
Star History
Claim this toolVisualize and compare the star history of GitHub repositories.
Visit WebsiteFreeVisit Website
Tracked since2026
0 reviews trackedThe Bottom Line
Entry price
Free, no paid tier
Biggest pro
Easy to use interface for quick analysis
Biggest con
Relies solely on GitHub stars as a metric (doesn't include forks, issues, etc.)
TL;DR - Star History
- Visualizes GitHub star history for repositories.
- Compares star growth of multiple projects.
- Helps analyze project popularity and trends.
Pricing: Free forever
Best for: Individuals & startups
What is Star History?
This tool allows users to track and compare the star growth of multiple GitHub repositories over time. By simply entering the repository names, users can generate a visual graph that illustrates the star count evolution, providing insights into a project's popularity and growth trajectory. It's ideal for developers, project managers, and open-source enthusiasts who want to monitor the success of their own projects or analyze the trends of competing or complementary open-source software.
The platform helps in understanding which projects are gaining traction, identifying growth patterns, and making informed decisions about technology adoption or contribution. It offers a straightforward way to visualize data that is otherwise scattered or requires manual tracking, making it easier to spot trends and compare performance at a glance.
Available on: Web, Chrome
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Easy to use interface for quick analysis
- Provides a clear visual representation of project growth
- Useful for competitive analysis in the open-source space
- Free to use without registration
Cons
- Relies solely on GitHub stars as a metric (doesn't include forks, issues, etc.)
- Limited functionality beyond star history visualization
- No data export options mentioned
Key Features
Visualize star history of a single GitHub repositoryCompare star history of multiple GitHub repositoriesInteractive graph display of star count over timeAbility to add multiple repositories for comparisonClear all selected repositories
Pricing
Free
Star History is completely free to use with no hidden costs.
Reviews

$99Free with your review
Write a reviewReview Star History, get a free AI guide
Share your experience and we will send you Improve Your Thinking Patterns Using ChatGPT, free.
Best Star History Alternatives
Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.
Still deciding?
Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.
Explore More
Star History FAQ
How does Star History help in analyzing open-source projects?
Star History allows users to visualize and compare the star growth of GitHub repositories over time. This provides insights into a project's popularity and growth trajectory, helping users understand which projects are gaining traction.
Which teams would benefit most from using Star History?
Developers, project managers, and open-source enthusiasts can all benefit from Star History. It helps them monitor the success of their own projects or analyze trends of competing or complementary open-source software.
What kind of data does Star History use for its visualizations?
Star History relies solely on GitHub stars as its metric for visualization. It tracks and compares the star growth of multiple GitHub repositories over time to generate visual graphs.
How is Star History priced?
Star History is free to use, and no registration is required to access its features. There are no paid plans or subscription fees associated with the tool.
Can Star History compare projects with tools like Mindsite?
Star History focuses specifically on visualizing and comparing the star history of GitHub repositories, offering a clear visual representation of project growth. While Mindsite may offer broader analytics, Star History provides a specialized view of open-source project popularity based on star counts.
What are the primary limitations of Star History?
The primary limitation of Star History is its reliance solely on GitHub stars as a metric, meaning it doesn't include other factors like forks or issues. Additionally, its functionality is limited to star history visualization, and it does not offer data export options.
Source: star-history.com