Best LLM Rank Tracking Tools in 2026
Short answer: Promptwatch is the LLM rank tracker to buy in 2026 when several models have to share one invoice. Essential is $95/mo: you track 4 models, and the plan includes 50 prompts and 6,000 responses, with a 7-day trial. Peec is the pick when the report must show position on 3 models you choose, at the same entry price. Otterly Lite, at $29/mo for 15 prompts, fits a short daily list. Profound still publishes no paid price.
10 tools compared on price, features and fit, with prices checked on vendor pages in September 2026.
A report that covers several models is a different buy from a log of one assistant. Promptwatch is the 2026 default when ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and one more model must share a plan. The entry tier tracks four models and publishes a response cap sized for a daily check, so a multi-model week does not turn into a surprise overage.
Peec AI wins when the meeting needs a position, not a blended score. You spend three model slots to get visibility, position, sentiment, and share of voice on a daily view. Claude sits outside that self-serve menu, so a brief that names Claude should stay with Promptwatch. Skip Peec when the slide has to include every assistant.
Toolradar data: 130 SEO tools in this category are paid only (52%), inside a catalog of 252. The free-or-freemium share is 48% (14 with no charge, 106 freemium). A no-charge listing there is usually a keyword checker, and it will not show where a model ordered your brand.
Methodology: these 10 were chosen for a marketer who needs a rank across more than one model, measured against the 252 tools in SEO tools. Prices come from vendor pages read in September 2026, and no paid placement decided a rank. A ChatGPT-only question belongs on the ChatGPT rank tracker guide. Client rosters belong on the AI visibility tools for agencies guide.
Top Picks
Picked by editorial review, informed by G2 and Capterra review volume and rating and by media mentions, the signals behind our category rankings. How we rate
| Tool | Starting price | Rating | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promptwatch | From $95/mo | n/a | Teams that need Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT on one invoice. |
| Peec AI | $95/mo on Starter | n/a | Reports that have to name a position across the models you picked. |
| Otterly | $29/mo on Lite | 4.744 reviews | Solo marketers who want four engines in the base price. |
| Rankscale | $20/mo Essentials | 4.95 reviews | Buyers who want the bill to follow the engines they query. |
| SE Ranking | From $129/mo | 4.72,710 reviews | Teams that want an AI rank next to Google keywords. |
| AthenaHQ | Free plan, then $295/mo | 4.966 reviews | Teams that want to try several models before a paid plan. |
| Scrunch | $250/mo on Core | 4.671 reviews | A single brand that wants four models and a longer prompt list. |
| Semrush | $99/mo per user | 4.56,361 reviews | Semrush customers who need ChatGPT and AI Mode only. |
| Ahrefs | Index from $199/mo | 4.5713 reviews | Companies already named in AI answers who need the market sample. |
| Profound | No public paid price | 4.4325 reviews | Buyers who will sign a custom deal after the trial window. |
Teams that need Claude, Gemini, and ChatGPT on one invoice.
This pricing is best suited for businesses with a dedicated budget for AI search visibility and content generation.
Watch out
Potential for annual-only discounts not shown
Reports that have to name a position across the models you picked.
Peec AI's pricing is on the higher side for businesses just starting with AI search performance tracking.
Watch out
Additional AI models (Gemini, Claude) cost extra on Enterprise.
Solo marketers who want four engines in the base price.
Buyers who want the bill to follow the engines they query.
Rankscale's pricing starts at a very low $20/month for Essentials, but this tier offers zero credits, making it effectively a placeholder.
Watch out
Essentials tier has 0 credits, rendering it unusable for actual tracking.
Teams that want an AI rank next to Google keywords.
SE Ranking's pricing is quite competitive, especially with the 20% annual discount.
Watch out
Add-ons (AI Search, Content, Local) cost extra
Teams that want to try several models before a paid plan.
However, the monthly self-serve at $295 feels expensive given the annual discount.
A single brand that wants four models and a longer prompt list.
Scrunch's pricing is on the higher end, with the 'Core' plan at $250/month.
Semrush customers who need ChatGPT and AI Mode only.
Semrush is the most comprehensive all-in-one SEO and digital marketing platform, and its pricing reflects the breadth.
Watch out
Keyword tracking limits are per DAY, not per month: Pro gets 500 keywords total in Position Tracking, not 500 new keywords per month. Once you've added 500 keywords, you must remove old ones to add new
Companies already named in AI answers who need the market sample.
Ahrefs is the industry standard for backlink analysis and a serious contender for keyword research, but it remains one of the most expensive SEO tools on the market.
