MediaWiki
Claim this toolCollect, organize, and share knowledge with a powerful, multilingual, and extensible wiki platform.
Free, no paid tier Visit WebsiteThe Bottom Line
- Price
- Free, no paid tier. Compare plans
Key facts
- Free and open-source wiki software for knowledge collection and organization.
- Powers Wikipedia and thousands of other websites and organizations.
- Highly customizable, extensible, and multilingual with strong community support.
Pros
- Completely free and open-source
- Highly customizable and extensible
- Robust and reliable, proven by Wikipedia
- Strong community support and extensive documentation
- Supports a vast number of languages
Cons
- Requires technical knowledge for setup and maintenance
- Can be complex to configure for advanced use cases
- Steep learning curve for new users unfamiliar with wiki syntax
What is MediaWiki?
Available on: Web
Ratings Across the Web
MediaWiki holds an aggregate rating of 4.4 out of 5 from 34 reviews across G2 and Capterra, last checked September 17, 2026.
Ratings aggregated from independent review platforms. Learn more
Preview
Key Features
- Knowledge collection and organization
- Multilingual support
- Extensible via extensions
- Customizable interface
- User and permission management
- Page editing and formatting (Wikitext, VisualEditor)
- Search functionality
- Version history and change tracking
Pricing Plans
Pricing checked Oct 2, 2026. Source: mediawiki.org, read Oct 2, 2026
| Plan | Price | Details |
|---|---|---|
| MediaWiki | Free |
+4 more Show less
|
Is MediaWiki worth the price?
MediaWiki's pricing is exceptionally generous, being entirely free.
This makes it an incredibly fair and accessible option compared to any paid alternatives on the market. It's best for individuals, small teams, and large organizations looking for a powerful wiki solution without any financial investment.
MediaWiki by the numbers
| Metric | MediaWiki | Peer median | Position (1 is best) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free plan | Yes | 61% have one | n/a |
| Listed as an alternative to | 3 tools | 1 | #23 of 80 (joint) |
| User rating | 4.4/5 (across the web, 34 ratings) | 4.4/5 | #19 of 41 (joint) tools with 20+ reviews |
| Compare-page visits, last 30 days | 27 visits | 27 | #8 of 16 (joint) tools with 20+ compare-page visits |
Listed as an alternative to: #23 on 2026-10-16 to #23 on 2026-11-02 (rank among 80 tools, 1 is best).
Each position is counted among the tools that have data for that row, as noted under it. All CMS data · How we compute this. Advertising and placement fees are not inputs to any position. Visit counts include visits from every source.
Cite this: Toolradar, “MediaWiki by the numbers”, Nov 2026.
Reviews
Review MediaWiki, get a free AI guide
Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.
Across 34 verified user reviews on G2, Capterra
Add your hands-on experience using the offer above to help the next buyer.
Best MediaWiki Alternatives
Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.
Documentation platform for product and API docs
Documentation for technical teams
Generate documentation sites from markdown
Open source documentation framework
Documentation site builder by Astro
Static site generator for Vue.js
Still deciding?
Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.
Explore More
MediaWiki FAQ
How does MediaWiki facilitate community collaboration?
Which teams would benefit most from using MediaWiki?
How does MediaWiki compare to Docusaurus for documentation?
What kind of technical knowledge is needed to implement MediaWiki?
Does MediaWiki include a free tier?
Can MediaWiki be customized to fit specific organizational needs?
Source: mediawiki.org