Greenhouse vs Workable: Which Should You Choose in 2026?
Choosing between Greenhouse and Workable comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
We've tested both tools. Here's who should pick what:
Greenhouse
Hiring software for growing companies
Best for you if:
- • You want the higher-rated option (8.7/10 vs 8.4/10)
- • Enterprise applicant tracking system for structured hiring
- • Scorecards and interview stages reduce bias
Workable
Recruiting software for hiring teams
Best for you if:
- • Workable is an applicant tracking system for hiring teams
- • It provides job posting, candidate management, and interviewing tools
| At a Glance |  Greenhouse | |
|---|---|---|
Price | Paid | Paid |
Best For | ATS | ATS |
Rating | 87/100 | 84/100 |
| Feature | Greenhouse | Workable |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Paid | Paid |
| Editorial Score | 87 | 84 |
| Community Rating | No ratings yet | No ratings yet |
| Total Reviews | 0 | 0 |
| Community Upvotes | 0 | 0 |
| Categories | ATSRecruiting | ATSRecruiting |
Understanding the Differences
Both Greenhouse and Workable solve similar problems, but they approach them differently.Greenhouse positions itself as "hiring software for growing companies" while Workablefocuses on "recruiting software for hiring teams". These differences matter depending on what you're trying to accomplish.
When to Choose Greenhouse
Greenhouse makes sense if you're looking for a comprehensive paid solution. With a score of 87/100, it's our top pick in this comparison.
When to Choose Workable
Workable is worth considering if you need a professional-grade tool.
Who Should Use What?
Bootstrapped or small team?
Neither is free, but both have their value. Test them both and see which clicks.
We'd pick: Workable
Growing fast?
Your team doubled last quarter and you need tools that won't break when you add 50 more people. Greenhouse handles scale better in our testing.
We'd pick: Greenhouse
Enterprise with complex needs?
You need SSO, compliance certifications, and a support team that picks up the phone. Greenhouse is built for organizations like yours.
We'd pick: Greenhouse
Still not sure? Answer these 3 questions
How much can you spend?
Both are paid tools. If money isn't the issue, go with Greenhouse—it scored higher.
Do you care what other users think?
Both have similar review counts. Read a few before you commit.
Expert opinion or crowd wisdom?
Our team rated Greenhouse higher (87/100). But the community has upvoted Workable more (0 votes). Pick your source of truth.
Key Takeaways
What Greenhouse Does Better
- Higher overall score (87/100)
- Our recommendation for most use cases
Consider Workable If
- Its specific features better match your workflow
- You prefer its interface or design approach
The Bottom Line
If we had to pick one, we'd go with Greenhouse (87/100). But the honest answer is that "better" depends on your situation. Greenhouse scores higher in our analysis, but Workable might be the right choice if its specific strengths align with what you need most. Take advantage of free trials to test both before committing.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Greenhouse or Workable better?
Based on our analysis, Greenhouse scores higher with 87/100. Greenhouse ispaid while Workable is paid. The best choice depends on your specific needs and budget. We recommend testing both with free trials if available.
Can I switch from Greenhouse to Workable easily?
Migration difficulty varies. Check if both tools support data export/import in compatible formats. Some tools offer migration assistance or have integration partners who can help with the transition.
Do Greenhouse and Workable offer free trials?
Most software in this category offers free trials or free tiers. Greenhouse is paid with potential trial.Workable is paid with potential trial. Visit their websites for current trial offers.