Watch out
Crawl credits are consumed per page crawled in Site Audit. A 50K-page site burns half of Lite's 100K monthly allocation in a single audit cycle. Standard's 500K credits handle larger sites but enterprise sites with 500K+ pages will need Advanced.
Buyers who will sign a custom deal after the trial window.
What an LLM rank tracker is
An LLM rank tracker records where a brand is ordered inside answers from large language models, then repeats that check so the position can move.
The invoice unit is not the rank. Promptwatch counts responses. Peec counts prompts times the models you switched on. Otterly counts search prompts that already include four engines. Rankscale spends a fraction of a credit on each engine call. A plan that looks cheap on prompts becomes the expensive one once Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity each consume their own answer. Buy the unit that matches a multi-model question, or you pay for a single assistant and call it a rank.
Position and a visibility score serve different meetings. Peec puts position on the same daily view as share of voice. SE Ranking says its AI Results Tracker shows where mentions and links rank in the answer, including average ranking inside generated responses. A blended score with no per-model split cannot be read back as a rank when a founder asks which assistant moved.
Why a Google rank tracker is the wrong meter
Google rank software stores a keyword's place on a results page. Large language models do not hand over an equivalent place. What you can record is the spot where the brand is named in an answer you picked, how often that naming happens, and which URL was cited. Keep only one of those three and the person who asked for rank gets a misleading chart.
Ahrefs' index is a market sample, not the prompt list you will defend. The index spans 451 million prompts a month. AI Overviews account for 312.9 million of that sample, and ChatGPT accounts for 30.9 million, so a rising score can be a Google surface with an AI label. The prompts you write are the rank. The GEO tools guide covers the wider stack, and the AEO and GEO tools guide covers the content side of the same job.
Nightwatch includes ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, AI Mode, and AI Overviews on every tier, down to an entry allowance of 50 AI prompts and 1,500 AI answers a month. It publishes no USD price, so a US buyer cannot place it on this page's dollar table. Writesonic's self-serve plans stop at ChatGPT, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews, with Starter at $79/mo billed annually, and all 10 AI platforms only on a custom Enterprise plan. If Google rankings already sit in the retainer, open Ahrefs vs Semrush before a second login joins the stack. The AI rank tracking guide covers Google rank with AI features, which is a different product.
Key Features to Look For
How many models the sticker includes (Essential)
Promptwatch's entry plan tracks 4 models from a menu that includes ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and others. Peec makes you choose 3 from ChatGPT, AI Mode, AI Overviews, Copilot, Gemini, and Naver AI, and Claude sits on Enterprise. Otterly includes ChatGPT, AI Overviews, Perplexity, and Copilot, then sells Claude, AI Mode, and Gemini as add-ons. The sticker is the product only after you know which assistants are already inside it.
A position you can say out loud (Essential)
On Peec, share of voice, sentiment, position, and visibility share one daily view versus competitors, and that is the line a rank report can quote. SE Ranking's AI Results Tracker records average ranking inside generated responses and shows how mentions and links place in the answer. A huge prompt index answers a market question. It does not answer the prompt you will defend in a meeting.
What one multi-model day costs (Essential)
Peec's own example is 25 prompts across 3 models for 30 days, which is 2,250 AI answers. Rankscale's calculator lists ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Mode at 0.25 credits a query, DeepSeek at 1, and Claude at 2, so a four-model day is not four copies of the cheap rate. AthenaHQ bills 1 credit per AI response, which means 11 models on one prompt spend 11 credits. Price the day before you promise a daily chart.
Prompt allowance versus response allowance (Essential)
Write the prompt list before you compare stickers. A 15-prompt entry can sample one category and cannot cover a catalog, a second country, and competitors together. A response cap that matches prompts times models times a month of days is a daily multi-model run. A response cap that matches prompts times 30 is one engine a day wearing a long engine list. Match the cap to the meeting, or the cheaper sticker is the one that runs out.
Projects, seats, and a second brand (Important)
Several entry plans include a shared login and a single project or workspace, so the team can see the rank and still cannot track a second brand. Scrunch caps Core at 5 user licenses and 1 brand workspace. Ahrefs' custom-prompt quotas sit inside a paid plan, and Semrush sells the toolkit per user. A second brand is a tier change, not a seat, on the plans that lock the workspace.
A trial that uses your prompts (Important)
A trial is useful only if your own prompts run in it. Profound hands you a recommended set that stays locked, so the screenshot belongs to Profound's category. Promptwatch and Rankscale Pro both publish a 7-day trial. SE Ranking's trial runs 14 days and allows 20 AI prompts a day. The Semrush toolkit offers no trial, which means the opening invoice is the only test.
