantic code analysis engine for vulnerability discovery.
  • Allows querying code like data to find security flaws.
At a Glance
RefuseRefuse
CodeQLCodeQL
Starts at
FreeFree tier available
FreeFree tier available
Best For
SecuritySecurity
Rating
--
Free plan
Yes Yes

Choose Refuse or CodeQL?

Refuse

Choose Refuse if

Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD

  • Significantly enhances software supply chain security by preventing vulnerable package installations.
  • Supports a broad range of package managers and development environments.
  • Offers flexible deployment options including a free self-hosted solution and a generous free hosted tier.
CodeQL

Choose CodeQL if

Discover vulnerabilities across a codebase with industry-leading semantic code analysis.

  • Powerful code analysis
  • Security focus
  • GitHub integration
FeatureRefuseCodeQL
Pricing ModelFreemiumFreemium
User RatingNo ratings yetNo ratings yet
Categories
SecurityDeveloper Tools
SecurityDeveloper Tools

In-Depth Analysis

RefuseRefuse

Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD

Strengths

  • +Significantly enhances software supply chain security by preventing vulnerable package installations.
  • +Supports a broad range of package managers and development environments.
  • +Offers flexible deployment options including a free self-hosted solution and a generous free hosted tier.
  • +Provides specific safe version suggestions when blocking vulnerable packages.
  • +Easy to install and integrate into existing workflows (shell, CI/CD, agents).

Weaknesses

  • -Requires an additional step in the package installation workflow, which might introduce a slight overhead.
  • -The hosted Pro tier with higher scan limits is planned for future release.

Key features

Vulnerable package blockingSupport for 21 package ecosystems (npm, pip, cargo, gem, go, composer, dotnet, etc.)Dockerfile dependency scanning (apt, apk, dnf)GitHub Actions workflow integrationLinux distro-specific advisory checking (Debian, Ubuntu, Alpine, Red Hat)CLI for easy installation and configuration
Starts at Free

CodeQLCodeQL

Discover vulnerabilities across a codebase with industry-leading semantic code analysis.

Strengths

  • +Powerful code analysis
  • +Security focus
  • +GitHub integration
  • +Custom queries
  • +Free for public repos

Weaknesses

  • -Learning curve
  • -Query writing complex
  • -Slow scans
  • -Resource intensive
  • -False positives

Key features

Semantic code analysisSecurity queriesCustom queriesVulnerability detectionGitHub integrationMulti-language
Starts at Free

Pricing: Refuse vs CodeQL

PlanRefuseCodeQL
Tier 1
$0/ forever
OSS / Self-host
Free
Free (Public repos)
Tier 2
$0/ forever
Hosted Free
$30 month per committer
Code Security
Tier 3
$5/ month
Hosted Pro
$19 month per committer
Secret Protection

Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Refuse pricing and CodeQL pricing.

Who Should Use What?

On a budget?

Both are freemium. Compare plans on their websites.

Go with: Refuse

Want the highest-rated option?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call on ratings — compare on features and pricing.

Value user reviews?

Neither has ratings yet.

Too early to call — neither has ratings yet.

3 Questions to Help You Decide

1

What's your budget?

Both are freemium. Pricing won't help you decide here.

2

What's your use case?

Both are security tools. Compare their specific features to decide.

3

How important are ratings?

Neither has ratings yet.

Key Takeaways

CodeQL

  • Free tier available
  • Our pick for this comparison

Refuse

  • Choose if you want block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD

The Bottom Line

CodeQL is our pick.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Refuse or CodeQL better?

CodeQL is rated in our evaluation. Both are freemium.

What are Refuse and CodeQL used for?

Refuse: Block vulnerable package installs across your dev and CI/CD. CodeQL: Discover vulnerabilities across a codebase with industry-leading semantic code analysis..

What does Refuse cost vs CodeQL?

Refuse is freemium (free tier + paid plans). CodeQL is freemium (free tier + paid plans). Visit their websites for detailed pricing.

Related Comparisons & Resources

Compare other tools