Toolradar Research
DevOps software statistics 2026
First-party data on the 414 DevOps tools Toolradar tracks: 77% offer a free way in, the highest free-tier share in this research series, against only 47,889 aggregated reviews. DevOps is open first and reviewed last.

Founder, Toolradar & Dupple
Key findings
What the data shows.
- 01
414 DevOps tools tracked, or 3.9% of the 10,619-tool directory. (Source: Toolradar directory, September 17, 2026.)
- 02
77% offer a free tier or freemium plan (318 of 414), the highest free-access share in this research series. Only 23% are paid-only. (Source: Toolradar directory, September 17, 2026.)
- 03
236 rated tools hold 47,889 reviews and average 4.47 unweighted, 4.42 weighted. That is a thin review layer for a category this size. (Source: Toolradar directory, September 17, 2026.)
- 04
The median paid plan starts at $30 a month, but the mean is $218, a wide gap because a few enterprise platforms sit on top of cheap and free tools. (Source: Toolradar directory, September 17, 2026.)
- 05
82% of container-using organizations run Kubernetes in production, and 98% of surveyed organizations now use cloud native techniques. (Source: CNCF Annual Survey 2025.)
About the research
How we built this report.
Toolradar tool database. Editorial review with weekly pricing verification.
2026. Snapshot taken September 17, 2026. Refresh due Dec 17, 2026.
Public scoring rubric. See how we rate for the full criteria.
Creative Commons BY 4.0. Quote, link, and reuse with attribution.
DevOps is the opposite of customer support, and the catalog makes that measurable. Toolradar tracks 414 DevOps tools. 77% offer a free tier or freemium plan (318 of 414). Customer support, in the same snapshot, is a paid-first category. DevOps is not. DevOps also holds only 47,889 aggregated third-party reviews across 236 rated tools, a fraction of the review mass in communication or ecommerce, at an average of 4.47 out of 5. This is a large category that grew up on open source. People run the tools. They do not write G2 reviews about them.
Every figure below is computed from the Toolradar directory on September 17, 2026. The live dashboard is DevOps statistics. The buyer ranking is best DevOps software.
How large the DevOps category is
We track 414 published tools, or 3.9% of the catalog. 72% (299 of 414) were added to Toolradar in 2026. The category is bigger than ecommerce and far bigger than customer support, and it has a fraction of their reviews. That is the first-party finding. DevOps software is adopted in production long before it is rated on a review site.
CNCF's 2025 annual survey, 628 respondents in September 2025, puts numbers under that habit. 98% of organizations have adopted cloud native techniques. Kubernetes usage in production has reached 82% among container users. The foundation lists 234 projects and more than 270,000 contributors (CNCF Annual Survey 2025). Our directory is the vendor and project supply sitting on top of that install base.
How DevOps tools are priced
77% of the 414 tools offer a free tier or freemium plan (318 tools). 24% are fully free. 23% are paid-only. No other category in this series comes close. Engineers expect to clone a repo, run a binary, and pay later if a company feature shows up.
n = 414 tools, September 17, 2026How DevOps software are priced
For the 82 tools that publish a paid tier, the median entry price is $30 a month and the mean is $218. The mean is several times the median because a small set of enterprise platforms (hosted CI, observability suites, commercial Kubernetes) sit on top of a free and cheap majority. Use the median if you are buying a single tool. Use the mean only as a warning that the top of the market is a different product.
n = 82 tools with a published paid tierEntry price distribution
The catalog-wide median entry is $20 (software pricing statistics). DevOps matches that median and then diverges: most tools never reach a paid tier at all.
