Kissflow vs Make: Which is Better in 2026?
Choosing between Kissflow and Make comes down to understanding what each tool does best. This comparison breaks down the key differences so you can make an informed decision based on your specific needs, not marketing claims.
Bottom line: Make wins this matchup. HubSpot is our overall Workflow Automation pick. HubSpot is our free Workflow Automation pick. Pick Kissflow if you need no-code.
Short on time? Here's the quick answer
Based on published vendor pricing and features and on public review data, here's who should pick what:
Kissflow
Low-code workflow and process automation
Best for you if:
- • You want low-code workflow
Make
Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder
Best for you if:
- • You want a free tier before you commit
| At a Glance | Kissflow | Make |
|---|---|---|
Starts at | $10/user/month Basic | Free Free plan |
Category | No-Code Workflow Automation | Workflow Automation No-Code |
Rating | 4.3/5 G2 4.3 · Capterra 4.2 · SourceForge 5.0 680 reviews | 4.0/5 PeerSpot 4.0 18 reviews |
Free plan | No | Yes |
Watch out for | Mandatory 50-user minimum for all paid plans | Every module counts as 1 credit -- triggers, filters, routers, and actions all consume credits (only error handlers and Router modules are free) |
Choose Kissflow or Make?
Choose Kissflow if
- You want low-code workflow
- You want good for processes
- Budget matters ($10/user/month vs Free)
- You work in no-code, not workflow automation
Choose Make if
- You want a free tier before you commit
- You want visual builder
- You want more powerful than Zapier
- You work in workflow automation, not no-code
In-Depth Analysis
Kissflow
Low-code workflow and process automation
Kissflow's pricing, starting at $10 per user/month for the Basic plan with a 50-user minimum, is on the higher side for small teams, making it quite expensive for those just starting out.
Watch out
Mandatory 50-user minimum for all paid plans
Strengths
- Pro: Low-code workflow
- Pro: Good for processes
- Pro: User friendly
- Pro: Good templates
- Pro: Fair pricing
Weaknesses
- Con: Limited customization
- Con: Learning curve
- Con: Enterprise features paid
- Con: Integration limits
- Con: Better for simple workflows
Key features
Make
Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder
Make is the best value in workflow automation for most teams.
Watch out
Every module counts as 1 credit -- triggers, filters, routers, and actions all consume credits (only error handlers and Router modules are free)
Strengths
- Pro: Visual builder
- Pro: More powerful than Zapier
- Pro: Better value
Weaknesses
- Con: Steeper learning curve
- Con: Complex for simple tasks
Key features
Pricing: Kissflow vs Make
| Plan | Kissflow | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 | $10 /user/month Basic | Free Free |
| Tier 2 | $20 /user/month Enterprise | $10.59 Core |
| Tier 3 | custom Custom | $18.82 Pro |
| Tier 4 | N/A | $29 Teams |
Pricing verified from each vendor's public pricing page. Compare in detail on Kissflow pricing and Make pricing.
Key Takeaways
Make
- Free tier available
- Our pick for this comparison
Kissflow
- Larger review base (680 reviews)
- Better fit for no-code
The Bottom Line
Make wins this matchup. HubSpot is our overall Workflow Automation pick. HubSpot is our free Workflow Automation pick.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kissflow or Make better in 2026?
Make wins this matchup. HubSpot is our overall Workflow Automation pick. HubSpot is our free Workflow Automation pick. Pick Kissflow for no-code workflows (main strength: low-code workflow). Pick Make for workflow automation workflows (main strength: visual builder).
What are Kissflow and Make used for?
Kissflow: Low-code workflow and process automation. Make: Build complex automations with a drag-and-drop visual builder.
What does Kissflow cost vs Make?
Kissflow's paid plans start at $10/user/month (Basic). Make's paid plans start at Free (Core).
What's the main difference between Kissflow and Make?
Kissflow's main strength: low-code workflow. Make's main strength: visual builder.