Asana vs Runn: Pricing and Ratings Compared (2026)
Entry prices and free plans as read on each vendor's pricing page, and user ratings as published on review sites, for Asana and Runn side by side. This page compares data; it is not a hands-on review.
On the data: On the data below, Asana leads on a free plan; Runn leads on higher user rating and lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Asana
Orchestrate work from tasks to initiatives with projects and automation
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
Runn
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
Best for you if:
- • You want provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies
| At a Glance | Asana | Runn |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | Free plan, paid from $10.99/mo, billed monthly Starter plan | From $7/mo, billed monthly Lite plan |
Category | Project Management Productivity | Project Management Task Management |
Rating | 4.4/5 G2 4.4 · Capterra 4.5 27,636 reviews | 4.8/5 Capterra 4.8 · G2 4.5 34 reviews |
Free plan | Yes | No |
Watch out for | Starter caps automation at 250 runs/month across the entire workspace, a single daily rule on 10 boards burns through this in 25 days, forcing an upgrade to Advanced at 2.3x the price | n/a |
Choose Asana or Runn?
Choose Asana if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want multiple project views
- You want good workflow automation
Choose Runn if
- You want provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies
- You want significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods
- Budget matters ($7/mo, billed monthly vs $10.99/mo, billed monthly)
In-Depth Analysis
Asana
Orchestrate work from tasks to initiatives with projects and automation
Asana is the structured project management tool for teams that need goals, portfolios, and workflow automation, not just task boards.
Watch out
Starter caps automation at 250 runs/month across the entire workspace, a single daily rule on 10 boards burns through this in 25 days, forcing an upgrade to Advanced at 2.3x the price
Strengths
- Pro: Multiple project views
- Pro: Good workflow automation
- Pro: Strong integrations
- Pro: Goals and portfolio tracking
Weaknesses
- Con: Can be complex for simple needs
- Con: Some features require higher tiers
- Con: Mobile app less powerful
Key features
Runn
Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
Runn's pricing is fair for its comprehensive feature set, especially with the Standard tier at $11 per resource seat/month offering significant value.
Strengths
- Pro: Provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies.
- Pro: Significantly reduces time spent on planning and scheduling compared to manual methods.
- Pro: Helps prevent employee burnout by balancing workloads effectively.
- Pro: Improves profitability and utilization by optimizing resource allocation.
- Pro: Offers clear visibility into future capacity and project pipeline for strategic decision-making.
Weaknesses
- Con: No specific cons were mentioned in the provided text.
Key features
Plans and prices: Asana vs Runn
| Tool | Plans and prices | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Asana |
| asana.com/pricing read Oct 14, 2026 |
| Runn |
| runn.io/pricing read Oct 13, 2026 |
Prices as read on each vendor's own pricing page on the date shown. Plans are listed per tool and are not matched against the other tool's plans: a plan name or price in one column says nothing about the same row in the other. Details on Asana pricing and Runn pricing.
Key Takeaways
Asana
- Has a free plan
Runn
- Higher user rating: 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5
- Lower entry price: $7/mo, billed monthly vs $10.99/mo, billed monthly
What the data shows
On the data below, Asana leads on a free plan; Runn leads on higher user rating and lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair.
- Runn has the higher user rating (4.4/5 from 27,636 reviews for Asana, 4.8/5 from 34 reviews for Runn).
- Runn has the lower entry price: $7/mo, billed monthly (Lite) against $10.99/mo, billed monthly (Starter) for Asana.
- Only Asana has a free plan.
Criteria: user rating (only above 20 reviews on both sides, gap of 0.2 or more), entry price (only on the same billing basis), free plan. How we rate
Frequently Asked Questions
How do Asana and Runn compare in 2026?
On the data below, Asana leads on a free plan; Runn leads on higher user rating and lower entry price. We do not name an overall winner for this pair. Runn has the higher user rating (4.4/5 from 27,636 reviews for Asana, 4.8/5 from 34 reviews for Runn). Runn has the lower entry price: $7/mo, billed monthly (Lite) against $10.99/mo, billed monthly (Starter) for Asana. Only Asana has a free plan.
What are Asana and Runn used for?
Asana: Orchestrate work from tasks to initiatives with projects and automation. Runn: Strategic resource management software for maximizing capacity, utilization, and project delivery.
What does Asana cost vs Runn?
Asana's cheapest paid plan is Starter at $10.99/mo, billed monthly; it also has a free plan. Runn's cheapest paid plan is Lite at $7/mo, billed monthly. Prices read on the vendors' pricing pages, latest check Oct 14, 2026.
What's the main difference between Asana and Runn?
Asana's main strength: multiple project views. Runn's main strength: provides a single source of truth for resource data, reducing inconsistencies.