PullApprove
UnclaimedStreamline human code review and enforce approval policies with configuration as code.
Visit WebsiteThe Bottom Line
Entry price
Free plan available, paid tiers above
Biggest pro
Offers more granular control over code review policies than native GitHub CODEOWNERS.
Biggest con
Requires a credit card for private repo trials.
TL;DR - PullApprove
- Enforces human code review policies using configuration as code (`CODEREVIEW.toml`).
- Provides advanced ownership and approval rules beyond GitHub CODEOWNERS.
- Scalable solution for managing code approvals in small teams to large enterprises.
What is PullApprove?
Available on: Web
Pros & Cons
Pros
- Offers more granular control over code review policies than native GitHub CODEOWNERS.
- Configuration as code ensures review policies are version-controlled and auditable.
- Highly scalable, proven in production for over a decade with large organizations.
- Provides flexibility for complex team structures and monorepos with features like overlapping scopes and alternate reviewers.
- Dedicated support and onboarding for larger plans.
Cons
- Requires a credit card for private repo trials.
- Open-source free plan has specific eligibility criteria, excluding projects backed by large companies with paid contributors.
Ratings Across the Web
Ratings aggregated from independent review platforms. Learn more
Key Features
Pricing Plans
Free TrialPricing checked May 29, 2026
Public Repos
Free
Private Repos Trial
Free
Reviews
Be the first to review PullApprove
Your take helps the next buyer. Verified LinkedIn reviewers get a badge.
Write a reviewBest PullApprove Alternatives
Top alternatives based on features, pricing, and user needs.
Search, understand, and manage code across all your repositories
Automated code review for bugs, vulnerabilities, and code smells
Automated code review that catches bugs and security issues
A syntax-highlighting pager for git, diff, and grep output.
Automated code formatting that eliminates style debates
Pluggable JavaScript and TypeScript linter
Still deciding?
Most buyers shortlist 2 or 3 tools before committing. Pull a side-by-side comparison or browse the full alternatives shortlist below.
Explore More
PullApprove FAQ
How does PullApprove's `CODEREVIEW.toml` enhance or differ from GitHub's native CODEOWNERS functionality?
CODEREVIEW.toml extends beyond GitHub's CODEOWNERS by combining code ownership with explicit approval requirements. It allows for features like per-scope approval thresholds, reviewed-for confirmation, request limits, and the ability to define overlapping scopes, which are not available in the standard CODEOWNERS file. This provides a more robust and flexible policy enforcement mechanism.Can PullApprove manage review policies for a monorepo with diverse teams and varying approval needs?
What is the 'author_value' parameter in the `CODEREVIEW.toml` configuration used for?
author_value parameter allows you to assign a 'value' to the pull request author's review. For example, setting author_value = 1 means the author's review counts as one approval towards the require threshold, potentially reducing the number of additional reviewers needed for sign-off on their own changes.Does PullApprove integrate with self-hosted GitHub Enterprise Server instances, or is it limited to GitHub.com?
How does PullApprove handle situations where primary reviewers are unavailable, and what are 'alternates'?
CODEREVIEW.toml, you can define alternates for specific scopes. If the primary reviewers are unable to approve, an alternate reviewer can step in to provide the necessary sign-off, ensuring that the review process doesn't get blocked.Source: pullapprove.com