Skip to content
Reviews onG2SourceForge
6 reviews tracked

The Bottom Line

Entry price

Free plan available, paid tiers above

Biggest pro

Git-friendly API client

Biggest con

Newer tool (less mature)

TL;DR - Bruno

  • Bruno is an open-source IDE for exploring and testing APIs, alternative to Postman
  • It stores collections in your filesystem with Git-friendly plain text files
  • Free and open-source
Pricing: Free plan available
Best for: Growing teams
4.7/5 across review platforms

What is Bruno?

Editorial review
Bruno is an API client that stores collections in plain files, not the cloud. Like Postman, but your requests live in Git alongside your code, version-controlled and shareable without vendor lock-in. The interface is clean and focused. Collections are just folders with JSON files. No account required, no syncing complexity. Developers who want API testing tools without cloud dependencies choose Bruno for an approach that fits development workflows naturally.

Available on: Web, Windows, macOS, Linux

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Git-friendly API client
  • Files stored locally (no cloud)
  • Fast and lightweight
  • Open source
  • Markdown-based collections

Cons

  • Newer tool (less mature)
  • Fewer integrations
  • Team features limited
  • Community smaller
  • Some features missing vs Postman

Ratings Across the Web

4.7(6 reviews)

Bruno holds an aggregate rating of 4.7 out of 5 from 6 reviews across G2 and SourceForge, last checked May 29, 2026.

What people say

Bruno is simple, intuitive, ideal for developers and testers.via G2
Bruno doesn't store (steal) my information via the cloud. I can work locally, and more importantly with Git.via SourceForge

Ratings aggregated from independent review platforms. Learn more

Key Features

API clientOpen sourceGit-friendlyOfflineBru languagePostman alternative

Pricing Plans

Free Trial

Pricing checked Aug 24, 2026

Free

Open source

  • HTTP, REST, GraphQL
  • Git integration
  • Offline only
  • Core features
Most Popular

Pro

$6/month per user

Teams

  • Git UI
  • OAS generation
  • Priority support

Ultimate

$11/month per user

Enterprise

  • Test reports
  • Secret managers
  • Premium support

Is Bruno worth the price?

90/100

Bruno is the most developer-friendly API client on the market, fully open-source, stores collections as plain files in your Git repo (no cloud sync needed), and the free tier is genuinely usable without artificial limits on requests or collections.

Pro at $6/user/month adds native Git UI integration and unlimited workspaces, while Ultimate at $11/user/month brings enterprise features. Compared to Postman, which recently restricted its free plan to a single user and charges $19/user/month for teams, Bruno is dramatically cheaper while offering a philosophy that resonates with developers: your API collections are just files, version-controlled alongside your code.

The tradeoff is a smaller ecosystem, no Postman-style public API marketplace, fewer integrations, and a younger product with some rough edges.

Hidden Costs & Gotchas

The free tier limits you to 2 workspaces. For most individual developers this is fine, but teams working across multiple projects will need Pro.

Pro plan pricing ($6/user/month) requires annual billing. Monthly pricing is not publicly listed, suggesting it may be higher.

No built-in cloud sync, collections live in your filesystem/Git. Teams without strong Git workflows may find collaboration harder than Postman cloud collections.

Import from Postman works but is not always perfect. Complex Postman collections with pre-request scripts may need manual adjustment.

The extension/plugin ecosystem is much smaller than Postman. If you rely on specific Postman integrations, verify Bruno supports them before switching.

OpenAPI sync is limited

free gets none, Pro gets 5/month, only Ultimate gets unlimited. Teams heavily using OpenAPI specs may need Ultimate.

How Bruno Compares to Competitors

Postman is the market leader with the largest ecosystem, public API marketplace, and AI features (Postbot), but has become expensive ($19/user/month for teams) and forces cloud sync that many developers dislike.

Insomnia (Kong) is similar in philosophy to Bruno, open-source core with paid collaboration, but has struggled with direction changes since the Kong acquisition. Hoppscotch is the other strong open-source alternative with the most generous free tier (unlimited everything) but less Git-native than Bruno. Bruno unique selling point is treating API collections as plain files: they live in your repo, diff cleanly, and never touch a cloud service.

How Bruno's pricing compares

At $6/mo, Bruno is the most affordable of its 4 direct competitors.

Bruno
$6
$10

Entry paid plan, monthly. Pricing checked Aug 24, 2026.

Reviews

Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT cover
$99Free with your review

Review Bruno, get a free AI guide

Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.

Write a review
4.7/5

Across 6 verified user reviews on G2, SourceForge

Add your hands-on experience using the offer above to help the next buyer.

Best Bruno Alternatives

Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.

Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.

Explore More

Bruno FAQ

How does Bruno differ from Postman in handling API collections?

Bruno stores API collections as plain files locally, allowing them to be version-controlled in Git alongside your code. In contrast, Postman typically stores collections in the cloud, which can introduce vendor lock-in.

Which teams would benefit most from using Bruno?

Teams that prioritize version control and local storage for their API testing tools will find Bruno particularly useful. It is well-suited for developers who want their API requests to live in Git and avoid cloud dependencies.

What kind of use case is Bruno designed for?

Bruno is designed for API testing and development workflows where developers need a fast, lightweight client. Its focus on local file storage and Git integration makes it ideal for managing API requests directly within a project's codebase.

What are the main trade-offs when choosing Bruno?

Bruno is a newer tool with a smaller community and fewer integrations compared to more established options. It also has limited team features and may be missing some functionalities found in competitors like Postman.

How is Bruno priced?

Bruno is available on a free tier, offering core functionalities without cost. For users requiring additional usage or advanced features, paid plans are available.

Can Bruno collections be easily shared and version-controlled?

Yes, Bruno collections are stored as plain JSON files within folders, making them inherently shareable and easy to version-control. This allows requests to be managed in Git alongside your code without syncing complexity.

Source: usebruno.com

Guides & Articles