Score Dev
UnclaimedConfigure all your workloads consistently across local and remote environments with a single specification.
Visit WebsiteFreeVisit Website
TL;DR - Score Dev
- Defines workload configurations in a single, platform-agnostic `score.yaml` file.
- Ensures consistent configuration across local and remote environments.
- Reduces developer cognitive load by abstracting infrastructure complexities.
Pricing: Free forever
Best for: Individuals & startups
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Reduces cognitive load for developers by abstracting infrastructure details
- Eliminates YAML bloat and repetitive configuration work
- Prevents configuration drift between environments
- Enables seamless transition from local development to production
- Open-source and community-driven
Cons
- Requires adoption of a new specification format
- Relies on community contributions for broader platform integrations beyond initial implementations
Key Features
Platform-agnostic workload specificationSingle source of truth for workload configuration (`score.yaml`)Consistent configuration from local to production environmentsDeclarative resource definitionExtendable and customizable specificationIntegration with existing workflowsSupport for environment-specific overridesSupport for platform-specific extensions
Pricing
Free
Score Dev is completely free to use with no hidden costs.
About Score Dev
By Toolradar Team·
Score is an open-source, developer-centric, and platform-agnostic workload specification designed to simplify configuration management. It allows developers to define all the resources and requirements for their applications in a single `score.yaml` file, eliminating the need to become experts in various deployment technologies. This approach ensures consistent configuration from local development to production environments, reducing cognitive load and preventing configuration drift.
By abstracting away environment-specific implementation details, Score enables developers to focus on shipping features rather than managing infrastructure complexities. It integrates seamlessly into existing workflows, allowing the same workload definition to be translated and deployed across different technology stacks, such as Docker Compose or Kubernetes, with the potential for integration with other platforms like Amazon ECS, Google Cloud Run, or Nomad.
How we evaluate tools →Source: score.dev
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to review Score Dev!
Best Score Dev Alternatives
Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.
HelmFree
Package manager for Kubernetes applications
RailwayFreemium
Instant deployment platform
PulumiFreemium
Infrastructure as code in any language
DigitalOceanPaid
Simple cloud infrastructure
AWS CloudFormationPaid
Infrastructure as code for AWS using YAML or JSON templates
FliptFree
Open-source feature flag infrastructure
Explore More
Score Dev FAQ
How does Score handle environment-specific configurations or secrets without hardcoding them in the `score.yaml` file?
The `score.yaml` file defines the *needs* of the workload declaratively, such as requiring a database or listening on a port. Environment-specific values, like database connection strings or exact port numbers in a Kubernetes environment, are handled by the Score implementation (e.g., `score-k8s` or `score-compose`) during the generation phase, allowing for overrides and platform-specific details to be injected without altering the core `score.yaml`.
What is the difference between the Score Specification and a Score Implementation like `score-compose` or `score-k8s`?
The Score Specification is the standardized, platform-agnostic schema (`score.yaml`) that defines a workload's requirements. A Score Implementation, such as `score-compose` or `score-k8s`, is a command-line tool that takes a `score.yaml` file and translates it into the native configuration files for a specific target platform, like `docker-compose.yaml` for Docker Compose or Kubernetes manifests for Kubernetes.
Can Score be used with existing CI/CD pipelines, or does it require a complete overhaul of the deployment process?
Score is designed to integrate seamlessly into existing workflows. It introduces a single `score.yaml` file to your workload's repository. Your CI/CD pipeline would then simply incorporate a step to run the appropriate Score Implementation (e.g., `score-k8s generate`) to produce the platform-specific deployment files, which are then used by your existing deployment tools (e.g., `kubectl apply`).
What kind of resources can be declared in a `score.yaml` file, beyond basic containers and variables?
A `score.yaml` file allows for the declarative definition of various workload requirements, including containers with their images and environment variables, network ports, and external resources such as databases (e.g., `type: postgres`). The specification is extendable, allowing for additional properties or requirements to be listed as needed by specific platforms or custom extensions.
How does Score compare to Helm charts or Kustomize for managing Kubernetes configurations?
Score operates at a higher level of abstraction than Helm charts or Kustomize. While Helm and Kustomize are Kubernetes-specific tools for templating and customizing Kubernetes manifests, Score provides a platform-agnostic definition of a workload's needs. A Score Implementation for Kubernetes would generate Kubernetes manifests, which could then potentially be further managed or customized by tools like Kustomize or deployed via Helm, but Score itself isn't tied to Kubernetes.
Source: score.dev