How DevOps tools are rated
236 of 414 tools carry a rating (57%), lower coverage than support or communication. Those ratings rest on 47,889 reviews. Unweighted mean 4.47. Weighted mean 4.42.
n = 236 rated toolsRating distribution
The highest-rated tools with at least 250 aggregated reviews:
| # | Tool | Rating | Reviews |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Glasskube | 4.80 | 543 |
| 2 | Buddy | 4.80 | 397 |
| 3 | Bitrise | 4.80 | 313 |
| 4 | Portainer | 4.80 | 298 |
| 5 | Google Cloud Storage | 4.70 | 2,892 |
| 6 | Wiz | 4.70 | 845 |
| 7 | Checkmk | 4.70 | 344 |
| 8 | Aikido Security | 4.70 | 260 |
| 9 | 1Password Secrets | 4.60 | 1,813 |
| 10 | UptimeRobot | 4.60 | 1,535 |
Glasskube leads at 4.80. The list is CI, containers, and cloud storage, not the Kubernetes distributions most teams actually run. That is the coverage gap. The tools with public review profiles are not always the tools in production. Treat the leaderboard as satisfaction among the tools that bother to collect reviews, not as a map of the stack.
Review volume by platform:
| Review platform | Tools with a profile | Aggregated reviews | Mean rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| G2 | 221 | 36,347 | 4.47 |
| Capterra | 62 | 6,941 | 4.68 |
| Trustpilot | 16 | 2,478 | 2.93 |
| SourceForge | 34 | 1,989 | 4.31 |
| Peerspot | 6 | 132 | 4.15 |
| TrustRadius | 1 | 2 | 4.60 |
Three tools with enough public reviews to compare are Portainer, Bitrise, and Buddy. The full ranked set is on our best DevOps software page.
What the survey says teams run next
The same CNCF survey that measured Kubernetes in production also measured what that cluster is for. 66% of organizations that host AI workloads use Kubernetes to run generative AI, 23% fully and 43% in part. 52% of organizations do not train models at all. 47% deploy AI models only occasionally; 7% deploy daily (CNCF).
The stack is becoming the AI runtime. That is why a category that is 77% free still has a $218 mean: inference platforms and hosted CI are where the money moved, while the orchestrator underneath stayed open.
How often DevOps pricing moves
Our pricing tracker logged 17 pricing changes for these tools in 2026, 0 of them applied. Free tools do not show up in that log. The paid minority is where the invoice changes, usually when usage or seat add-ons land.
How this data was measured
Every figure in this report is computed live from the Toolradar directory on September 17, 2026, covering the 414 published tools we categorize under DevOps. Pricing model is read from each vendor's official pricing page. The entry price is the cheapest positive monthly tier a tool publishes. Ratings and review counts are aggregated from third-party platforms (G2, Capterra, Trustpilot and others), not from Toolradar's own reviews. The leaderboard floor is 250 aggregated reviews. External statistics are cited inline and link to the exact source page. This is a directory snapshot, not a survey.
Cite this report
- APA: Corneloup, L. (2026). DevOps software statistics 2026. Toolradar Research. https://toolradar.com/reports/devops-software-statistics
- MLA: Corneloup, Louis. "DevOps Software Statistics 2026." Toolradar Research, 17 Sept. 2026, toolradar.com/reports/devops-software-statistics.
Browse the full category on the best DevOps software page, or explore all of Toolradar Research.
Cite this report
Use the data, credit the source.
Released under Creative Commons BY 4.0. You may quote, link, and reuse the data with attribution.
More research
The high-volume low-score list 2026: 35 tools buyers still hate
35 published tools in the Toolradar directory hold at least 2,000 aggregated reviews and still score 3.60 or below. They account for 358,490 reviews, 7.0% of the 5.10 million in the catalog. LinkedIn Ads sits at 1.20. PayPal and Zoom are on the list.
Stock assets software statistics 2026
First-party data on the 70 stock asset tools Toolradar tracks: Envato Elements at 3.20 from 9,151 reviews against Flaticon at 4.80 from 6,033, with Pond5 leading volume at 4.50 from 16,034.
Health and fitness software statistics 2026
First-party data on the 74 health and fitness tools Toolradar tracks: Breathwrk at 2.80 from 2,666 reviews against Everfit at 4.80, with Mindbody leading volume at 3.90 from 3,469.