What to weigh before you pay
Write the model list before the prompt list. A tool that includes four engines in the sticker is a different product from one that makes you spend a slot or a credit on each.
Ask whether the export shows a position per model or a single score. Use the score when the question is a broad sample, and use the position when the question is a prompt you wrote.
Match the check to the meeting. A monthly report can live on a weekly pull, and a daily run across every model is how credits and answer caps disappear.
When Google keywords are already on the retainer, a suite that tracks five AI engines beats a second pure-play login. When they are not, skip a large keyword bundle bought only to reach a short model list.
Evaluation Checklist
Write the model list first, and confirm each one is included, a slot you must select, or a credit you choose to spend.
Run prompts you will actually report. A locked recommended set measures the vendor's category, not yours.
Ask what one model-day costs in prompts, credits, checks, or answers, and multiply by a month before you sign.
Separate a position on your prompts from an index score, and write down which number the monthly report will use.
Read the project cap before you sign. Seats do not create a second brand when the plan allows only one workspace.
Pricing Overview
Four models on a flat entry plan
Promptwatch and Otterly Lite suit a first multi-model list, not a full catalog.
Under $100/mo
Position on a brand plan
Peec and SE Ranking Core pair a real prompt count with a named rank view.
Published brand tiers
Credit or response meter
A few hundred
About $100 to $200
Contract
Profound's Enterprise quote starts once the trial is too small and a public price is required.
Custom
Pricing Comparison
| Tool | Models in the price | Entry price | Allowance | Try before pay |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Promptwatch | 4 models at a time | $95/mo Essential | 50 prompts, 6,000 responses | 7-day trial |
Choose 3 of 6 | Same entry price | 50 prompts, 4,500 answers | Trial offered, length not listed | |
Otterly | 4 engines included | $29/mo Lite | 15 prompts checked daily | Trial offered, day count unpublished |
Rankscale | Per engine, from 0.25 credits | From $20/mo | Pro includes 1,200 credits | Pro trial lasts 7 days |
5 engines in the toolkit | $129/mo on Core | 100 prompts, every day | 14-day trial, 20 AI prompts daily | |
5 on free, 11 on Starter | Free, then $295/mo | 3,600 credits on Starter | Free tier includes 300 credits | |
Scrunch | 4 LLMs on Core | $250/mo for Core | 125 prompts and 1 workspace | Trial length not published |
Semrush | ChatGPT and AI Mode | $99/mo for the toolkit | 25 tracked prompts | No trial on the toolkit |
Ahrefs | 6 platforms in the index | $199/mo for the index | Lite allows 5 custom prompts | Visibility preview is free |
Profound | 3 on the trial, up to 9 later | Quote only | Trial covers 50 prompts daily | 7 days on a fixed prompt set |
Vendor pages checked in September 2026: Promptwatch pricing, Peec pricing, Otterly pricing, Rankscale pricing, SE Ranking subscription, SE Ranking AI visibility, AthenaHQ pricing, Scrunch pricing, Semrush toolkit article, Ahrefs Brand Radar, Profound pricing.
Mistakes to Avoid
- ×
A short prompt list can make it look like the models never name the brand, when the missing lines are the ones buyers actually type.
- ×
Reading Ahrefs' index as a rank across LLMs. AI Overviews are most of that 451 million prompt sample, so the headline can move while ChatGPT and Gemini do not.
- ×
Selecting three models on Peec and leaving out the assistant the meeting is about, then reporting a Gemini position as a Claude rank.
- ×
Buying Semrush's toolkit when the team needs Claude or Perplexity, and paying suite prices for ChatGPT and AI Mode only.
- ×
A Profound trial screenshot in a board deck. The prompts were Profound's recommendations, and editing them was not allowed.
Expert Tips
- →
- →
Count branded prompts apart from unbranded ones. A place on the company name does not tell you the category question, and folding them together hides a brand that shows up only after the shopper already knows the name.
- →
Match the cadence to the meeting you will actually hold. A monthly report can live on a weekly pull. Running every engine every day is what empties Nightwatch's answer cap and Rankscale's credits. Nightwatch still publishes no USD price.
- →
If Google rankings are the retainer, start with SE Ranking and use the SEO tools guide. If the question is several LLMs and no keyword bundle, start with Promptwatch or Peec. If the question is only ChatGPT, use the ChatGPT rank tracker guide.
- →
Copy the engine list into the scope in the same words the pricing page uses. Writesonic's self-serve plans stop at ChatGPT, Gemini, and AI Overviews, and the other platforms are an Enterprise quote.
Red Flags to Watch For
- !
Thousands of Google keywords bundled into a plan whose only brief is an LLM rank. You pay again for a product the team already owns.
- !
An AI visibility score with no per-model split, sold as a position you cannot reproduce from a prompt.
- !
Claude listed in a sales deck and priced as Enterprise, or as an add-on that costs as much as a dedicated tracker.
- !
Treating a credit, a prompt, and an answer as one unit, which turns a single question into three invoices.
- !
Screenshots from a trial whose prompts cannot be edited, offered as proof of where your category ranks.
The Bottom Line
Buy Promptwatch when four models have to share one invoice and a daily response cap. Buy Peec when the report has to say position, and you can live with three model slots that do not include Claude.
Use Otterly when a short list and four included engines are enough, and price the Claude and Gemini add-ons before you promise them. Use SE Ranking when Google keywords share the invoice. Use Rankscale when the credit math should rise only for the engines you query.
AthenaHQ is the free way to see a first multi-model response. Scrunch's entry plan is one workspace and four models, with Claude on the custom tier. Keep Semrush and Ahrefs for teams that already pay them, and keep the prompt caps honest. Profound is a trial, then a quote. We ranked 10 products against the 252 tools in the category, using September 2026 vendor pages and no paid placement. Cite this: Toolradar, "Best LLM rank tracking tools 2026", September 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the best LLM rank tracker in 2026?
Promptwatch is the best default in 2026 when several models have to share one price. You track 4 models, the plan includes 50 prompts and 6,000 responses, and a 7-day trial lets you test your own list. Peec is the better buy when the report must show position, sentiment, and share of voice, on 3 models you choose, and it is the wrong buy if Claude has to be one of them. Otterly Lite, at $29/mo for 15 prompts, fits when four engines must already be in the sticker and the list is short.
How much does LLM rank tracking cost?
Verified in September 2026, self-serve USD prices run from Rankscale Essentials at $20/mo and Otterly Lite through Promptwatch and Peec at the entry sticker, up to SE Ranking Core at $129/mo and Ahrefs' AI Visibility Index at $199/mo. Scrunch Core is $250/mo for 125 prompts. AthenaHQ Starter is $295/mo for 3,600 responses. The Semrush toolkit is a per-user add-on for 25 prompts. Profound publishes no paid price, and Nightwatch does not publish a USD price.
Is there a free LLM rank tracker?
AthenaHQ Essential includes 300 free credits on Copilot, Gemini, AI Overviews, Perplexity, and ChatGPT, enough to learn whether a short list returns your name before a card is charged. Custom prompts at Ahrefs require a paid plan, though a visibility preview is free. Profound's trial locks the prompt set. Trials exist at SE Ranking, Rankscale Pro, Otterly, and Promptwatch. Semrush's AI Visibility Toolkit has none. A free keyword tool in the SEO category is not an LLM rank tracker.
Promptwatch vs Peec: which tracks LLM rank better?
Promptwatch is the better coverage buy, because four model slots can include Claude and Perplexity, and the response cap matches a daily run. Peec is the better rank if you need position on the overview and you will select the right three models, at the same entry price. Peec Pro, at $245/mo, is 150 prompts and 2 projects. Promptwatch Professional is that same Pro price for 150 prompts, 18,000 responses, and 2 projects. Pick Peec for the position metric, and pick Promptwatch when Claude has to be in the problem Peec cannot solve on Starter.
Can Semrush or Ahrefs replace a dedicated LLM rank tracker?
Both suites cover a narrow cut, and that cut falls behind a dedicated tracker once several models are in the brief. The Semrush toolkit tracks 25 prompts on AI Mode and ChatGPT, and it offers no trial. Lite at Ahrefs includes 5 custom prompts. The index samples 451 million prompts and is mostly AI Overviews. Custom prompts on all models are $699/mo. Once the brief needs Claude, or a prompt list you wrote, a dedicated plan is the better buy. The suite comparison is Ahrefs vs Semrush.
Which terms belong in an LLM rank contract?
Spell out every model, how many prompts, how often the check runs, and whether the metric is position. Otherwise a score you cannot explain can satisfy the contract. Turn down a blended score standing in for a per-model position. Turn down one workspace when you have two brands, the trap on Otterly Lite and Scrunch Core. Leave Profound off the order until a dollar is on the page: the public offer is a custom Enterprise plan after a 7-day trial.
Cite this page: Toolradar, "Best LLM Rank Tracking Tools in 2026", updated September 2026, https://toolradar.com/guides/best-llm-rank-tracking-tools
Related Guides
From the team behind Toolradar
SEO for B2B SaaS
Tools matter less than execution. We rank B2B SaaS on Google + AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude).
See how we work